Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'POST-IT' BLUNDER
NY POST ^

Posted on 08/10/2005 3:40:39 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002

'POST-IT' BLUNDER

By IAN BISHOP

http://www.nypost.com/photos/news08102005012.jpg

August 10, 2005 -- WASHINGTON — Military spies were forced to slap "stickies on the face of Mohamed Atta" and other 9/11 hijackers — despite knowing where they were in the United States...

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abledanger; clintonlegacy; gorelick; sandyberger; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last
To: All

http://www.nypost.com/photos/news08102005012.jpg


2 posted on 08/10/2005 3:42:04 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

Does anybody have the pager number for Jamie Gorelick?


3 posted on 08/10/2005 3:42:24 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "ROFLOL!" -- tuliptree76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

Huh? That looks like a whole stack of post-it's..

4 posted on 08/10/2005 3:43:32 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

OMG...thanks to Jamie Gorelick no doubt. I wonder if she's related to Al Gore, and if there's something to that.


5 posted on 08/10/2005 3:44:16 PM PDT by benjibrowder (Who doesn't want to read the FR 24/7/365?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Dial M for Murder?


6 posted on 08/10/2005 3:44:53 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Not that it matters if he was here legally or not.


7 posted on 08/10/2005 3:45:21 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

And just who was President in 1999?
Umm, yes that's right X42, Clintigula himself.
Oh, no mention of that in the article ?
surprise, surprise, surprise.


8 posted on 08/10/2005 3:45:53 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

Savage is speaking on this now.


9 posted on 08/10/2005 3:45:57 PM PDT by Burf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

I have a feeling we're going to be hearing her name a lot in the future.


10 posted on 08/10/2005 3:46:25 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002
Jamie Gorelick, a deputy attorney general under former President Bill Clinton and a commission member, codified the separation between investigative and intelligence agencies in a 1995 memo.

Jamie Gorelick...a pox on your head and your bloody hands!

11 posted on 08/10/2005 3:46:59 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
But Weldon suggested Able Danger's explosive findings had been hidden from commission members.

Sandy Burglar, please pick up the white courtesy phone, Sandy Burlgar...."

12 posted on 08/10/2005 3:47:45 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002
He claimed Pentagon lawyers rejected the recommendation because they mistakenly believed that since Atta and the others were in the country legally on visas, they could not be investigated.

What's the proper penalty for these lawyers for their mistake? Nothing?

13 posted on 08/10/2005 3:48:36 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

Ping!


14 posted on 08/10/2005 3:50:10 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Wasn't it Jamie Gorelick that implemented the policy that intellegence can't tell the FBI about stuff?

And wasn't this just about the time that Charlie Tree was funneling money into the Clinton coffers? Something that likeley was known by intelligence, but they were prohibited by law from handling as a felony charge.

9/11 has Bill Clinton f#ckup written all over it.

15 posted on 08/10/2005 3:51:00 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Thanks I have been looking for this for 15 minutes.


16 posted on 08/10/2005 3:51:17 PM PDT by mware (Now we know why the NYT didn't have time to cover AIR AMERIKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Jamie Gorelick, a deputy attorney general under former President Bill Clinton and a commission member, codified the separation between investigative and intelligence agencies in a 1995 memo.

Jamie Gorelick...a pox on your head and your bloody hands!

She had to do it, how else could she protect Clinton and his Chinese campaign contributors?

/S

17 posted on 08/10/2005 3:51:45 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I have a feeling we're going to be hearing her name a lot in the future.

As in an investigation for her past malfeasance, or as a confidant in a future Hillary administration?

18 posted on 08/10/2005 3:54:36 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I've just heard snippets about this..still trying to catch up on what's going on..


19 posted on 08/10/2005 3:55:20 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Perhaps should read "Off limits - Participant in Jamie Gorelick's Terrorist Protection Program"

Time to rip the covers off this cover-up!


20 posted on 08/10/2005 3:56:39 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Burf

Is there an online link for savage on the air?


21 posted on 08/10/2005 3:56:46 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
Open borders (borders?), P.C., win the battles there lose the war here (VN all over again), enemies within demanding their "rights," Davos world, globalism, you name it -- now this. (Gee, I wonder what else is there.)

It's time for the Pentagon military to run an idea past federal, state, and local law enforcement. . .

"Washington civilians have proved that few of them care. What if we took over."

Just a boyhood dream of mine since the days of Alger Hiss and his powerful commie and com-symp buddies' heyday.

Let's get it over with. Clean house. There is no other way. That "domestic enemies" thing -- that's still in the oath isn't it?

22 posted on 08/10/2005 3:57:29 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
As in an investigation for her past malfeasance, or as a confidant in a future Hillary administration?

Both. Isnt the former a requirement for the latter?

23 posted on 08/10/2005 3:57:45 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mware; Howlin; All
This bears repeating:

But Weldon suggested Able Danger's explosive findings had been hidden from commission members.

"Let's put the intelligence folks under oath and let them be cross-examined. And let's put the staffers on the 9/11 commission under oath and let those under oath tell what information they gave," Weldon said.

Someone sure tried to hide this. Since Gorelick "codified" the separation between agencies, and since a lot of the 9/11 blood is on her hands, I can't help but think she was the blocker, or one of her scurrying little rat underlings.

24 posted on 08/10/2005 3:58:53 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder
How in the world did Gorelick get on the 9/11 commission.

She was one of the people who should have been under investigation!
25 posted on 08/10/2005 3:59:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: narby

Right on all counts.


26 posted on 08/10/2005 3:59:36 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "ROFLOL!" -- tuliptree76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RJL
She had to protect herself, too. She was the author of that abomination of a memo.
27 posted on 08/10/2005 3:59:37 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Isnt the former a requirement for the latter?

Not necessarily, although I could see how it might be viewed as a sign of past loyalty. The big H could pull a brand new radical from her hat.

28 posted on 08/10/2005 4:00:42 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"He claimed Pentagon lawyers rejected the recommendation because they mistakenly believed that since Atta and the others were in the country legally on visas, they could not be investigated."

Clintonista lawyers cluttered up all the relevant departments - has Bush cleaned house yet?? Would these be any of the same "Pentagon lawyers" who were still around in 2001, fussing over whether we could take out key Al Qaeda and Taliban terrorists in Afghanistan with Predator's Hellfire missiles? I seem to recall we may have missed some good opportunities in Oct-Nov. 2001 as the lawyers fretted about what we were allowed to do to the bastards.
29 posted on 08/10/2005 4:01:00 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

"...or as a confidant in a future Hillary administration?"

Confidant, hell...more likely a Cabinet member.


30 posted on 08/10/2005 4:02:52 PM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

31 posted on 08/10/2005 4:05:20 PM PDT by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Jamie Gorelick, a deputy attorney general under former President Bill Clinton and a commission member, codified the separation between investigative and intelligence agencies in a 1995 memo.

.... in order to prevent communication between the CIA and FBI over reported interactions regarding the transfer of high technology to China and their relation to campaign fundraising efforts by the Clinton Whitehouse.
32 posted on 08/10/2005 4:05:27 PM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Of course this latest Clintonista gaffe will be the lead story tomorrow morning on all the Networks. Im sure accusations of Clintonista malfeasence will be all over the NYT in the morning, too. Coupled with a collective wail of betrayal from the Left..


33 posted on 08/10/2005 4:06:35 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002
Related threads:

Congressman: Defense Knew 9/11 Hijackers (R-PA, Curt Weldon)

9/11 attackers on radar in '00? - (Clinton knew??..)

Clinton Admin. Knew of 9/11 Hijackers


===

There was another extensive post in one of todays thread on this topic. It layed out the connections--DoD Lawyers, Gorelick, Sandy Bergler. I can't find that link.

Anyway, it is of little surprise that the Clinton Legacy continues. Many of us on FR have figured as much and even suggested that cover-ups and interlinks were numerous.
34 posted on 08/10/2005 4:06:58 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I'm willing to bet that there is another angle to all of this that has yet to be revealed....

The Clinton administration mucked about with the Immigration and Naturalization requirements to a faretheewell. I was aware of it in relation to the 1996 and 2000 elections, they were packing in the foreign naitonals to fill up the Democrat voting sheets.

Interesting that these guys all came into the country during the 90's. Also interesting that so much info was available on their activites right after 9/11. Coincidence?

What was the woman's name who ran the Immigration office... her husband was killed on the flight that took out Ron Brown...

Pinz


35 posted on 08/10/2005 4:08:15 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

http://www.910knew.com/listenlive.html Michael savage


36 posted on 08/10/2005 4:11:10 PM PDT by philo (They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist. . . . Union General John Sedgwick last words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez

Doris Something


37 posted on 08/10/2005 4:11:28 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Weldon was just on Mark Levin's show. Said news tomorrow is 9-11 Commission is flip flopping on being briefed on Able Danger and Atta, now admitting it (apparently staffers did not want to go under oath against patriot agents). Sandy Bergler mentioned too, but just speculation. Also said info came from an "open source", i.e., NOT prohibitted by Gorelick Wall. It appears that the assumption is staffers did not report to Commission members. Methinks not to all but to some and Ben Veniste and Gorelick nixed it. This one may have some legs and reveal the truth. Weldon sounds like he is just getting started. Here's hoping hearings follow...


38 posted on 08/10/2005 4:11:31 PM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
She had to protect herself, too. She was the author of that abomination of a memo.

There is suggestive data that she was instrumental in the memo to the FBI officials in OKC shortly after the Murrah bombing instructing the FBI to drop the investigation of potential foreign involvement in Murrah. Jayne Davis has written extensively on this topic.

Dots all over the map. And if they ever get connected, it would send several presidencies -- both Democrat and Republican -- into history's toilet.
39 posted on 08/10/2005 4:12:34 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy; pinz-n-needlez

Good points, and I hadn't thought yet about the OKC connections. Read Pinz's post #35 too--yet more dots to connect.


40 posted on 08/10/2005 4:16:18 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Ben Veniste and Gorelick nixed it

Ben Veniste and Gorelick were NOT on that 9-11 Committee just because they didn't have anything else to do during those months. No. Ben Veniste and Gorelick were put on the commission by Clinton to make sure the fingers didn't point to him. Just like Sandy Bergler went to the National Archives to retrieve and destroy specific, incriminating documents.

And the Bush admin is being derelict in doing nothing about these criminal, and possibly treasonous, actions.
41 posted on 08/10/2005 4:18:18 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Burf

One time I heard a story from Savage that they were going to stop Atta or other 911 terrorists (I think at an airport) perhaps here in Maine but the security officer was warned by another not to stop him or they would hear from the ACLU. Did you hear that story on Savage?
You have a link to that story?

http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html


42 posted on 08/10/2005 4:20:14 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"And the Bush admin is being derelict in doing nothing about these criminal, and possibly treasonous, actions."

I'm with you. However, there may be some strategery at play here. What I can't figure is why the NY Slimes broke the story. In any event, sure makes the 9-11 Commission look like idiots or, in the case of the two you mentioned, cover up hacks (or worse)...

43 posted on 08/10/2005 4:24:12 PM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
Good evening.
"Washington civilians have proved that few of them care. What if we took over."

That's just what every constitutional republic needs, a military/police take over.

Isn't that what those brilliant guys that set this country up came up the 2nd Amendment for, just in case the Generals and their puppet politicians decided they could do a better job.

Michael Frazier
44 posted on 08/10/2005 4:24:45 PM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Ben Veniste and Gorelick were put on the commission by Clinton to make sure the fingers didn't point to him.

Can you refresh my memory on this? Why was Clinton able to put people on the 9-11 commission?

And I agree that there's something very odd about Bush in that he first protects Sandy Burglar after Burglar stole those documents from the National Archives, then doesn't pursue these activities.

45 posted on 08/10/2005 4:25:46 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
I'm with you. However, there may be some strategery at play here

Maybe you can help me with this.

What would that strategy be, and for what purpose?

46 posted on 08/10/2005 4:27:16 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002
It is not as if we all did not already know that BS such as this has been going on in our government forever.
47 posted on 08/10/2005 4:28:03 PM PDT by Radix (I was looking for a Tag Line when I found this one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Kern Radio streaming. Sorry it took so long to get back


48 posted on 08/10/2005 4:28:20 PM PDT by Burf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

Try this
www.gsnmagazine.com


49 posted on 08/10/2005 4:31:54 PM PDT by Burf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro
"What would that strategy be, and for what purpose?"

Upon reflection, poor choice of words as I doubt the WH has anything to do with this. Weldon made it sound like there were some patriots that wanted the truth out and he's doing so. Thanks....

50 posted on 08/10/2005 4:34:16 PM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson