Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NARAL: Roberts Will Overturn Roe v. Wade - ("feminazis" screaming for scalps already!)
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JULY 19, 2005 | Staff Writers

Posted on 07/19/2005 8:55:06 PM PDT by CHARLITE

NARAL, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, immediately lashed out at President Bush's nominee for the Supreme Court.

"If Roberts is confirmed to a lifetime appointment, there is little doubt that he will work to overturn Roe v. Wade," a NARAL statement said Tuesday night.

"As deputy solicitor general under the first President Bush, he argued to the Supreme Court that 'Roe was wrongly decided and should be overruled,' " NARAL also claimed. Abortion will likely be the most contentious issue surrounding Judge Roberts and his nomination.

When Bush nominated Roberts to the D.C. Court of Appeals in 2003, NARAL complained:

"We believe he was nominated in large measure because of his narrow view of constitutional rights, and it is for this same reason that the Senate should reject his nomination."

The pro-abortion group was particularly irked by Roberts' argument: "The Court's conclusion in Roe that there is a fundamental right to an abortion finds no support in the text, structure, or history of the Constitution."

Republicans control the Senate's Judiciary Committee by 10-to-8, and the full Senate with 55 seats.

Unless the Democrats filibuster, Roberts is a clear favorite to win confirmation.

If the Democrats do launch a filibuster, Republicans may finally unleash "the nuclear option" and do away with the Senate rule that allows a minority to block the majority will.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; activists; antibush; johnroberts; naral; nomination; rights; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: CHARLITE

ACLU press release:



ACLU Calls for Full Examination of Roberts’ Positions; Notes Influence In Troubling Reagan, Bush I Administration Cases

July 19, 2005

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Media@dcaclu.org

WASHINGTON -- The American Civil Liberties Union today expressed deep concern about some of the civil liberties positions advocated by Judge John Roberts, President Bush's choice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court.

While serving as principal deputy solicitor general from 1989-1993, he authored briefs calling for Roe v. Wade to be overruled, supporting graduation prayer, and seeking to criminalize flag burning as a form of political protest.

"All these positions were rejected by the Supreme Court," said Steven Shapiro, the ACLU's National Legal Director. "But the Supreme Court remains closely divided on many of these questions."

As a senior Justice Department official, Roberts was in a position to help shape the government's legal positions as well as represent them.

At a minimum, the Senate should determine the extent to which the positions taken in these briefs also reflect Roberts's personal views.

Judge John Roberts was appointed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in May 2003. He received his undergraduate and law degrees from Harvard University and clerked for Justice Rehnquist. He served in a number of positions in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, including as principal deputy solicitor general from 1989 to 1993.

"The Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in advancing freedom," said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU Executive Director. "Without the Supreme Court, the South would still be segregated, illegal abortions would be claiming thousands of lives, the indigent would have no right to a lawyer, and lesbian and gay Americans could be imprisoned for their private sexual conduct."

"The stakes could not be higher," Romero added.

The ACLU will only oppose a Supreme Court nominee on a majority vote of its 83 person national board.


41 posted on 07/19/2005 10:24:17 PM PDT by purpleland (Vigilance and Valour!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scott says

Herexigency: just another frustrated, drug-addled lefty.
To take just one fact from her blather, having survived it myself, CA is definitely not a `true-blue state'. Sure, they have LA and Frisc--btw, they love it when you call it that!--they can have them. Orange county, San Diego county, the agricultural valleys, eg. Fresno, Sacramento, etc., anywhere people make their own beds--'red' as blood.
So, if you're leaving, Herexigency, we'll keep all the food, the wheat, corn, beeves--and produce--and most of the states, and on both coasts.
You can keep your 'piss-christ', other 'art' and 'culture, and bad attitudes.
Waste of a zot otherwise.


42 posted on 07/19/2005 10:27:51 PM PDT by OkieDoke (Conservatives: Controlling America Since 1994)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: herexigency

Why is it that this possibility sounds pretty good, as a whole? Weeelllll, I guess it is because the moronic wanker socialists would dick things up so bad we would have to come in and straighten stuff back out eventually. What?! No net loss of territory, you say? We would get it all back after the leftists had starved, mugged, carjacked, aborted, and backstabbed each other into the dustbin of history. So take your pathetic little ball and bat and go home.


43 posted on 07/19/2005 10:28:04 PM PDT by NC Native ("Bombing begins in five minutes"... Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OkieDoke

I am a pilgrim in an unholy land! I live in Marin County! Ground Zero for liberal stupidity. You know what... I have NO PROBLEM getting in these idiots face..I'm a contractor and CRANK talk radio all day, Beck, Rush, Savage...others, whenever anyone {not my clients, of course} complains or comments I just look at them and say "you got a problem?, I didn't think so!" I find they are just too stoned or stupid to take seriously. There are a lot more of us than that idiot thinks. Peace out!!!


44 posted on 07/19/2005 10:36:08 PM PDT by scott says
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: herexigency; Lexinom; scott says; NC Native

Hmm...says he joined on the 15th of July.

I smell a DUmmie troll.


45 posted on 07/19/2005 10:43:38 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Brave! Skilled! Total Idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: scott says

I lived in San Diego a long time ago, then El Cajon: Normal, nice people, a lot of military, retired for the most part--but with lunatic pockets. Then in La Mesa for a while: new home with four other young people. All had jobs, but kid that had the master suite kept three large Hefty bags full of homegrown in his closet--go in, take a handful, no problem . . . But now out of that fog, happily back in the midwest.
Most people like u and me grow out of that stuff, but not this ditzy chick. (Or mebbe she's just young)
Just for old times sake: 'Marin county, wow! Gnarly, cool (etc.)'
Hang in there (and see tag line)


46 posted on 07/19/2005 11:11:40 PM PDT by OkieDoke ('Non carborundum et tu los bastardes loco ignoratium' (Don't let the crazy b******* grind you down))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: herexigency

47 posted on 07/19/2005 11:14:06 PM PDT by LayoutGuru2 (Know the difference between honoring diversity and honoring perversity? No? You must be a liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

NARAL, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League......Sounds impressive....Not!


48 posted on 07/19/2005 11:17:33 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway; All
Remember, the new term is NOT feminazi, it is now, FEMILEZI. Say it with me now::: FEMILEZI!!!!( IMHO, this more accurately describes the modern feminist movement, in lock step with the gay movement, not to mention that many hard-core feminists are lesbians, hence:; FEMILEZI )!!!
49 posted on 07/19/2005 11:22:07 PM PDT by Rca2000 ( I plead the 5th amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007; herexigency
I smelled it, too but was going to wait for her response before passing judgment.

I think she might be feeling a little guilty about something, something which would twist her reality upside down in a terrible if she were to accept it. She is to be pitied if my instincts are correct.

50 posted on 07/19/2005 11:22:14 PM PDT by Lexinom (http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Roberts just called the U.S. a democracy..
A Supreme Court Judge that thinks the U.S. is democracy..
That settles it,, Hes a RINO.. and a dumb RINO at that..
Not only that, Bush's been out'ed..
51 posted on 07/19/2005 11:23:28 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

They are "extreme"ly "naral"-minded, opposing a mainstream (by historical standards) judge like Roberts.


52 posted on 07/19/2005 11:25:04 PM PDT by Lexinom (http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I caught that too, and winced a little as he said it. Cut the guy some slack though. In the big picture I have a very good feeling about this man, and will be praying for him, for wisdom and grace. Don't give up just five hours after his nomination.


53 posted on 07/19/2005 11:27:16 PM PDT by Lexinom (http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: scott says
Marin county... spent three years of my adult life there, in San Rafael and Novato. That's a place where the people passing you on the street do not make eye contact - a sign of, well, self-centeredness and possible psychedelic influence.
54 posted on 07/19/2005 11:31:29 PM PDT by Lexinom (http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

L.O.L...women with hards on to kill men perhaps??......


55 posted on 07/19/2005 11:32:15 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
[ Don't give up just five hours after his nomination. ]

Its not Roberts that I don't trust, its Dubya..
I haven't trusted him from the beginning but hoped I was wrong..

A nominated Supreme that thinks the U.S. is a democracy is a liability..
And the President that nominated him is a potential malefactor as well..

Bush has had quite a few benefits of the doubt from me already..
And I'm fresh out..

56 posted on 07/19/2005 11:48:13 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: herexigency

This is a joke,right?
Look at the COUNTY MAP of the US and you will see that the US is a virtual sea of red counties with pockets of blue, mostly in areas of poverty and urban blight.


57 posted on 07/19/2005 11:54:47 PM PDT by Cincinna (BEWARE HILLARY and her HINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

One can hope!


58 posted on 07/20/2005 12:55:29 AM PDT by FReethesheeples (Was the Narcissistic Joe Wilson a Source in "Outing" His Own Wife Valerie Plame as a "CIA Agent"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Because the left thinks he's a legislator..


59 posted on 07/20/2005 4:27:16 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Talk about the left's SICs (Single Issue Voters)! This is gonna set new records for hysteria and hyperbole! :-)


60 posted on 07/20/2005 4:44:00 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (BOHICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson