Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaida's U.S. nuclear targets
WorldNetDaily ^ | July 18, 2005 | JOSEPH FARAH

Posted on 07/18/2005 7:46:43 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Al-Qaida's prime targets for launching nuclear terrorist attacks are the nine U.S. cities with the highest Jewish populations, according to captured leaders and documents.

As first revealed last week in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by the founder of WND, Osama bin Laden is planning what he calls an "American Hiroshima," the ultimate terrorist attack on U.S. cities, using nuclear weapons already smuggled into the country across the Mexican border along with thousands of sleeper agents.

The series of attacks is designed to kill 4 million, destroy the economy and fundamentally alter the course of history.

At least two fully assembled and operational nuclear weapons are believed to be hidden in the United States already, according to G2 Bulletin intelligence sources and an upcoming book, "The al-Qaida Connection: International Terrorism, Organized Crime and the Coming Apocalypse," by former FBI consultant Paul L. Williams.

The cities chosen as optimal targets are New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Boston and Washington, D.C. New York and Washington top the preferred target list for al-Qaida leadership.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Nevada; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedanukes; alqaedatargets; alqaida; americanhiroshima; attack; binladen; boston; chicago; dc; farah; jewishpopulation; jihadinamerica; lasvegas; losangeles; miami; notthisagain; nuclear; nyc; philadelphia; sanfrancisco; suitcasenukes; targets; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-146 next last
"...using nuclear weapons already smuggled into the country across the Mexican border..."

Doesn't sound feasible.

1 posted on 07/18/2005 7:46:43 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

They are all solidly Democrat cities in predominently Democrat states except for Las Vegas, Nevada.


2 posted on 07/18/2005 7:50:07 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

Of course it isn't feasible. W is doing EVERYTHING in his power to make sure our borders are safe and secure!!!!!!

/s


3 posted on 07/18/2005 7:51:29 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Support George Allen in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

So what is the MSM saying about all this? Nothing. Just what Rove said to who and when. Fiddling while Rome burns.


4 posted on 07/18/2005 7:54:00 PM PDT by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
Al Qaida could just set off a very small nuke in Memphis, Tennessee, and the predominant population there would riot and destroy everything within a hundred miles. The same goes for LA, Detroit and Washington D.C.

I was in the guard during the firemans'strike the summer of 1978 and saw what the population there in Memphis can do when they see an opportunity.

5 posted on 07/18/2005 7:54:23 PM PDT by vetvetdoug (Shiloh, Corinth, Iuka, Brices Crossroads, Harrisburg, Britton Lane, Holly Springs, Hatchie Bridge,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
At least two fully assembled and operational nuclear weapons are believed to be hidden in the United States already, according to G2 Bulletin intelligence sources and an upcoming book, "The al-Qaida Connection: International Terrorism, Organized Crime and the Coming Apocalypse," by former FBI consultant Paul L. Williams.

The cities chosen as optimal targets are New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Boston and Washington, D.C. New York and Washington top the preferred target list for al-Qaida leadership.


Lets see, that's nine targets for two bombs. And a single bomb in any one of those targers will lead to much of the Middle East becoming a nice glass parking lot, with long-lasting glow-in-the-dark decor.

Some folks just won't learn. Its not Clinton in the White House any more!

6 posted on 07/18/2005 7:55:06 PM PDT by Coyoteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

How big are these weapons? They're not H-bombs.

We could survive, I just wonder how many miles out one needs to be..


7 posted on 07/18/2005 7:55:28 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

Scuse my skepticism, but is anyone other than Farah saying this?


8 posted on 07/18/2005 7:55:32 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living affront to Islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joonbug

Congress is fiddling too....think about it...how important was steriods in baseball?

60 senators just voted against increasing # of border agents.


9 posted on 07/18/2005 7:55:36 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Support George Allen in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
Doesn't sound feasible.

Its not - This is a pure BS story (the guy has a new book coming out...or is already out).

al Qeade does not have any nuclear weapons, nor the means for maintaining them. Old Soviet Nukes (of the small "suitcase" kind) would be useless by now. They have a rather short shelf life if not continually maintained.

10 posted on 07/18/2005 7:55:44 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
Jeez, not this sh*t again. How many times does Farah's dribble have to be posted here?

Farah has been hoping and praying for a nuclear attack on the United States for a long time. First it was Iran and their magical EMP weapon and now Al Qaeda and their dozens of nuclear warheads. Farah is off his rocker and doesn't have a clue about what he is spewing.

