Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia plans flight to Mars and development of space tourism
RIA Novosti ^ | 04/ 08/ 2005

Posted on 08/04/2005 11:19:43 AM PDT by jb6

MOSCOW, August 4 (RIA Novosti) - Russia will start an experimental program for preparation for flights to Mars in 2006, said Anatoly Perminov, head of the Russian Space Agency Roscosmos.

"The agency is not planning a manned flight to Mars until 2015, although we will start an experimental program at the Institute of Medical and Biological Research next year," he told the Voice of Russia state-controlled radio station. "An international six-men crew will conduct a simulated 500-day flight to Mars."

Perminov said Russia would send a probe to Phobos, one of Mars' two moons, to test launch, landing and take-off procedures, soil sampling and practice the return flight to Earth.

Perminov also said Russia planned to continue its space tourism program.

"First of all, it is a way to finance the future development of the space program and secondly, it gives people without serious training the opportunity to make a space trip," he said.

Perminov said the flights to the International Space Station offered by Roscosmos were safer than sub-orbital flights advertised in the United States.

Perminov also described Russia's plans for strategic development of space research and exploration.

He mentioned space exploration, manned space flights and deep space scientific research among long term prospects and called the creation or modernization of an orbital group of satellites for various purposes, especially telecommunication satellites, a short-term priority.

"The agency can successfully achieve its long-term goals only through international cooperation," he said.

Perminov also said Russia was developing the Clipper space shuttle to combine the reliability of the Soyuz spacecraft and the comfort of U.S. space shuttles and feature increased cargo capacity.

The new spacecraft is designed to carry a six-man crew, including a pilot, an engineer and four passengers or researchers. It will be capable of 24 flights


TOPICS: Russia
KEYWORDS: business; mars; phonybaloney; roscosmos; russia; space; tourism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2005 11:19:44 AM PDT by jb6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jb6

?.....Russia plans flight to Mars and development of Gulag?


2 posted on 08/04/2005 11:21:06 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

The things we could do if our president had the balls to put our mars ambitions into action.


3 posted on 08/04/2005 11:21:43 AM PDT by kharaku (G3 (http://www.cobolsoundsystem.com/mp3s/unreleased/evewasanape.mp3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Perminov's head is filled with permafrost.


4 posted on 08/04/2005 11:23:20 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kharaku

I love when NASA complains that no one is interested in the public in what they do: yes putting up satellites and standard shuttle flights are just sooooo exciting. Do something cool (like the comet impact) and you'll generate support.


5 posted on 08/04/2005 11:23:45 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Why? Even the Indians and Chinese are working on catching up with NASA and what is there to catch up to?


6 posted on 08/04/2005 11:24:30 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jb6

A new Space Race. And one we should easily win, if we have the national will.


7 posted on 08/04/2005 11:25:02 AM PDT by Tatze (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6
I wonder how a nation that couldn't land a man on the moon is supposed to have any credibility in its claim that it can get anyone to Mars.
8 posted on 08/04/2005 11:25:28 AM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6
the Russian Space Agency Roscosmos.

Do they call that "Rosco" for short?

9 posted on 08/04/2005 11:26:51 AM PDT by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6
I love when NASA complains that no one is interested in the public in what they do

Answer me this without looking it up: who was the mission commander of the space shuttle that went up and successfully landed prior to the Columbia disaster?

Answer me this without looking it up: who was the fourth man to walk on the moon?

And finally, answer me this: do you honestly think that NASA just whimsically ended its Apollo program? Or was it forced to end because the American public lost interest and Congress thus cut NASA's funding?

Your answers tell the whole story.

10 posted on 08/04/2005 11:27:49 AM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
More of a choice not to land a man by the Soviets. Russia's space agency is heavily business interested (aka the whole tourism angle) vs a bureaucratic and elitist NASA. As a pro-business person, who do you think will win?
11 posted on 08/04/2005 11:29:37 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kharaku
The things we could do if our president had the balls to put our mars ambitions into action.

Unfortunately, our government is too busy codding illegal aliens, sucking up resources into social programs, and propagandizing that Islam is a "religion of peace" to bother with incentives for the space program.

12 posted on 08/04/2005 11:30:25 AM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Gluttons for punishment...

Martian moon Phobos and "Phobos Mystery Object", photographed in 1989 by a Russian spacecraft not long before all contact was lost.

13 posted on 08/04/2005 11:31:38 AM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6
More of a choice not to land a man by the Soviets.

Bull. Russia couldn't do it. Hell, it wasn't until after we had landed men on the moon several times that Russia managed to get a probe on the moon.

Russia's space agency is heavily business interested (aka the whole tourism angle)

Sure...and the average guy has $100,000,000.00 to spare for such a journey.

What crap. Russia isn't "business interested"; its space agency is starved for cash and is desperately soliciting funding. Hell, the American government has been propping Russia's space agency for years.

14 posted on 08/04/2005 11:34:00 AM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LRS

Care to elaberate the story?


15 posted on 08/04/2005 11:34:41 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Just great.

Aeroflot in a vacuum.

16 posted on 08/04/2005 11:36:00 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LRS

When Russian scientists toured a facility I was visiting, all present were sternly warned not to bring up Phobos. It was a real sore point with the Russkies.


17 posted on 08/04/2005 11:36:37 AM PDT by Prime Choice (Thanks to the Leftists, yesterday's deviants are today's "alternate lifestyles.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Propping Russia's space agency? Who the hell do you think was feeding our guy on the space station when NASA took a break from sending rockets to space? If not for the Russian Agency our guy would be dead now.


18 posted on 08/04/2005 11:37:24 AM PDT by kharaku (G3 (http://www.cobolsoundsystem.com/mp3s/unreleased/evewasanape.mp3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Sure...and the average guy has $100,000,000.00 to spare for such a journey.

First, it's $20 million to go up (and if you haven't figured it out there are plenty of people with the cash and the will to go), the $100 million was proposed for a lunar fly by. Cash starved is a good reason to go pro-business, or are you rather on the lets subsidize everything with tax payers expense kind? We give NASA a billion a year and what do we get? The first launch in 2 years almost turns into a trajedy and is already a national embaressment.

NASA went bonkers when Tito was planning to go up, screaming that no "civilian" was fit to go and only the properly trained "elites". WRONG. The inbreeding at NASA is why we're sucking.

19 posted on 08/04/2005 11:38:12 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson