Posted on 07/31/2005 9:26:36 AM PDT by Righty_McRight
Ah yes...
I served at Bitburg AB from 1991-1993 just before they announced it to close down.
F-15's on Zulu alert were a awsome thing to behold.
but the 36th Fighter Wing was deactivated and now operates as the 36th Air Expeditionary Wing at Anderson AB, Guam
Evergreen International Aviation is proud to announce the development of an advanced multi-mission aircraft, the Evergreen Supertanker. This aircraft, a Boeing 747 with 24,000 gallons of tank space on board, will offer the most superior drop capabilities, safety standards and operational flexibility of any aircraft on the market. Evergreens legacy is a commitment to Quality Without Compromise. The Evergreen Supertanker is an extension of this commitment.
Areonaut Have you seen this crazy idea I like it ping your list if you want to share it
Are these F-18-G's all in the Navy/Marine inventory, or are they also to be used by the USAF?
"Prowlers" in the USAF?
What is this world coming to?
The airfoce has been using them since the EF-111 Raven was retired. (Damn shame, about the EF-111, but it was becoming expensive to operate.)
If my info is correct, an F-15 has never been shot down in battle.
But, yes, sadly it's day is over.
Boeing has mismanaged every asset and program they got when they bought McD-D, except when someone from McD-D (like Stonecipher, who moved the company to a city with NO GOOD AIRPORT, before he got caught banging -- and promoting -- some marketing bimbo) was mismanaging it.
By the way, before Stonecipher got caught with his pants down, literally, he made every single employee sign an ethics pledge. What a phony.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Does this include the C17?
Red6
Ya got me. The C-17 was a Douglas program originally, and Boeing just badly cost-overran it, they didn't actually destroy it, unlike the civil jet program or the helicopter subsidiary.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Ya got me. The C-17 was a Douglas program originally, and Boeing just badly cost-overran it, they didn't actually destroy it, unlike the civil jet program or the helicopter subsidiary.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Of course we need more of them....what kind of question is that? More F16s too.
The Nat Guard ones on Ready status have all sorts of problems.
Actually the F18 is also Boeing isn't it?
Strange how this inept Boeing seems to punch out a fighter UNDER cost UNDER time line isn't it? Is that very common?
BTW, the C17 is UNDER cost today. Or am I wrong? :)
Red6
(opinion)
Boeing bought up a lot of various firms some time ago. They DID suffer from internal organizational issues because of the turmoil created by this. The inefficiency was noticeable.
In the defense sector however Boeing has done very well, despite some of the scandals with tanker purchases etc. THE BOTTOM LINE is what matters and Boeing delivers.
If you want to see a joke, look at Europe and the EF. Ten years too late, they are now fielding a half baked marginal fighter at over cost. Hardly comparable to the F18 which was ahead of schedule and under cost and is in fact very similar to a EF (Or should I say the EF similar to the F18) in capabilities and design. Both are late fourth generation platforms with similar specs even. In fact the EF even uses a spin off from the APG65 which they renamed.
BTW, Boeing is already making a come back in the civil market in Asia and the Middle East. On top of that, though old news, 9-11 did have a profound impact on our economy more so that say Germany or GB. Despite subsidies, protectionist practices of much of Europe, Boeing will push itself through out of the shear fact that its a private competitively based firm that is bottom line focused. Outside of Europe and the Airbus zone (Those nations that subsidies and fund Airbus will buy Airbus for their state run airlines, its not even a question) Boeing will do good. Inside the Airbus zone Boeing will get the crumbs from small carriers like Ryan air that are private. I stated this before elsewhere; in Europe you have pseudo-market economies. Lufthansa, the state owned airline will buy Airbus the state subsidized airplane and will park it in hangers at Frankfurt, the state owned airport which is now building hangers that are partially indirectly funded with tax revenue. Do you really think that the loss of much of the sales in Europe is out of shear competitive reasons? Hardly. Lufthansa, Air France and others will buy the A380 no matter what! The loss of market share in Europe is a result of Europe closing off its market, not just competition.
Red6
Well,
They are already BUILDING (Production/no test or prototype) major components for the JSF. At Ft Worth TX everything is already rolling into place for large scale production. Stop embarrassing yourself at this point. We all remember you retarded posts in the past!
Red6
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.