Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Errant Former Ambassador (How Joe Wilson LIED, from 7/04)
Townhall.com ^ | July 15, 2004 | Robert Novak

Posted on 07/14/2005 1:18:10 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier

WASHINGTON -- Like Sherlock Holmes's dog that did not bark, the most remarkable aspect of last week's Senate Intelligence Committee report is what its Democratic members did not say. They did not dissent from the committee's findings that Iraq apparently asked about buying yellowcake uranium from Niger. They neither agreed to a conclusion that former diplomat Joseph Wilson was suggested for a mission to Niger by his CIA employee wife nor defended his statements to the contrary.

Wilson's activities constituted the only aspects of the yearlong investigation for which the committee's Republican chairman, Sen. Pat Roberts, was unable to win unanimous agreement. Peculiarly, the Democrats accepted the evidence building up to the Wilson conclusions but not the conclusions themselves. According to committee sources, Roberts felt Wilson had been such a "cause celebre" for Democrats that they could not face the facts about him.

For a year, Democrats have been belaboring President Bush about 16 words in his 2003 State of the Union address in which he reported Saddam Hussein's attempt to buy uranium from Africa, based on official British information. Wilson has been lionized in liberal circles for allegedly contradicting this information on a CIA mission and then being punished as a truth-teller. Now, for Intelligence Committee Democrats, it is as though the Niger question and Joe Wilson have vanished from the earth.

Because a U.S. Justice Department special prosecutor is investigating whether any crime was committed when my column first identified Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA employee, on advice of counsel I have not written on the subject since last October. However, I feel constrained to describe how the Intelligence Committee report treats the Niger-Wilson affair because it has received scant coverage except in The Washington Post, Knight-Ridder newspapers, briefly and belatedly in The New York Times and few other media outlets.

The unanimously approved report said, "interviews and documents provided to the Committee indicate that his wife, a CPD (CIA counterproliferation division) employee, suggested his name for the trip." That's what I reported, and what Wilson flatly denied and still does.

Plame sent out an internal CIA memo saying that "my husband has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity." A State Department analyst told the committee about an inter-agency meeting in 2002 that was "apparently convened by [Wilson's] wife who had the idea to dispatch [him] to use his contacts to sort out the Iraq-Niger uranium issue."

The unanimous Intelligence Committee found that the CIA report, based on Wilson's mission, differed considerably from the former ambassador's description to the committee of his findings. That report "did not refute the possibility that Iraq had approached Niger to purchase uranium." As far as his statement to The Washington Post about "forged documents" involved in the alleged Iraqi attempt to buy uranium, Wilson told the committee he may have "misspoken." In fact, the intelligence community agreed that "Iraq was attempting to procure uranium from Africa."

"While there was no dispute with the underlying facts," Chairman Roberts wrote separately, "my Democrat colleagues refused to allow" two conclusions in the report. The first conclusion merely said that Wilson was sent to Niger at his wife's suggestion. The second conclusion is devastating:

"Rather than speaking publicly about his actual experiences during his inquiry of the Niger issue, the former ambassador seems to have included information he learned from press accounts and from his beliefs about how the Intelligence Community would have or should have handled the information he provided."

The normally mild Pat Roberts is harsh in his condemnation: "Time and again, Joe Wilson told anyone who would listen that the President had lied to the American people, that the Vice President had lied, and that he had 'debunked' the claim that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa . . . [N]ot only did he NOT 'debunk' the claim, he actually gave some intelligence analysts even more reason to believe that it may be true." Roberts called it "important" for the Intelligence Committee to declare much of what Wilson said "had no basis in fact." In response, Democrats were silent.

©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; cooper; miller; novak; plame; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: The Old Hoosier

This is exactly a year old! Happy anniversary Wilson!


21 posted on 07/14/2005 2:55:09 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

"the other missing part is that the forged documents were planted there to discredit what was otherwise a true story"

When I first read this, I thought, "yeah...thats right but how could we be so stupid as to fall for something so silly?"

Then I got to thinking...hey wait a minute...forged documents...planted...true story...sounds like 60 minutes!

Then my next thought was truly gleeful: Maybe Karl Rove DID plant those forged documents with whats his name out in Abilene, in order to discredit a true story! BWAAAA haAAAA HAAAA !!!

No wonder the Dems hate us! They still fall for this sort of crap! What a bunch of idiots!


22 posted on 07/14/2005 3:01:12 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: shamusotoole
The information is more serious when you consider that the uranium mines in Niger are in fact under control of a French consortium according to the Senate report (page 36).
23 posted on 07/14/2005 3:02:55 PM PDT by krazyrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shamusotoole
Thanks for the link. I wasn't sure if I had it.

he had obtained the documents from an employee at the Niger embassy in Rome, before passing these to French intelligence, on whose payroll he had been since at least 2000.

However, he reportedly also added that he had believed that the documents in question were genuine

The alternative explanation is that they weren't forgeries, and that they were early exposure of French and Nigerienne uranium contraband operation that we now know did exist.

But if they were bogus, then you can't get around the apparent fact that the French commissioned them, and the Niger embassy created them. Then it was a French member of the IAEA that publicly exposed them as fakes once they were in US hands.

And yet the underlying story turns out to be very true.

24 posted on 07/14/2005 3:28:51 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57
Why aren't Republicans holding press conferences to get that information out there?

Why are they not mentioning who Matt Cooper's wife is? Why is the media not mentioning the Clinton connection?

25 posted on 07/14/2005 3:35:33 PM PDT by barker (If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else's dog around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: barker

Who is Cooper's wife.


26 posted on 07/14/2005 4:20:38 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Cooper's wife in Mandy Grunwald, bigtime Democrat political consultant.


27 posted on 07/14/2005 6:10:36 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (If the WMD intelligence was so bad, why does Valerie Plame still have a job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: driftless

Maybe the White House is now leading the Big Media and the Democrat Party in a wild goose chase full of you know what.
It will be interesting to see who lands on their feet.
Rove didn't break any laws.


28 posted on 07/14/2005 6:15:06 PM PDT by Revererdrv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

And why is this lying POS not standing trial for his attempt to sabotage his president during a time of war by lying to Congress? Perp walks aren't limited to Wall St. CEOs, I trust.


29 posted on 07/14/2005 6:17:45 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
"But if they were bogus, then you can't get around the apparent fact that the French commissioned them, and the Niger embassy created them. Then it was a French member of the IAEA that publicly exposed them as fakes once they were in US hands."

If memory serves, it was Blix and Kofi in tandem who immediately knew it was an obsolete Nigerian Seal. Blix is a Swede and Kofi ain't French. Was there some one else?

30 posted on 07/14/2005 6:21:44 PM PDT by shamusotoole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: shamusotoole
Was there some one else?

Yes, but I'll have to dig. El Baradei exposed them, but it was a member of his team that was credited with the exposure. I'll try to find the source but it will take me a while.

31 posted on 07/15/2005 8:42:33 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Time for another refresher.


32 posted on 10/26/2005 4:56:08 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson