It's only vanished because their simple little minds can only grasp one major scandal at a time and they all have their brains gleefully wrapped around the manufactured Rove scandal right now.
The DUmmies have slowly let it slip away. But now they have the Robert's SCOTUS nomination. They simply move from one mindless rant to the next.
A more important story concerning the impeachment of Karl Rove for something that is not a crime and for something we don't even know what was done or who did anything came up. This is hugh, call Waxman.
They can't focus on more than one thing at a time.
We all know it's not going to end, this crappola will continue until Bush ends his term in '08. And then another Repub will get elected as Prez and this bunk will start all over agian.
What can you expect from a bunch of low life losers?
Right up there with LIHOP, MIHOP, IHOP, HEHOP, SHEHOP, ITHOP, WOPBOPALOOBOPAWOPBAMBOOM, SHAMALAMADINGDONG, DOOBOPSHOOBOP, BOOGITYBOOGITYBOOGITYSHOO, etc.
"Bush lied" has been proven to be...well......a lie.
Do dogs clean up their own crap?
I heard it mentioned last night on Scarborough by the wife of the artist who painted the flag in the toilet bowl picture which proudly hangs in Lockyer's office building in CA.
Smith told AP he protected the identity of the source he had obtained the documents from by typing copies of them on plain paper and destroying the originals.They just wanted to put doubt in people's minds about Bush. Now that they have accomplished that, they don't want anyone investigating too closely, the Dems have apparently told the media to back off this story.Upon receipt of the document in question in September 2004, Smith alleged that a Telegraph desk secretary typed it in old fashioned typewriter and then Telegraph “destroyed” their copies of the original to frustrate any future police investigation of the leak.
Faithfully, two or three times a week, the readers of our local paper and its Bush-hating columnists bring it up. The paper has never printed the contents because, toward the bottom, you would see planners were worried about WMD use. This completely undercuts the Left's interpretation of "fixed". They think in terms of elections where fixed means rigged. In the real world it can also mean "made stationary".
The Left probably realized they had gotten all the traction they could out of a reporter's "trust me" version of a Brit's impression of America's positions, prior to a meeting. The documents aren't authentic, their contents unverifiable, and their relevance questionable. Can anyone prove this individual's interpretations are more valid than anyone else's?.
They just won't let go of it.
I would suggest anyone interested read Ret. Gen. Tommy Franks' new book "American Soldier" - which sould be available at public libraries by now.
1. The original plan to invade Iraq was drawn up in 1999 when (Class -Do you know who ?)was President.
2. Degradation of Iraq's air defenses began in early-to-mid 2000, when (Class ?) was President.
3. On 11/21/01, Sec. Def. Rumsfield ordered a review and update of the Iraqi Oplan. (Oh-oh ! That (sob !) hateful Bush was in office !)
4. There were excellent reasons for the update.
5. There was and still is reason to believe WMDs WERE present in Iraq.( Oh-0h !)
I could go on, but Tommy Franks did a MUCH more comprehensive job !
Downingstreetmemo- Smoke, but where's the Fire?
various FR links & stories | 06-07-05 | the heavy equipment guy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1417955/posts