Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dingell Condemns Remarks Attacking Islam by Rep. Tancredo
John Dingell Press Release ^ | 7/23/2005

Posted on 07/23/2005 6:13:24 PM PDT by 4.1O dana super trac pak

Congressman John D. Dingell (MI-15), the Dean of the House of Representatives, condemned the recent comments made by Representative Tom Tancredo (CO-06) as “ignorant” and “inexcusable” for a Member of Congress. During a recent interview on Tampa radio station WFLA-AM, Mr. Tancredo said that the US might “take out (Muslim) holy sites” in response to another terrorist attack on the US. When asked if he meant Mecca, Congressman Tancredo responded “yeah.”

Said Dingell, “First of all, suggesting the bombing of a holy site of any religion is simply inexcusable for an elected official in the United States Congress and an anathema to the millions of people of faith across our nation. To even suggest an attack on Mecca shows Congressman Tancredo has no understanding of the true nature of Islam and the peaceful Muslims living in the Arab world. The holy sites of all religions – Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism and all others – are the most sacred and hallowed places for their respective followers and to suggest that any one of these sites be bombed is clearly an attack on that religion and its followers. Mr. Tancredo’s reprehensible attack on Islam is ignorant and offensive.

“We must stand united and strong against terrorism, but these are exactly the kind of careless comments that Muslim extremists feed off of and use to recruit new terrorists. To suggest that we hold an entire religion responsible for the actions of a minority of religious extremists - in effect declare a holy war against Islam - is outrageous and plays right into the hands of those very radicals. There is no better motivation to get someone to fight an apparent enemy than to threaten what they love most and are willing to defend at any cost – whether it is their family, homeland, or their holy land. I only hope that his statement won’t be used on extremist websites as justification for a ‘holy war’ against the United States and our allies.

“America was founded by people who believed strongly both in God and in the free expression of religion; that solid foundation remains and is part of what makes us the greatest nation in the world. Mr. Tancredo’s comments --while he has the absolute right to make such remarks-- are contradictory to freedom and the values of this nation. I call on the Republican Leadership in Congress and the President to condemn these comments and make clear that this is an action that the United States would never lower itself to.”


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: Michigan; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; appeaser; dingell; islamophobes; johndingell; nukemecca; tancredo; tancreepo; votetancredo2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last
To: RoyalsFan

Michigan democrat. Never heard of him.


41 posted on 07/23/2005 6:36:04 PM PDT by 4.1O dana super trac pak (Stop the open borders death cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
But threatening to nuke Mecca is supposed to accomplish....what, exactly? I suspect there would be a fair number of radical moslem groups who wouldn't be too upset at that because, rightly or wrongly, they think it might help their causse.
As Osama bin Laden would be immediately arrested upon setting foot in Saudi Arabia, Mecca is worth far more to him as a destroyed "martyr city" than as a place of worship.

-Eric

42 posted on 07/23/2005 6:37:04 PM PDT by E Rocc (Anyone who thinks Bush-bashing is banned on FR has never read a Middle East thread >:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
Anyone saying it is is a liar or hasn't read its "sacred" texts.
How many Christians and/or Jews follow all the strictures of Leviticus? Yet the verses in question remain in the Bible.

-Eric

43 posted on 07/23/2005 6:38:50 PM PDT by E Rocc (Anyone who thinks Bush-bashing is banned on FR has never read a Middle East thread >:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: XJarhead

Well, if New York got nuked, and I was dying of radiation poisoning, at least I'd die happy knowing Mecca was a pile of glowing sand.
Kind of selfish, I grant you. If I were a better person, I suppose I'd fold paper cranes in my last hours. But I think I'll be a little too cranky for origami.


45 posted on 07/23/2005 6:41:13 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Dingell...whst is his constituency? I just can't remember.

Is he from Alabam or Mississip. No wait, he is from Michiganistan! Now why would he oppose the honesty of Tom Tancredo? It's just beyond me.

46 posted on 07/23/2005 6:41:42 PM PDT by Dark Skies ("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

Wasn't the search for a new route to the far East the reason European sailors went exploring - to avoid the murderous thieving Muslims along the overland route? And how long ago was that?


47 posted on 07/23/2005 6:41:48 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Dingell must have been educated in the United States. History, as taught, in the American schools insinuates that the United States was totally responsible for the abduction and transportation of Salves from Africa to the New World. Reality is that the Muslims were among the first slavers walking the African East to the Muslim countries. The seafaring nations, Portugal, France, Spain, Holland, England, then expanded the slave trade to the Americas.

The Slaves that arrived in the New World were transported to the Caribbean and South America to work in the sugar cane fields. 5% of all the Slaves found their way to what is now the United states. The American government outlawed Slave importation to the new nation in 1806, and the American government was abolitionist virtually from it's inception.

The Muslims actively preached and practiced Slavery as part of their Religion, and in some parts of the world the Muslims still practice Slavery.

The basic dislike of the United States by Mr. Dingell and his ilk is soiling my floor.

48 posted on 07/23/2005 6:42:21 PM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

Wfla-am and Pat Campbell is out of Orlando and not Tampa. They get the first paragraph wrong and I usually stop reading .


49 posted on 07/23/2005 6:42:30 PM PDT by Normal4me (I'm sweating like a muslim wearing a backpack on a London subway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JarheadFromFlorida
And all you are doing is carry water for Michael Moore and the jihadi wing of the DNC.

So what is your plan on this one? Mecca is bombed(not nuked, Tancredo didn't say to nuke Mecca), and then VOILA! Somehow all the terrorists in the world cease? Explain to me how that works and you may give your side some credence. I doubt it.

50 posted on 07/23/2005 6:42:57 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

Flattening Mecca wouldn't solve a damn thing and only make the situation worse. Threatening to do so is totally counterproductive and I question the intelligence of anyone who thinks this helps. If you want to break the backs of muslim fundamentalism you need to incite a cultural revolution to rip apart the degenerate muslim culture from within.


51 posted on 07/23/2005 6:43:08 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
+

"DingellBerry"

52 posted on 07/23/2005 6:43:20 PM PDT by xcamel (Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
I agree with Tancredo. Maybe moderate Muslims should stand up and stop acting like cowards if they don't want this to happen in the future. If we are hit with a nuclear weapon we should hit several targets ferociously.
53 posted on 07/23/2005 6:43:26 PM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior (PRESSURE BUSH TO CLOSE THE BORDERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc

[[Why is it that our Freepers who have been to Iraq, or are there now, don't agree with you?]]

Better yet Eric, let's see YOU walk down the street in any of these muslim countries and let's see how long it takes you to assume room temperature. Put up or shut up. The religion of peace would use your head for a paint bucket.


54 posted on 07/23/2005 6:43:33 PM PDT by JarheadFromFlorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DianeDePoitiers

Because the anti-Tancredo minions don't want to put his comments in context.


55 posted on 07/23/2005 6:43:55 PM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

LOL....Dingellberry has pals here on FR pretending to be Conservatives...


56 posted on 07/23/2005 6:45:39 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

It wasn't a threat, it was a promise.
One the muslims better pay attention to.


57 posted on 07/23/2005 6:45:56 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

Tancredo is right.

MAD requires that the islamo-fascists have something to worry about. I wouldn't be surprised if Dingell and Tancredo aren't having this argument at the behest of the NCA in deep background.

It is keeping highly publicized that which would otherwise have been a news blurb that disappeared.

We want the fascists to worry.


58 posted on 07/23/2005 6:46:37 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc

Observant Jews observe the portions that are observable at this time.


59 posted on 07/23/2005 6:46:43 PM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DianeDePoitiers
Exactly.

What is Dingell's response to what should we do if the Islamofacists use nukes?

60 posted on 07/23/2005 6:46:50 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson