Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor In CIA Leak Case Casting A Wide Net (My Title: CIA Questioned in "Leak" Case)
Washington Post ^ | Wednesday, July 27, 2005 | Walter Pincus and Jim VandeHei

Posted on 07/26/2005 9:47:23 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide

The special prosecutor in the CIA leak probe has interviewed a wider range of administration officials than was previously known, part of an effort to determine whether anyone broke laws during a White House effort two years ago to discredit allegations that President Bush used faulty intelligence to justify the Iraq war, according to several officials familiar with the case.

Prosecutors have questioned former CIA director George J. Tenet and deputy director John E. McLaughlin, former CIA spokesman Bill Harlow, State Department officials, and even a stranger who approached columnist Robert D. Novak on the street.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; pincus; walterpincus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-247 next last
To: mystery-ak; Sam Hill

http://www.public-i.org/about/staff.aspx

Ann Pincus
Director of Communications and Outreach
Ann Pincus has over 30 years’ experience in public affairs, marketing, government relations and management. She served as director of research, first at the United States Information Agency, then the Department of State from 1993-2001, where she supervised public opinion polling and media research around the world for the U.S. government. She was vice president for communications at WETA TV-FM from 1987 to 1993; earlier she served as press secretary to Senator Charles Mathias of Maryland, a publicist for National Public Radio, and director of information for the House Select Committee on Population. She began her career as a journalist, working for the Arkansas Gazette, Ridder Newspapers, the Village Voice and the New York Post, among other publications. She is a graduate of Vassar College.



61 posted on 07/27/2005 8:00:53 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Chapter 17 - The Politics of Truth

A Strange Encounter with Robert Novak

Late on Tuesday afternoon, July 8, six days before Robert Novak’s article about Valerie and me, a friend showed up at my office with a strange and disturbing tale. He had been walking down Pennsylvania Avenue toward my office near the White House when he came upon Novak, who, my friend assumed, was en route to the George Washington University auditorium for the daily taping of CNN’s Crossfire. He asked Novak if he could walk a block or two with him, as they were headed in the same direction; Novak acquiesced. Striking up a conversation, my friend, without revealing that he knew me, asked Novak about the uranium controversy. It was a minor problem, Novak replied, and opined that the administration should have dealt with it weeks before. My friend then asked Novak what he thought about me, and Novak answered: “Wilson’s an asshole. The CIA sent him. His wife, Valerie, works for the CIA. She’s a weapons of mass destruction specialist. She sent him.” At that point, my friend and Novak went their separate ways. My friend headed straight for my office a couple of blocks away.


Once he related this unsettling story to me, I asked him to immediately write down the details of the conversation and afterwards ushered him out of my office. Next, I contacted the head of the news division at CNN, Eason Jordan, Novak’s titular boss, whom I had known for a number of years. It took several calls, but I finally tracked him down on his cell phone. I related to him the details of my friend’s encounter with Novak and pointed out that whatever my wife might or might not be, it was the height of irresponsibility for Novak to share such information with an absolute stranger on a Washington street. I asked him to speak to Novak for me, but he demurred— he said he did not know him very well—and suggested that I speak to Novak myself. I arranged for him to have Novak call me and hung up.


Novak called the next morning, but I was out, and then so was he. We did not connect until the following day, July 10. He listened quietly as I repeated to him my friend’s account of their conversation. I told him I couldn’t imagine what had possessed him to blurt out to a complete stranger what he had thought he knew about my wife. Novak apologized, and then asked if I would confirm what he had heard from a CIA source: that my wife worked at the Agency. I told him that I didn’t answer questions about my wife. I told him that my story was not about my wife or even about me; it was about sixteen words in the State of the Union address.


I then read to him three sentences from a 1990 news story about the evacuation of Baghdad: “The chief American diplomat, Joe Wilson, shepherds his flock of some 800 known Americans like a village priest. At 4:30 Sunday morning, he was helping 55 wives and children of U.S. diplomats from Kuwait load themselves and their few remaining possessions on transport for the long haul on the desert to Jordan. He shows the stuff of heroism.” The reporters who had written this, I pointed out, were Robert Novak and Rowland Evans. I suggested to Novak that he might want to check his files before writing about me. I also offered to send him all the articles I had written in the past year on policy toward Iraq so that he could educate himself on the positions I had taken. He would learn, if he took the time, that I was hardly antiwar, just anti–dumb war. Before I hung up, Novak apologized again for having spoken about Valerie to a complete stranger.


The following Monday, July 14, 2003, I read Novak’s syndicated column in the Washington Post. The sixth paragraph of the ten-paragraph story leapt out at me: “Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson’s wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report.”


http://www.politicsoftruth.com/excerpt.html


62 posted on 07/27/2005 8:07:40 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Re your #55: wouldn't it wonderful if this investigation actually reopened Chinagate and got a raft of genuine traitors caught, exposed, tried...

That is in addition to the Rats in CIA, State and MSM who tried to undermine the CIC during war....

63 posted on 07/27/2005 8:08:46 AM PDT by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
What is the point of stating the obvious? This investigation is NOT about Valerie Plame's status as a mere bureaucrat. Her ex-boss stated last week that "Valerie's undercover role started to unravel AS SOON AS SHE MET JOE WILSON." She was NOT a secret agent, Rove did NOTHING wrong or improper, it was common knowledge that she worked for the CIA.

It is also obvious that the presence of such people within the CIA is EXACTLY why the Agency became worthless during the nineties.
64 posted on 07/27/2005 8:10:14 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

"In a strange twist in the investigation, the grand jury -- acting on a tip from Wilson -- has questioned a person who approached Novak on Pennsylvania Avenue on July 8, 2003"

Probably Mark Felt ;-)


65 posted on 07/27/2005 8:10:28 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Thanks for the ping to a very interesting thread, okie.


66 posted on 07/27/2005 8:10:45 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Western Leftists have made common cause with the Islamofreaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
From several paras. down in the article: "It remains unclear whether Fitzgerald uncovered any wrongdoing in this or any other portion of his nearly 18-month investigation. All that is known at this point are the names of some people he has interviewed, what questions he has asked and whom he has focused on."

Is THAT all. Sheesh! We've got leaks upon leaks of "secret" Grand Jury info from an investigation into a leak. And we're supposed to take this investigation seriously?! All I see is wasted tax dollars.

67 posted on 07/27/2005 8:17:36 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Western Leftists have made common cause with the Islamofreaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Bump


68 posted on 07/27/2005 8:19:00 AM PDT by jdhljc169
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

lol! Oh no.... Plame sent Wilson before, and *that's* what the WH is referring to. OH HOWLING LAUGHTER. That's so cute.


69 posted on 07/27/2005 8:21:44 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
In a strange twist in the investigation, the grand jury -- acting on a tip from Wilson -- has questioned a person who approached Novak on Pennsylvania Avenue on July 8, 2003, six days before his column appeared in The Post and other publications, Wilson said in an interview.

OK. I'll come clean. It was me. Yep. I admit it. Even though I haven't left California in years, I managed to be on Pennsylania Avenue that day.

Now can we get back to what's really important? You know. Like maybe rounding up a few more Islamofreaks?

70 posted on 07/27/2005 8:21:58 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Western Leftists have made common cause with the Islamofreaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
I can't imagine Novak talking to a complete stranger

...about this matter. Bingo. He wouldn't.

71 posted on 07/27/2005 8:25:36 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Timmerman said that after several years at the U.S. Information Agency, Ann Pincus was transferred in the late 1990s to the Office of Research and Media Reaction at the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, the same office that "lost" a laptop computer loaded with highly classified intelligence documents in April 2000.

..jaw dropping. Good find, kcvl.

72 posted on 07/27/2005 8:27:12 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

So Walter Pincus is using the Post to prop up Wilson.


73 posted on 07/27/2005 8:27:15 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
In a strange twist in the investigation, the grand jury -- acting on a tip from Wilson -- has questioned a person who approached Novak on Pennsylvania Avenue on July 8, 2003, six days before his column appeared in The Post and other publications, Wilson said in an interview.

Who was having Novak tailed? I can't imagine very many ways Wilson could know this unless the "person who approached Novak" told Wilson.

74 posted on 07/27/2005 8:27:36 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Western Leftists have made common cause with the Islamofreaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
And we're supposed to take this investigation seriously?! All I see is wasted tax dollars.

Funny. I see a serious investigation of leaks that placed the national security of the United States in grave danger. Let's hope the guilty are held accountable. And as a two-fer, America gets to clean up the CIA.

75 posted on 07/27/2005 8:38:36 AM PDT by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
http://www.nndb.com/people/233/000044101/

Pincus Bio
76 posted on 07/27/2005 8:43:00 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

Check out post #35. To me it sounds like Wilson was the person who either "approached" (accosted?) Novak or arranged for the incident to happen. Think about it. Say you're involved in a confidential matter related to your job. What are the odds that somebody with intimate knowledge of the matter would randomly approach you on a street?


77 posted on 07/27/2005 8:43:21 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Western Leftists have made common cause with the Islamofreaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Of course lugs conveniently forgets that Novak explained this conversation he had with the CIA in public right after he wrote the article.
78 posted on 07/27/2005 8:47:06 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Unless his new consulting company is really a front for Joe Wilson Bond, Super-dee-duper Secret Agent Man Smart.


79 posted on 07/27/2005 8:48:38 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
So "an absolute stranger" randomly happens to bump into Robert Novak on a street in DC. And this absolute stranger just happens to be a "friend" of Joe Wilson. And Wilson's name just happens to "come up" in this chance enounter between Novak and an absolute stranger? I mean, come on...we haven't all just fallen off a turnip truck overnight, have we?
80 posted on 07/27/2005 8:50:35 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Western Leftists have made common cause with the Islamofreaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson