Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/21/2005 6:00:22 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Ok, Who has the crystal ball?


2 posted on 07/21/2005 6:02:45 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Coulter was wrong. Her column about Roberts had to be the worst one she's written since she spoke against legalizing drugs.


3 posted on 07/21/2005 6:02:50 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Ann is Paranoid !

Show some faith in your President.

Not everything will go your way !


4 posted on 07/21/2005 6:03:58 AM PDT by Zenith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

An anti-Roe nominee should make the case that the Supremes should merely return to the Senate the right to legislate.


5 posted on 07/21/2005 6:08:18 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Islam: Nothing couldn't cure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Ramesh must need "puffing" to compare himself with Ann.

Good thing he doesn't influence many thinkers.


7 posted on 07/21/2005 6:08:32 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

It's not about Roe... Roe is only one example of what happens when the SC "legislates from the bench". It's about upholding the Cosntitution in its original intent. If every SC candidate is put through the Roe litmus test by the donkeys AS WELL AS THE REPUBLICANS we have missed the bigger picture. For those who want Roe overturned, I suggest a strategy where it is done in phases. This is the very thing liberals fear and probably the most effective strategy in a country that DOES now freqently parrot the phrase "a women's right to choose".


8 posted on 07/21/2005 6:10:02 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

What's the point? That W should withdraw John Roberts and appoint someone more conservative? What are the chances of that? Or is the point that all the stalwart conservatives should oppose the President and join with Schumer and Kennedy in defeating Roberts?

What is Ann actually proposing besides a lot of attention for herself?


11 posted on 07/21/2005 6:12:05 AM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
And it is possible; those of us who defend him now may end up having reasons for regret.

I think that's very possible ten or fifteen years from now but not at the moment.

Many people change over time, and their values change as well. How can we be sure that today's Conservative isn't tomorrow's liberal activist?

At the moment Robert's seems to be a reliable pick for the court, but the people have no way to get rid of a judge after he's appointed and confirmed. Impeachment is a farce, and Congress has a Committee on the Judiciary that never takes a judge to task for any unconstitutional ruling.

The temptation to create unconstitutional law is too great to leave to unaccountable jurists. More checks are needed on the judiciary, and Congress must be held responsible for their lack of judicial oversight.

12 posted on 07/21/2005 6:13:19 AM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Ann is expressing her worries as we have been burned before but I don't agree with her on this one. Of course no one can be certain. Perhaps she is a little upset that her preferred choice, whomever that person is, was not chosen. I trust President Bush and I think he did his best to choose someone that, in the end, we will all be happy with.


13 posted on 07/21/2005 6:14:04 AM PDT by sydbas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

FIRST AND MOST IMPORTANT:

Rule One: You cannot post about Ann without a picture. This is regulary noted rule, the moderator should note this.

Second: Ann has a right to state her opinion, just like we do.

Third: I tend to agree with your comments but keep in mind the senate hearings are over a month away and we need to spend this time researching him and making decisions then.

Finally: Always refer to Rule One.


15 posted on 07/21/2005 6:15:23 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
IMO what better way for her to be invited on every liberal news show but to show disregard for the nominee.

At that time she can be a voice for our side in explaining lots of things including Plame etc. JMO

16 posted on 07/21/2005 6:15:48 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I think she's wrong on this one. Roberts is a good choice. Bush comes through again!


19 posted on 07/21/2005 6:17:25 AM PDT by loreldan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I don't understand Coulter's characterizing Roberts as 'stealth'. Seems he is quite the known quantity in Washington on Capitol Hill and throughout the legal community.


25 posted on 07/21/2005 6:26:59 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Maybe Ann is trying to give Judge Roberts some cover ("Look, extreme right-winger Ann Coulter is against John Roberts, so he can't be that conservative.")

Her column may be Machiavellian/Rovian/Don't-Throw-Me-In-That-Bryer-Patch-ian.

34 posted on 07/21/2005 6:45:07 AM PDT by Martin Tell (Red States [should act like they] Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I love Ann to death, but he arguments against Roberts weren't nearly convincing enough to definitively say that "Bush has screwed us!"

This is really just a wait-and-see kind of thing.


35 posted on 07/21/2005 6:46:04 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

42 posted on 07/21/2005 6:54:44 AM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

usually i'm on board with ann coulter, but not on this one.


proof is 5-10 years away.


43 posted on 07/21/2005 6:55:33 AM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

If Roberts ends up being a Rhenquist, then Ann's column will be little remebered years from now as anything more than a deviant error.

If Roberts ends up as a Kennedy or Souter, then Ann will be remembered as the genius Supreme Court Prognosticator.

In fact, even if Roberts is a Rhenquist, every rare time he departs from the desires of particular conservatives, we will hear a chorus of "Coulter was right".


47 posted on 07/21/2005 7:00:17 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I certainly hope that pro-lifers don't get taken again, but I think there's a case for hopefulness.

He thinks there's a case for hopefulness?

If that's the best he can do, he has proved Miss Coulter's point.

50 posted on 07/21/2005 7:02:27 AM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Coulter is Bush's ace in the hole.

He's told the Dems:
"Confirm Roberts or you get a recess appointment of Coulter."


52 posted on 07/21/2005 7:11:35 AM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson