[Aquinasfan]

Logic, shmogic. It's not about logic. People want to reserve the right to kill their babies.

This is a straightforward fight between good and evil. Anyone who thinks that a reasonable "middle ground" can be found is kidding himself.

[Skooz]

You are absolutely correct.

Logic annihilates the "pro-choice" position. Therefore, the "pro-choicers" avoid logic and reason at all costs, and focus instead on screeching emotionalism and the subtle deception of euphamism.

The philosophical argument for "abortion rights" has been thoroughly discredited for decades. It has been all about crass emotionalism ever since.

[Mia T]

The logical point is not to change ones ethics of abortion. It is to change the focus of ones energy AND ELECTORAL SUPPORT IN 2008.

The continual pushing back of the viability of the fetus to earlier and earlier stages of development by medical science will, in the near future, render all medical abortions illegal under current law.

With technology, in a sense, overturning Roe v. Wade, it makes infinitely more sense to concentrate ones efforts saving all the children, the born and the unborn alike, by winning the war on terrorism... which means, by defeating hillary clinton or any other inept, corrupt and dangerous democrat served up by that moribund and shamelessly seditious political party.

ROE, MEDICAL SCIENCE, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, ROSS PEROT + HILLARY CLINTON