To: ken5050
What's unusual is that Drudge named the reporter involved..there is another agenda at work here..Yep - the Times wanted this made public - now the question becomes why. So far the intimidation angle is the one that makes the most sense.
131 posted on
08/04/2005 9:19:19 AM PDT by
CFC__VRWC
("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
To: CFC__VRWC; ken5050
163 posted on
08/04/2005 9:26:06 AM PDT by
Rise of South Park Republicans
(The Founding Fathers wanted disagreements as long as we all agree America kicks as* - Eric Cartman)
To: CFC__VRWC; ken5050; Mo1
What's unusual is that Drudge named the reporter involved..there is another agenda at work here.. Yep - the Times wanted this made public - now the question becomes why. So far the intimidation angle is the one that makes the most sense.
Drudge has some buds or budettes over at the times who slip him leads fairly often.. You'll note a lot of them occur before his radio show on Sunday evening... Thus my guess is that they wanted this out and and Drudge is the convenient mouthpiece for them.
Drudge Report has uncovered...... lol. It really has to make you laugh.
219 posted on
08/04/2005 9:42:31 AM PDT by
deport
(If you want something bad enough, there's someone who will sell it to you. Even the truth your way.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson