Posted on 08/04/2005 10:19:56 AM PDT by Zender500
For years the National Education Association has taken teacher dues money and pursued left-of-center social advocacy objectives. Now another acronym in the American educational establishment — the National Parent Teacher Association (PTA) — has joined the NEA in choosing sides in the cultural debate over homosexuality in the schools.
As detailed by George Archibald in the Washington Times (but ignored by the rest of the national media), last year the PTA invited the group Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) to exhibit at the PTA convention and to make a presentation. This year, the Parent and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX) wanted to share its perspective on homosexuality and school safety but was denied exhibit space at the PTA’s June convention in Columbus, Ohio. Specifically, the PTA defended its decision by saying that PFLAG was being invited to present information concerning school safety, while PFOX wanted to talk about homosexuality. This reasoning is disingenuous since PFOX was also going to present information about school issues.
One thing is sure: PFLAG and PFOX differ in their approaches to the issues. In the Washington Times article Ron Schlittler, PFLAG’s assistant executive director, lauded the PTA for excluding PFOX and not surprisingly added, “Our beliefs are superior.” Apparently, the PTA agrees.
What exactly are these “superior” beliefs? A sampling of positions PFLAG has taken this year may cause mainstream folks to question the PTA’s wisdom. For starters, in mid-June PFLAG distributed an alert calling for families with “gay children” from the ages of nine through 15 to be a part of a documentary produced by a company called World of Wonder. Gay children? I am not making this up. I verified the e-mail and found that it was sent by assistant executive director Schlittler. So here are two beliefs: PFLAG believes that children can be gay at age nine, and that they should go on camera to talk about it. Are these beliefs superior? You decide.
PFLAG’s support for this film project demonstrates that ideas have consequences. PFLAG’s policies are driven by the belief that homosexuality derives exclusively from nature, with no room for theories that put any emphasis on environment. Why else would you believe it was ethical to encourage children to view themselves as gay at such a young age? Is this the message we want in the nation’s elementary schools?
Another consequence of PFLAG’s beliefs is that people have no rights to pursue change in sexual identity if they desire. According to the Washington Times article, PFLAG’s Schlittler belittled those who believe in such self-determination by calling it “snake oil.”
Another PFLAG belief reveals an irony of the group’s involvement in the PTA conference. PFLAG does not support anti-bullying legislation unless the terms “sexual orientation” and “transgendered” are in the bill. The PTA conference was held in Ohio, where at the time legislation was under consideration that would require all school districts to implement anti-bullying policies. However, House Bill 276 would provide protection for all students — not just those bullied for reasons relating to their sexual identification. PFLAG is on record as opposing such legislation.
So let’s recap: PFLAG believes children can self identify their gayness by at least age nine; children should go on camera to discuss it; homosexuality is fixed and hardwired; and anti-bullying laws are inadequate without reference to sexual orientation.
Now where does PFOX come down on these matters? Did the PTA choose well? Are the views of PFOX inferior to those of PFLAG?
For one thing, PFOX also planned to exhibit material regarding school safety and homosexuality. The perspective of PFOX is that all students — including those who identify as gay — deserve a safe learning environment. Furthermore, students at an appropriate developmental level deserve to hear all perspectives regarding homosexuality, including the view that sexual orientation is not a fixed trait. Nine-year-olds should not be burdened with such matters.
We have here the starkest contrast of perspectives on an educational matter as I have ever seen. Faced with these different perspectives, the PTA could have invited both groups to the conference and let the parents attending decide what approach best fits their schools.
Dr. Throckmorton is an associate professor of psychology at Grove City College in Pennsylvania.
"This is the pfolice...."
Aww pflug! Ya got me...I'll cop a pflea.
"This is the pfolice...."
Aww pflug! Ya got me...I'll cop a pflea.
Alright, but don't pflea the area even if it itches.
ROFL!
Whatever happened to the P in the PTA?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.