Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cooper Details Rove Conversations About Plame
Fox News ^ | 7/13/05

Posted on 07/13/2005 12:00:18 PM PDT by areafiftyone

WASHINGTON — Journalist Matt Cooper (search) on Wednesday told reporters he would give them details of his grand jury testimony detailing a conversations with White House aide Karl Rove (search) about a CIA operative — in a future issue of Time magazine.

"I'm not going to scoop myself today," Cooper, a White House correspondent for the news weekly, said outside the U.S. District Court Wednesday afternoon.

Cooper spoke after a two-and-a-half hour appearance before the grand jury investigating the leak of CIA officer Valerie Plame's (search) identity. He was one of several journalists to whom Plame's identity was leaked following the publication of an editorial written by her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson (search), in which Wilson criticized the Bush administration.

One of those journalists, Judith Miller (search) of The New York Times, is in jail for her refusal to name the person who revealed Plame's identity to her. Last week, Cooper escaped a similar citation for contempt of court when he told the judge his source had waived confidentiality, freeing him to testify before the grand jury.

"Today I testified and agreed to testify solely because of a waiver I received from my source," Cooper said outside the courthouse. "Once a journalist makes a commitment of confidentiality to a source, only the source can end that commitment."

The grand jury is tasked with finding out if whoever leaked her identity to the press two years ago did so with the intent of burning her cover, possibly in retaliation for Wilson's criticisms of the administration's claims that Iraq's nuclear program.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2005 12:00:19 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

This still stinks abominably. I sure hope the prosecutor is turning over some rocks because horrifying creatures are gonna be crawling out.


2 posted on 07/13/2005 12:03:02 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?
3 posted on 07/13/2005 12:03:11 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Im sure the hit piece has already been written...he knows full well Rove won't respond because Rove is honoring the SP request to stay quiet.


4 posted on 07/13/2005 12:03:17 PM PDT by mystery-ak (The real Supreme Court meets up here...God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

All this BS to sell magazines, who'da thunk.


5 posted on 07/13/2005 12:04:33 PM PDT by RckyRaCoCo ("When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

Exactly - Rove is doing the right thing by keeping quiet and this big fat mouth Cooper is yapping! He's an opportunist!


6 posted on 07/13/2005 12:04:48 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

Could Cooper be in trouble for writing about this matter before the investigation is complete? And when does anyone know this is going to happen? Time will tell I guess


7 posted on 07/13/2005 12:05:22 PM PDT by newconhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"I'm not going to scoop myself today," Cooper

Not to worry, anything newsworthy will leak well before he can write his TIME article. Not to mention, people will first learn of any leak on the new media....talk radio and the internet.

8 posted on 07/13/2005 12:05:48 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The husband of one of Hillary's closest advisors can be trusted to be fair and balaned, right? /sarcasm


9 posted on 07/13/2005 12:06:08 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
"I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?"

That's what I thought, too. The Clintonistas kept leaking grand jury info and then blaming it on Kenneth Starr, and the media was all in an uproar about Starr. I don't know how this is different.
10 posted on 07/13/2005 12:08:57 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"I'm not going to scoop myself today," Cooper, a White House correspondent for the news weekly, said outside the U.S. District Court Wednesday afternoon.


What Cooper is doing is not unethical to him....for he has no ethics. May his mercenary shameless selfpromition cause him great boils across his buttocks!!
11 posted on 07/13/2005 12:10:12 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 ( Heaven on Earth is where the nearest Starbucks is 60 miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

ROFLMAO - boils and sores! YIKES!


12 posted on 07/13/2005 12:11:17 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
LOL!

It turns out he had already been released by Rove way back when and only after it looked like he might go to jail HIS ATTORNEY contacted ROVE's ATTORNEY to see if they still meant it! What a big coward!

13 posted on 07/13/2005 12:11:34 PM PDT by The G Man (The Red States ... the world's only hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette; PatrickHenry
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?

There's no restriction on a GJ witness's ability to talk about his own testimony. The restriction is on revealing GJ testimony of anyone other than yourself, AFAIK.

14 posted on 07/13/2005 12:11:38 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

LOL!


15 posted on 07/13/2005 12:12:13 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?

Everything about a grand jury is cloaked in secrecy, and most jurisdictions make it a crime to violate that secrecy. In the federal system, for example, Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that "matters occurring before the grand jury" be kept secret. The rule also says that if anyone bound by secrecy reveals "matters occurring before" a grand jury, this is "CRIMINAL contempt." The rule of secrecy binds everyone with access to grand jury proceedings (prosecutors, grand jurors, court reporters, and clerical personnel who help a prosecutor prepare for grand jury appearances), except the witnesses who testify before a grand jury.

http://www.udayton.edu/~grandjur/faq/faq7.htm

See also http://www.ishipress.com/rule6e.htm <- Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
16 posted on 07/13/2005 12:13:06 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

17 posted on 07/13/2005 12:13:34 PM PDT by freedrudge (fan of drudge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks for the GJ info.


18 posted on 07/13/2005 12:15:17 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Don't you remember all the Clintonites who gave testimony coming out and immediately revealing their testimony? I do. Some of them even LIED about what happened, we later found out. They are allowed to talk about their own testimony, nothing else. In the case of Rove, he has said the prosecutor asked him not to discuss his testimony.


19 posted on 07/13/2005 12:19:53 PM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Could it be that Dem operative Mandy Grunwald learned from Joe Wilson that his wife, Valerie Plame, had sent him to Niger? Could Grunwald then have conveyed the info to Judith Miller, who relayed it to Grunwald's husband, Matt Cooper, in an attempt to obfuscate the connection? (Miller isn't in jail because the Times wanted to protect Rove.) Could other Dem operatives with whom, and for whom, Wilson worked also be involved? Does the name Kerry mean anything to anyone? Just a few speculative questions to ponder.


20 posted on 07/13/2005 12:22:41 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson