As I posted on another thread about this:
I see from a number of the posts on this thread that the left's smear tactic campaign is working.
Has anybody asked him why he did it? Has anybody done research on the case? Maybe there was some actual discrimination going on, above and beyond what the homos usually complain about? Has anybody asked him if he thought it was a mistake?
You people sure are quick to act on this, aren't you.
was he even ON the case?
for all we know the only thing he did was correct language.
Was his name on the brief?
If his name was not on the brief, then he was not the attorny for the case. The help given could have been as much as a rewrite or as little as lending a pencil.
Right you are. I thought we were smarter than that.
It's a "smear" only if it's not true. Is it not true that Roberts helped the gay-rights lawyers in the Romer case? If that's not true, the newspaper is going to have to issue a retraction. If it is true, then you can't call it a smear.