Hey, I fear that a more liberal justice will continue the unchecked slaughter of the unborn. Does my side of the issue have any standing or am I just an intolerant jackal.
There is NO right to privacy!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1456856/posts?q=1&&page=550#550
"We are gravely concerned this new information could indicate John Roberts holds a hostile position on the fundamental right to privacy."
Well duh! We conservatives are coming back at you with full force! You've murdered over 45 million innocent lives! We won't allow it anymore!
Let's just hope John Paul Stevens resigns and then we can get another good conservative on the court and really freak the liberals out!
But Ann Coulter said the libs have nothing to worry about... ;)
If the Constitution is a "living breathing document" why can't we consider Roe v. Wade being a "living breathing" decision?
seems like there is more fear of him here
So? Conservatives not only 'fear' but already experienced hostile liberal judges.
Not likely, we've already proven here that he's a pansy and a liberal..or is that redundant.
It isn't necessary to argue against abortion by arguing against a right to privacy. An unborn baby is a separate and distinct individual from the mother. There are no rational arguments against this. What we are really talking about is whether this individual member of the Human Race has a right to live or is no more than personal property until it magically obtains this right by virture of a trip down the birth canal.