Partial Arrest?
Ah, catch and release strikes again? If this turns out to be true, there's going to be big trouble.
"He did not say that they had been arrested,"
He might not have said it, but had it actually happened? You know if someone sculpts a denial there is something behind it.
The article says that the gov't says they were not arrested. Why does the title of the article say that they were previously arrested?
Sounds like the UK has similar reporter problems as we do here.
Ah, the good old Aruban method of police detection. Let the suspects loose so that they can be observed. Sometimes it works; sometimes it doesn't.
UK PD procedure sounds like the "Aruban" police dept.
we will never get the entire truth about this incident. any truths that might lead to a re-examination of what should be proper practices to fight the war on terror, if not for the left's influence of dumbing everyone down, will be covered up.
Arrest and release to monitor them?
Well, that really worked well.
How about deporting the bad guys sometime?
Why do free societies not have the right to keep out those who want to destroy the infrastructure?
Hey politicians, you guys have bodyguards. The rest of us don't. Why don't you stop your nonsense and do your jobs.
I keep waiting to hear the bombers had recently been released from Gitmo...
So much for he effectiveness of THAT stragtegy.
Not sure whether this story has been amended since the original post but the headline is now 'SUSPECTS 'NOT ARRESTED'.
""It seems that part of this team had been subject to partial arrest ... in Spring 2004," Mr Sarkozy said."
I've never heard of the concept of partial arrest in British law.