SEPARATED AT CONCEPTION
 |
 |
Posted on 08/04/2005 8:48:41 AM PDT by kennedy
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX
NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN
**Exclusive**
The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES' newsroom to look into the adoption of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.
The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.
Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.
Both children were adopted from Latin America.
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoptions are part of the paper's "standard background check."
Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.
Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Josie’s and Jack’s mother had them wear at the announcement ceremony.
One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES’ plans declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”
One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”
Developing...
Did you know that John Kerry was in Vietnam? (Sorry....compulsive response.)
Hmmmmm...seems that the Chelsea Clinton standard no longer applies...
----
Of course not. The Slimes is a filthy instrument of the filthy left which still insists on THE LIBERAL DOUBLE STANDARD. When will the Repubs learn how to fight back? They should make a public spectacle out of what the Slimes is trying to do. Absolutely scream bloody murder, foul, character assassination, all of it....but the wimps never do. They just let the libs P@ss all over them and don't fight back.
Disgusting. Especially with our Republic at stake.
I think you are on to something.......
Exactly so. Those blond kids are obviously Nazi experiments.
Somebody authoritative (starting with Judge Roberts) needs to speak out powerfully and denounce this new low in --- I hesitate to put it in the category of journalism. The people responsible should be fired out of a *-----* cannon.
What a bunch of unmitigated crap.
And this is relevant to his judicial ability HOW? This is getting ridiculous!
Both children were adopted from Latin America.
Do I just have no eye for ethnicity, or don't the kids look more Northern European than Latin? They don't look Hispanic or Indian, and I don't think blond hair is frequent even among the white upper class to our South.
Watch, somebody will dig up or fake something unsavory about the adoption agency's methods. I suppose "glutton for punishment" must be added to the requirements for any Supreme Court nominee.>>>>>>>>
Just curious, why, or how are they from Latin America? Maybe I'm just ignorant, there must be a lot of white folks down there.
Bloggers can tear apart his life as well. I wouldn't be surprised if we find all kinds of devils in that closet!!
"The kids were dressed perfectly, unlike the womans field hockey team, whose members mostly wore flip-flops to meet the President."
I agree and saw NOTHING "wrong" with the way the kids were dressed.
They looked like an average middle class family going to church.....
Oh, there's the problem in LIBERAL eyes.
They looked like AMERICA!!!!!!
No problem. We will find all the i's dotted and the t's crossed. This would have been a legal issue and I'm sure the judge was able to satisfactorily deal with all of that. I'm also sure he was vetted more than once for various jobs, one of which was a circuit appointment a few years ago.
If anything, the NYT could buy off poor folks in Latin America to claim wrongdoing/extortion/pressure in allowing the children to be adopted.
That might be one avenue of approach to close off right away.
This is a new low even for the New York Slimes. Clinton's Oval Office sex was his "private life" according to media Democratic parrots, but Roberts' adoption of two children that's fair game according to the Slimes. I'm sure the lefty twits at the Slimes are just pissed off Roberts' adopted children weren't just aborted by the mothers.
...better yet, they didn't put on the application the middle initial of wife's mother's maiden name on the adoption papers, therefore it was an attempt to hide who really was the wife's mother's families, vet's receptionist's cousin, twice removed... something in the past about someone... anyone... that's ever uttered Mr. Robert's name.
If you dig deep enough into anyone on Earth, we're all associated with, or related to, or something with someone like a Nazi or Pontius Pilate...
amazing
I can imagine them searching for some sort of loophole that benefitted Roberts...but then finding nothing and reporting that Jack's biological mom was a whore.
Then they'll justify it by thinking that, if they couldn't stop him, they could weaken him (by attacking his kids), ala John Bolton.
Truly sickening.
bump
Here ya go: nytnews@nytimes.com public@nytimes.com
1-888-NYT-NEWS
(212) 556-7652
I've already called!!!
Here ya go: nytnews@nytimes.com public@nytimes.com
1-888-NYT-NEWS
(212) 556-7652
I've already called!!!
"Why not do the same on the owners of the NYSlime, the Sultzbergers? "
Karmic. Kinda like eminent domain and Souter?
Make that "standard republican background check.".
|
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.