Skip to comments.
'POST-IT' BLUNDER
NY POST ^
Posted on 08/10/2005 3:40:39 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002
'POST-IT' BLUNDER
By IAN BISHOP
http://www.nypost.com/photos/news08102005012.jpg
August 10, 2005 -- WASHINGTON Military spies were forced to slap "stickies on the face of Mohamed Atta" and other 9/11 hijackers despite knowing where they were in the United States...
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abledanger; clintonlegacy; gorelick; sandyberger; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-68 next last
To: All
2
posted on
08/10/2005 3:42:04 PM PDT
by
MaineVoter2002
(http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html)
To: MaineVoter2002
Does anybody have the pager number for Jamie Gorelick?
3
posted on
08/10/2005 3:42:24 PM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Join the AmishDude fan club: "ROFLOL!" -- tuliptree76)
To: MaineVoter2002

Huh? That looks like a whole stack of post-it's..
To: MaineVoter2002
OMG...thanks to Jamie Gorelick no doubt. I wonder if she's related to Al Gore, and if there's something to that.
5
posted on
08/10/2005 3:44:16 PM PDT
by
benjibrowder
(Who doesn't want to read the FR 24/7/365?)
To: AmishDude
6
posted on
08/10/2005 3:44:53 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: Michael Barnes
Not that it matters if he was here legally or not.
7
posted on
08/10/2005 3:45:21 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: MaineVoter2002
And just who was President in 1999?
Umm, yes that's right X42, Clintigula himself.
Oh, no mention of that in the article ?
surprise, surprise, surprise.
8
posted on
08/10/2005 3:45:53 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: benjibrowder
Savage is speaking on this now.
9
posted on
08/10/2005 3:45:57 PM PDT
by
Burf
To: AmishDude
I have a feeling we're going to be hearing her name a lot in the future.
10
posted on
08/10/2005 3:46:25 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: MaineVoter2002
Jamie Gorelick, a deputy attorney general under former President Bill Clinton and a commission member, codified the separation between investigative and intelligence agencies in a 1995 memo. Jamie Gorelick...a pox on your head and your bloody hands!
11
posted on
08/10/2005 3:46:59 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: AmishDude
But Weldon suggested Able Danger's explosive findings had been hidden from commission members. Sandy Burglar, please pick up the white courtesy phone, Sandy Burlgar...."
12
posted on
08/10/2005 3:47:45 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)
To: MaineVoter2002
He claimed Pentagon lawyers rejected the recommendation because they mistakenly believed that since Atta and the others were in the country legally on visas, they could not be investigated. What's the proper penalty for these lawyers for their mistake? Nothing?
To: mware
14
posted on
08/10/2005 3:50:10 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: AmishDude
Wasn't it Jamie Gorelick that implemented the policy that intellegence can't tell the FBI about stuff?
And wasn't this just about the time that Charlie Tree was funneling money into the Clinton coffers? Something that likeley was known by intelligence, but they were prohibited by law from handling as a felony charge.
9/11 has Bill Clinton f#ckup written all over it.
15
posted on
08/10/2005 3:51:00 PM PDT
by
narby
(There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
To: MizSterious
Thanks I have been looking for this for 15 minutes.
16
posted on
08/10/2005 3:51:17 PM PDT
by
mware
(Now we know why the NYT didn't have time to cover AIR AMERIKA)
To: ncountylee
Jamie Gorelick, a deputy attorney general under former President Bill Clinton and a commission member, codified the separation between investigative and intelligence agencies in a 1995 memo. Jamie Gorelick...a pox on your head and your bloody hands!
She had to do it, how else could she protect Clinton and his Chinese campaign contributors?
/S
17
posted on
08/10/2005 3:51:45 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: cripplecreek
I have a feeling we're going to be hearing her name a lot in the future.As in an investigation for her past malfeasance, or as a confidant in a future Hillary administration?
To: cripplecreek
I've just heard snippets about this..still trying to catch up on what's going on..
To: Michael Barnes
Perhaps should read "Off limits - Participant in Jamie Gorelick's Terrorist Protection Program"
Time to rip the covers off this cover-up!
20
posted on
08/10/2005 3:56:39 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: Burf
Is there an online link for savage on the air?
To: All
Open borders (borders?), P.C., win the battles there lose the war here (VN all over again), enemies within demanding their "rights," Davos world, globalism, you name it -- now this. (Gee, I wonder what else is there.)
It's time for the Pentagon military to run an idea past federal, state, and local law enforcement. . .
"Washington civilians have proved that few of them care. What if we took over."
Just a boyhood dream of mine since the days of Alger Hiss and his powerful commie and com-symp buddies' heyday.
Let's get it over with. Clean house. There is no other way. That "domestic enemies" thing -- that's still in the oath isn't it?
To: Pearls Before Swine
As in an investigation for her past malfeasance, or as a confidant in a future Hillary administration?Both. Isnt the former a requirement for the latter?
23
posted on
08/10/2005 3:57:45 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)
To: mware; Howlin; All
This bears repeating:
But Weldon suggested Able Danger's explosive findings had been hidden from commission members.
"Let's put the intelligence folks under oath and let them be cross-examined. And let's put the staffers on the 9/11 commission under oath and let those under oath tell what information they gave," Weldon said.
Someone sure tried to hide this. Since Gorelick "codified" the separation between agencies, and since a lot of the 9/11 blood is on her hands, I can't help but think she was the blocker, or one of her scurrying little rat underlings.
24
posted on
08/10/2005 3:58:53 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: benjibrowder
How in the world did Gorelick get on the 9/11 commission.
She was one of the people who should have been under investigation!
25
posted on
08/10/2005 3:59:16 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: narby
26
posted on
08/10/2005 3:59:36 PM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Join the AmishDude fan club: "ROFLOL!" -- tuliptree76)
To: RJL
She had to protect herself, too. She was the author of that abomination of a memo.
27
posted on
08/10/2005 3:59:37 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: cardinal4
Isnt the former a requirement for the latter?Not necessarily, although I could see how it might be viewed as a sign of past loyalty. The big H could pull a brand new radical from her hat.
To: 68skylark
"He claimed Pentagon lawyers rejected the recommendation because they mistakenly believed that since Atta and the others were in the country legally on visas, they could not be investigated."
Clintonista lawyers cluttered up all the relevant departments - has Bush cleaned house yet?? Would these be any of the same "Pentagon lawyers" who were still around in 2001, fussing over whether we could take out key Al Qaeda and Taliban terrorists in Afghanistan with Predator's Hellfire missiles? I seem to recall we may have missed some good opportunities in Oct-Nov. 2001 as the lawyers fretted about what we were allowed to do to the bastards.
29
posted on
08/10/2005 4:01:00 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: Pearls Before Swine
"...or as a confidant in a future Hillary administration?"
Confidant, hell...more likely a Cabinet member.
To: MaineVoter2002
To: ncountylee
Jamie Gorelick, a deputy attorney general under former President Bill Clinton and a commission member, codified the separation between investigative and intelligence agencies in a 1995 memo.
.... in order to prevent communication between the CIA and FBI over reported interactions regarding the transfer of high technology to China and their relation to campaign fundraising efforts by the Clinton Whitehouse.
To: Enchante
Of course this latest Clintonista gaffe will be the lead story tomorrow morning on all the Networks. Im sure accusations of Clintonista malfeasence will be all over the NYT in the morning, too. Coupled with a collective wail of betrayal from the Left..
33
posted on
08/10/2005 4:06:35 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)
To: MaineVoter2002
34
posted on
08/10/2005 4:06:58 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: MizSterious
I'm willing to bet that there is another angle to all of this that has yet to be revealed....
The Clinton administration mucked about with the Immigration and Naturalization requirements to a faretheewell. I was aware of it in relation to the 1996 and 2000 elections, they were packing in the foreign naitonals to fill up the Democrat voting sheets.
Interesting that these guys all came into the country during the 90's. Also interesting that so much info was available on their activites right after 9/11. Coincidence?
What was the woman's name who ran the Immigration office... her husband was killed on the flight that took out Ron Brown...
Pinz
To: Michael Barnes
36
posted on
08/10/2005 4:11:10 PM PDT
by
philo
(They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist. . . . Union General John Sedgwick last words)
To: pinz-n-needlez
To: TomGuy
Weldon was just on Mark Levin's show. Said news tomorrow is 9-11 Commission is flip flopping on being briefed on Able Danger and Atta, now admitting it (apparently staffers did not want to go under oath against patriot agents). Sandy Bergler mentioned too, but just speculation. Also said info came from an "open source", i.e., NOT prohibitted by Gorelick Wall. It appears that the assumption is staffers did not report to Commission members. Methinks not to all but to some and Ben Veniste and Gorelick nixed it. This one may have some legs and reveal the truth. Weldon sounds like he is just getting started. Here's hoping hearings follow...
38
posted on
08/10/2005 4:11:31 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: MizSterious
She had to protect herself, too. She was the author of that abomination of a memo.
There is suggestive data that she was instrumental in the memo to the FBI officials in OKC shortly after the Murrah bombing instructing the FBI to drop the investigation of potential foreign involvement in Murrah. Jayne Davis has written extensively on this topic.
Dots all over the map. And if they ever get connected, it would send several presidencies -- both Democrat and Republican -- into history's toilet.
39
posted on
08/10/2005 4:12:34 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy; pinz-n-needlez
Good points, and I hadn't thought yet about the OKC connections. Read Pinz's post #35 too--yet more dots to connect.
40
posted on
08/10/2005 4:16:18 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: eureka!
Ben Veniste and Gorelick nixed it
Ben Veniste and Gorelick were NOT on that 9-11 Committee just because they didn't have anything else to do during those months. No. Ben Veniste and Gorelick were put on the commission by Clinton to make sure the fingers didn't point to him. Just like Sandy Bergler went to the National Archives to retrieve and destroy specific, incriminating documents.
And the Bush admin is being derelict in doing nothing about these criminal, and possibly treasonous, actions.
41
posted on
08/10/2005 4:18:18 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Burf
One time I heard a story from Savage that they were going to stop Atta or other 911 terrorists (I think at an airport) perhaps here in Maine but the security officer was warned by another not to stop him or they would hear from the ACLU. Did you hear that story on Savage?
You have a link to that story?
http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html
42
posted on
08/10/2005 4:20:14 PM PDT
by
MaineVoter2002
(http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html)
To: TomGuy
"
And the Bush admin is being derelict in doing nothing about these criminal, and possibly treasonous, actions."I'm with you. However, there may be some strategery at play here. What I can't figure is why the NY Slimes broke the story. In any event, sure makes the 9-11 Commission look like idiots or, in the case of the two you mentioned, cover up hacks (or worse)...
43
posted on
08/10/2005 4:24:12 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Good evening.
"Washington civilians have proved that few of them care. What if we took over."
That's just what every constitutional republic needs, a military/police take over.
Isn't that what those brilliant guys that set this country up came up the 2nd Amendment for, just in case the Generals and their puppet politicians decided they could do a better job.
Michael Frazier
44
posted on
08/10/2005 4:24:45 PM PDT
by
brazzaville
(No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: TomGuy
Ben Veniste and Gorelick were put on the commission by Clinton to make sure the fingers didn't point to him. Can you refresh my memory on this? Why was Clinton able to put people on the 9-11 commission?
And I agree that there's something very odd about Bush in that he first protects Sandy Burglar after Burglar stole those documents from the National Archives, then doesn't pursue these activities.
To: eureka!
I'm with you. However, there may be some strategery at play here Maybe you can help me with this.
What would that strategy be, and for what purpose?
To: MaineVoter2002
It is not as if we all did not already know that BS such as this has been going on in our government forever.
47
posted on
08/10/2005 4:28:03 PM PDT
by
Radix
(I was looking for a Tag Line when I found this one!)
To: Michael Barnes
Kern Radio streaming. Sorry it took so long to get back
48
posted on
08/10/2005 4:28:20 PM PDT
by
Burf
To: MaineVoter2002
Try this
www.gsnmagazine.com
49
posted on
08/10/2005 4:31:54 PM PDT
by
Burf
To: skip_intro
"What would that strategy be, and for what purpose?"Upon reflection, poor choice of words as I doubt the WH has anything to do with this. Weldon made it sound like there were some patriots that wanted the truth out and he's doing so. Thanks....
50
posted on
08/10/2005 4:34:16 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson