Posted on 07/27/2005 11:01:34 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
CANBERRA, July 27, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The terms "homophobia" and "intolerance" are used in the media a great deal but few have dared to define them with any certainty since they carry a weight of political baggage. Many Christian and other religious objectors to the homosexual political movement have assumed that they are defined by homosexual activists simply as, "anything or anyone that differs with us," with traditional religious morality topping the list.
A report by an Australian research group has confirmed that this view is accurate. The report by The Australia Institute, a leftist public policy think tank, was titled "Mapping Homophobia in Australia, and adheres openly to the homosexual lobby's broad definition. "In this study homophobia is identified with those who believe that homosexuality is immoral.," the report says succinctly in its preamble.
The report admits that the term is technically inaccurate, saying that few experience an actual 'phobia' about homosexuals, but that "the term 'homophobia,' is a useful term of social description for everyday emotional tension about sexual identity that is widespread among heterosexuals."
The report by the Australia Institute examined the results of a previous survey by Roy Morgan Research that asked approximately 25,000 Australians to say whether they agree or disagree with the following statements: "I believe that homosexuality is immoral," and "Homosexual couples should be allowed to adopt children." A 'yes' to the first, and a 'no' to the second equals "homophobia."
Significantly, the study notes that "Catholics are the most tolerant in Australia, with only 34 per cent believing that homosexuality is immoral." (see important statistical note at bottom of article)
Other studies have shown a strong connection between traditional sexual morality and other indicators of religious adherence such as regular church attendance. This study of "homophobia" has confirmed, perhaps unintentionally, what others have shown: that religious belief and practice by many Catholics in Australia has been seriously eroded by the new libertine sexual mores and widespread moral and religious relativism both in and out of the Catholic community.
With Catholics placed just above "no religion" in their "tolerance" of homosexuality, the study may alert Church leadership that average Catholics are, literally, one small step away from outright non-belief. Baptists, Other Christians, Methodists, Presbyterians, respondents who 'Wouldn't Say' their religion, those of 'Other Religion'(s), those identifying as "Uniting" and Anglicans all faired better according to the survey in adherence to basic Christian morality which considers homosexuality immoral.
"While Roman Catholic doctrine is seen to be clear in its condemnation of homosexuality, Catholics are the least homophobic of those Australians with a religious affiliation. This suggests that there is a gap between the official teachings of the church and the everyday beliefs and values of those people who share its faith," the report concludes.
While the study did not point it out, it should be noted that the numbers presented are based on averages and due to the fact that Catholics represent about 27 percent of the population whereas other Christian denominations are vastly smaller the actual number of Catholics considering homosexuality immoral are in many cases greater than numbers of persons of other denominations presented considering homosexuality immoral. For example even though 70% of Baptists in Australia consider homosexuality immoral compared to 35% of Catholics, due to the difference in population size among the two denominations, Catholics who consider homosexuality immoral outnumber Baptists of the same belief by a factor of eight to one.
Sakes...this crap reminds me of how the old Soviet Union used to label everyone who questioned the government as "mentally ill" and sent them off to the gulags for "therapy."
Make that: the lack of leadership in the LOCAL Church over the past thirty years.
controlling the language, the meaning of terms, equals a significant advantage in any discourse or debate
It appears the language is being perverted, also.
Psalm 16:11 Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fulness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore.
I never did like the word "homophobia" for this reason. Homo means "man" and phobia means fear. Not only am I not afraid of "man" but I am not afraid of "queers". I think they are sick and immoral but I am not afraid of them. Therefore I am not homophobic.
You make a good point. Equally valid is the view that lesbians are truly "homophobic"!
Not necessarily....
Lesbians are homophobic when only when it comes to sex.
Not the ones I know. They HATE men.
So, what's the Aussie's track record for donating chillins to the bastards? THAT'S WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT AFTER ALL!!!!!!
If I believe that cancer is a disease, does that mean I am cancerphobic?
What's a "chillin"?
"...Any questions?"
"New-Bruce, are you a Poofter?"
"Are you a Poofter?"
"No!"
"No. Right, I just want to remind you of the faculty rules: Rule One!"
"NO POOFTERS!"
"Rule Two, no member of the faculty is to maltreat the Abos in any way at all -- if there's anybody watching. Rule Three?"
"NO POOFTERS!!"
"Rule Four, now this term, I don't want to catch anybody not drinking. Rule Five ..."
"NO POOFTERS!"
"Rule Six, there is NO ... Rule Six. Rule Seven..."
"NO POOFTERS!!"
"Right, that concludes the readin' of the rules, Bruce."
As I've explained before, there can be no breaking of the rules - particularly RULE 1!
Proponents of the gay agenda are suffering from sodomophilia.
Well, the circle (or in this case unnatural cluster orgy) formally closes Down Under. This was an ultimate goal, but heretofore verbalized only as alarm at "hatred" towards "homosexuals." Moral objections were never addressed face on, but only condemned as "adjuncts" to a "real homophobia." That's still how it's happening in the USA for the most part.
Yes if you are 'afraid' of it.
Prime Choice wrote: "Sakes...this crap reminds me of how the old Soviet Union used to label everyone who questioned the government as "mentally ill" and sent them off to the gulags for "therapy.""
I have little doubt that's coming for people who are opposed to homosexuality. The Bible even predicts a time when evil will be called good and good will be called evil. It also states the world will be like Sodom and Gomorrah in the end times. It seems the world is rushing headlong into destruction. Even if millions or billions, including some so-called Christians, hold a vote and declare homosexuality and other sexual perversions OK, God is unimpressed.
Every person has a war raging within them: spirit versus flesh. At one time, those who resisted the temptations of the flesh were considered honorable. Now people would rather surrender to the flesh, and call us Christians prudes, bigots, and haters. Personally, I aspire to be more than a mere animal.
Children
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.