11 posted on 07/18/2005 8:00:26 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Tom Tancredo- The Republican Party's Very Own Cynthia McKinney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

This is just WND using sensationalism to get the borders closed. In a previous article on the same topic, they used the "al Qaeda smuggled nukes into the US via Mexico" line to argue for closing the border. Well, if the nukes were already smuggled, what good will closing the border do, WND? Could you be any more transparent?

We need to get our border under control, but this isn't the way to do it.


12 posted on 07/18/2005 8:00:39 PM PDT by Terpfen (Liberals call the Constitution a living document because they enjoy torturing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

fear-mongering at its finest.


13 posted on 07/18/2005 8:02:32 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

The anarchist-socialists count on just such chaos. Their own "peace protests" have been known to end in violence and destruction.


14 posted on 07/18/2005 8:02:44 PM PDT by weegee (Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

Michael Savage was reporting on this last week and I think before him it was they guy who took over for Art Bell on Coast To Coast.

And I am being series.


15 posted on 07/18/2005 8:04:05 PM PDT by weegee (Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

This is pure speculation. Unfortunately, it's possible, because there are rogue nations who might be willing to sell atomic weapons and the Arabs have billions in cash. Although Bush scared Libya into dropping its atomic program (for which the leftist media have given Bush zero credit, barely mentioning this huge story), there are weapons to be had from China, Pakistan, and North Korea. And Pakistani nuclear scientists are still out there somewhere.

The Russian suitcase weapons have been a perennial rumor, but nothing seems to have come of it. If they have had them for years, as the story goes, I should think they would have used them before now.

It would be nice if the FBI and the CIA could get their acts together and start putting a few more agents in place. Their human intelligence vis-a-vis the Muslims is not very good.


16 posted on 07/18/2005 8:04:29 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

I'm all ears. Let's hear your master plan.


17 posted on 07/18/2005 8:04:49 PM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
I posted this article this morning at 3:39am PDT

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1445174/posts
18 posted on 07/18/2005 8:05:18 PM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Yes Paul Williams sure made the rounds.....


19 posted on 07/18/2005 8:05:37 PM PDT by cmsgop ( Bong Hits, Fraggle Rock Reruns and DU is no way to go through Life....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
Initially not really all that far away. It is where the wind is blowing that is the question.

I think that the fallout is what would get the claim the most victims.
20 posted on 07/18/2005 8:08:18 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/osamanuk.html
Osama bin Laden and nuclear weapons

by Wm. Robert Johnston
last updated 22 September 2002

Al Qaeda's interest in nuclear weapons has been a recent topic of discussion and a highly relevant one. There is little hard data addressing the question of how close bin Laden's organization is to a nuclear weapons capability. What little data there is has sometimes been misrepresented in media reports. Thus, this review may be useful.

Contents

* How terrorists could obtain a nuclear weapon
* Evidence regarding Al Qaeda's nuclear program
* Radiological weapons
* Observations regarding Al Qaeda and nuclear weapons




http://www.nautilus.org/archives/fora/Special-Policy-Forum/47_Albright.html
 
Al Qaeda's Nuclear Program: Through the Window of Seized Documents


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1657901.stm

Al-Qaeda nuclear plans confirmed

The United States has confirmed that documents found in a Kabul building believed to have been used as a safe house by Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda network contained details about how to produce nuclear weapons.

US Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge said the information could have been found on the internet and it did not mean Bin Laden was able to build a nuclear device.

We have to be prepared for all eventualities, including a nuclear threat

Tom Ridge, US Homeland Security Director"Much of that information could have been taken right off the internet some years ago. So there is nothing unusual about that information," said Mr Ridge.

It comes after Britain's Times newspaper said one of its reporters found the papers, which were partly burned, as the city was taken over by Northern Alliance fighters.

Mr Ridge said their discovery was consistent with statements made by Bin Laden - the main suspect in the 11 September suicide hijackings - that he wanted to acquire a nuclear capability.

The documents explained how to detonate explosives to compress plutonium and trigger a thermonuclear reaction.

They were in Arabic, German, Urdu and English.


21 posted on 07/18/2005 8:10:59 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

This is what I send G2 bulletins with. The message is generally "I'm playing through".

22 posted on 07/18/2005 8:11:20 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

bueller? bueller?


23 posted on 07/18/2005 8:14:22 PM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mulch

My plan for what? Border security? Beef up the Border Patrol, fence off popular cross areas, UAVs and helicopters in the rougher spots. Horses, dirt bikes, and 4x4s for agents, and gadgets that will let each agent download the video feed of a certain UAV for when illegals are spotted.

You seem to think my disdain for WND's cheap readership ploy means I'm one of those open border nutjobs.


24 posted on 07/18/2005 8:25:36 PM PDT by Terpfen (Liberals call the Constitution a living document because they enjoy torturing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mulch

Say what?


25 posted on 07/18/2005 8:25:56 PM PDT by Terpfen (Liberals call the Constitution a living document because they enjoy torturing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

Los Angeles: Streisand, Spielberg...just those 2 would constitute a large Jewish population. But, talk about biting the hands that feed you.


26 posted on 07/18/2005 8:36:48 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
A - 2-3 miles.
H - 10-15 miles.
27 posted on 07/18/2005 8:44:58 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

My dad says there are satellites that can detect nuclear weapons - that's how we know how many say Russia, India, Pakistan, etc. have .... doesn't anyone think that they'd aim those at the US to see where they'd be?

Regards,
j


28 posted on 07/18/2005 8:56:17 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("If Love Can't Buy You Happiness, You Don't Know Where To Shop")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

That's not exactly true.Sublaunched & weapons buried under deep earth are not easy to detect via satellites & count.The most accurate methods to determine N-numbers still used is to estimate the amount of enriched uranium or plutonium that a countries reactors produce & the time taken to make weapons using it.If you look at most websites,they give estimates(40-60,450-550).


29 posted on 07/18/2005 10:08:33 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

"Scuse my skepticism, but is anyone other than Farah saying this?"


“12th imam Operation” a Multiple Nuclear Attack
by Curt Weldon/ July 16, 2005
Not long after 9/11, Congressman Weldon found himself on the front lines of the War on Terror, enmeshed in international intrigues with spies and killers. He learned about plots to assassinate world figures (including a former U.S. President) and of a plot to kill hundreds of thousands of Americans by radiation poisoning. Ultimately, he would discover a still more audacious plot -- one that is still unfolding. It's a plan to inflict a terrorist attack on the United States -- an attack of such catastrophic dimensions that it is code-named after Shi'ite Islam's 12th imam: the prophet of doom who ushers in the Islamic apocalypse, rewarding the faithful and, with appalling violence, purging all infidels from the face of the Earth.
[Weldon explains] how the 12th Imam operation could paralyze the whole nation and end with the death of two-thirds of our people by slow starvation. http://www.falange.us/countdown.htm


30 posted on 07/18/2005 11:43:11 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
Doesn't Las Vegas send us Senator Harry Reid?
31 posted on 07/18/2005 11:47:21 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
"They have a rather short shelf life if not continually maintained."

I see people claiming this, but I have yet to see anyone provide support for the claim. Missiles, yes, the fuel system (potentially) requires maintenance. Warheads? Aside from the fissionable materials, the rest of a nuke is readily maintained especially if you don't care about the tricky timing mechanisms, targeting hardware, sensors, or anything other than the bang.

Plutonium (Pu239) has a half-life of about 24,000 years, so a cold war era warhead will have lost about .05 % of its potential bang.

And the amount of plutonium required is quite easily carried by a single person (I won't actually mention the quantity, but the information is easily obtained on the web). Plutonium is an alpha emitter, and alpha particles can be stopped by a sheet of paper. Minimal shielding would be required. Besides, if you are planning to die for the cause, what difference does it make if it is by cancer or nuclear detonation? Plutonium gets really dangerous only when inhaled or ingested.

I'd really like to see some supporting evidence that nukes have short shelf lives, because my experience leads me to conclude otherwise.
32 posted on 07/19/2005 12:48:30 AM PDT by calenel (The Democratic Party is the Socialist Mafia. It is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Don't Jews vote solidly 'Rat?


33 posted on 07/19/2005 12:59:42 AM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Washington State--Land of Court-approved Voting Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by the founder of WND

Follow the money.....
34 posted on 07/19/2005 4:37:11 AM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: calenel

I've read that suitcase style bombs go bad because the emitted radiation destroys the electronics over time.


35 posted on 07/19/2005 6:07:16 AM PDT by freebird5850 ("Tell the truth, there's less to remember!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Yes I heard about the immigration vote. Includes Hillary who voted against it. So much for her being tough on illegal immigration.


36 posted on 07/19/2005 7:13:32 AM PDT by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hmmmm, well I bet those idiots have it in their car or on the second floor of some tenament building ......


37 posted on 07/19/2005 10:05:57 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("If Love Can't Buy You Happiness, You Don't Know Where To Shop")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: calenel

These tiny nukes use tritium. The half life is a few years.


38 posted on 07/19/2005 10:07:40 AM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone; freebird5850
Tritium based nukes would need fuel replenishment, but that really isn't any more difficult than replenishing the coolant in your refrigerator or air conditioner - if you have the tritium.

Tritium isn't all that hard to get, either. It has many commercial uses and is commonly available.

As far as the electronics on the bomb go, there isn't much to it if all you care about is the bang. Easy to repair or replace.

But I don't think the terrorists are going to waste time with nuclear hand grenades. If they had 'em they would have used 'em.

The only reason for holding off from using the nukes would be for a more spectacular attack, and that makes suitcase nukes a waste of time when there is a much bigger bang for the buck available.

I still think somebody wanted it to be hard to keep nukes in working order and made a statement to that effect, wanting and wishing it to be so. And other people who also wanted it to be true bought into it and kept passing it around until it achieved the status of urban legend. And that is what I think it is - an urban legend. I'd really like it if someone could convince me otherwise, but it hasn't happened yet.
39 posted on 07/19/2005 10:40:07 AM PDT by calenel (The Democratic Party is the Socialist Mafia. It is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: calenel

It ain't quite as easy as putting oil in your car's engine. There is not a little cap labeled "add tritium here." Lithium hydride, a solid, is precision machined into the bomb material.


40 posted on 07/19/2005 10:44:13 AM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
I'm not claiming it is trivial, however, lithium hydride LiH (with the H being the tritium) isn't difficult, either. Is it super hard or some other factor that makes it impossible to handle? I would expect it to be chemically active without some form of isolation (as Li probably prefers Oxygen over Hydrogen, yielding LiOH).

In any case, I have already dismissed baby nukes as not worthwhile. They want to destroy us entirely, our economy, our culture, our society. A couple of backpack nukes will not do that. In fact, a major WMD attack on us is most likely to result in the Islamic Armageddon.
41 posted on 07/19/2005 12:15:27 PM PDT by calenel (The Democratic Party is the Socialist Mafia. It is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: calenel

I believe the suitcase nukes, actually more the size of a foot locker, are not completly radiation tight and leave a tell tale signature that can be picked up by monitors doing sweeps.


42 posted on 07/19/2005 12:20:53 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: calenel

Let me give you a few items to chew on, then.

First nuclear weapons are devices. They use precise electronics, which have to have microsecond timing in order to cause detonation. Not something that you can cobble together from that old VCR. They need to be maintained in order to insure that they work when needed. They require a power source, which means batteries. Ones not available at Radio Shack. The triggers (basically switches) which set off the explosives that cause the detonation are gassed, and lose their switching speed over time. After 5 or 6 years, their timing gets off, and they become unusable, due to outgassing. Then there is the explosives themselves. They lay against the pit (plutonium core) which is thermally hot, and causes the shaped charges to degrade over time, losing their ability to fire a predictable rate after a time.

All weapons, in order to be safe, have an MSAD built in. You would not want it to go off until you want, right? This requires an external arming device, which is mated to the device (for portable ones).

I am not saying that these devices do not exist. I am dubious as to the effectiveness of a device that has been laying around for 5 years without any PM working as designed.


43 posted on 07/19/2005 12:49:15 PM PDT by Mr. Quarterpanel (I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite; Fruit of the Spirit
"Of course it isn't feasible. W is doing EVERYTHING in his power to make sure our borders are safe and secure!!!!!!

/s"

Lol...

The Syria-Iraq border is tighter than our own!

44 posted on 07/19/2005 12:55:40 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

With these nuke articles from WackoNutDaily popping up so fast I bet we'll be seeing another "Prices Slashed" on the monthly "intelligence" newsletter.


45 posted on 07/19/2005 12:57:59 PM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Quarterpanel
"First nuclear weapons are devices. They use precise electronics, which have to have microsecond timing in order to cause detonation. Not something that you can cobble together from that old VCR. They need to be maintained in order to insure that they work when needed."

Most of the electronics in a nuke are unnecessary baggage. As for the required stuff, say, the timer to set off the shaped charge just right to convert the slightly sub-critical mass to a critical mass, that is very simple electronics.

"They require a power source, which means batteries. Ones not available at Radio Shack."

Do you know how much juice it takes to set off the explosives? Just plug it in to the wall. Why do you need batteries? And how do you know that you couldn't get a suitable battery at Radio Shack?

"The triggers (basically switches) which set off the explosives that cause the detonation are gassed, and lose their switching speed over time. After 5 or 6 years, their timing gets off, and they become unusable, due to outgassing."

Old tech. Off the shelf solid state electronics can do the job now.

"Then there is the explosives themselves. They lay against the pit (plutonium core) which is thermally hot, and causes the shaped charges to degrade over time, losing their ability to fire a predictable rate after a time."

So replace them. That's easy.

"All weapons, in order to be safe, have an MSAD built in. You would not want it to go off until you want, right? This requires an external arming device, which is mated to the device (for portable ones)."

There is no way it could go off unless you initiated the (brand new solid state) trigger. This is just more extra junk to prevent theft-and-immediate-use situations. And we aren't talking about portables. In fact, the scenario I see as most likely is a sufficient quantity of Pu239 salvaged from an old warhead is brought into the US and the rest of the nuke is built around it from parts acquired in the US. So we are talking about a slightly sub-critical mass of plutonium, some HE and some relatively inexpensive electronics. We aren't talking about taking an existing device and flipping a switch.

And, finally, plutonium will go critical all by itself in relatively small quantities. You have to be careful not to pile too much plutonium up in one spot because it will go off. For all you people out there who aren't keeping their plutonium piles properly separated, you have been warned.
46 posted on 07/19/2005 1:47:33 PM PDT by calenel (The Democratic Party is the Socialist Mafia. It is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: calenel; freebird5850
Tritium isn't all that hard to get, either. It has many commercial uses and is commonly available.

Weaponized (pure) amounts of Tritium would be extremely hard to get - In any quantity that would be needed without setting off red flags -

Tritium Production Tritium ( 3 H) is essential to the construction of boosted-fission nuclear weapons. A boosted weapon contains a mixture of deuterium and tritium, the gases being heated and compressed by the detonation of a plutonium or uranium device. The D-T mixture is heated to a temperature and pressure such that thermonuclear fusion occurs. This process releases a flood of 14 MeV neutrons which cause additional fissions in the device, greatly increasing its efficiency.

Tritium is rare in nature because of its 12.4-year half-life. It is produced by cosmic radiation in the upper atmosphere where it combines with oxygen to form water. It then falls to earth as rain, but the concentration is too low to be useful in a nuclear weapons program. Most tritium is produced by bombarding 6Li [ 6 Li(n, a) 3 H] with neutrons in a reactor; it is also produced as a byproduct of the operation of a heavy-water-moderated reactor when neutrons are captured on the deuterons present. It has been suggested that it may be feasible to produce tritium in an accelerator (electronuclear breeder) in which protons bombard an appropriate target.

Tritium can be stored and shipped as a gas, a metal hydride (e.g., of titanium) or tritide, and trapped in zeolites (hydrated aluminum silicate compounds with uniform size pores in their crystalline structure). Stainless-steel cylinders with capacities up to 5.6 ´ 10 7 GBq (1.5 MCi) of tritium gas are used for transportation and storage and must be constructed to withstand the additional pressure which will build up as tritium gradually decays to 3 He.

All five declared nuclear weapon states must have the underlying capability to manufacture and handle tritium, although the United States has shut down its production reactors due to safety considerations. Canada manufactures tritium as a byproduct of the operation of CANDU reactors. In principle, limited amounts of tritium could be made in any research reactor with the ability to accept a target to be irradiated.

47 posted on 07/19/2005 2:30:31 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
Woo Hoo! Huntsville/Decatur, Ala. didn't make the list!

We're gonna live! We're gonna live!

48 posted on 07/19/2005 2:32:04 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
I think that the fallout is what would get the claim the most victims.

That thought is the result of several decades of scaremongering by the 'Silent Spring' people right up through the polluted babies crowd of this week. Blast and fire are the main destructive components. Some are scared of the EMP. Be more afraid of rioting and panic when the local warehouse stores run out of canned goods and paper products. If your hair and skin haven't fallen off within three days of the blast, you will probably survive the nuke itself.

49 posted on 07/19/2005 2:39:29 PM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

Whew. Glad I live here near Seattle where there is apparently few Jewish folks yet plenty of those appeasement loving homosexuals keeping us safe! Whew.


50 posted on 07/19/2005 2:40:51 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (The government and courts are stealing your freedom & liberty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson