Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did DoD lawyers blow the chance to nab Atta?
Government Security News ^ | 8/9/05 | Jacob Goodwin

Posted on 08/10/2005 4:56:36 PM PDT by philo

Did DoD lawyers blow the chance to nab Atta?

In September 2000, one year before the Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11, a U.S. Army military intelligence program, known as “Able Danger,” identified a terrorist cell based in Brooklyn, NY, one of whose members was 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta, and recommended to their military superiors that the FBI be called in to “take out that cell,” according to Rep. Curt Weldon, a longtime Republican congressman from Pennsylvania who is currently vice chairman of both the House Homeland Security and House Armed Services Committees.

The recommendation to bring down that New York City cell -- in which two other Al Qaeda terrorists were also active -- was not pursued during the weeks leading up to the 2000 presidential election, said Weldon. That’s because Mohammed Atta possessed a “green card” at the time and Defense Department lawyers did not want to recommend that the FBI go after someone holding a green card, Weldon told his House colleagues last June 27 during a little-noticed speech, known as a “special order,” which he delivered on the House floor.

Details of the origins and efforts of Able Danger were corroborated in a telephone interview by GSN with a former defense intelligence officer who said he worked closely with that program. That intelligence officer, who spoke to GSN while sitting in Rep. Weldon’s Capitol Hill office, requested anonymity for fear that his current efforts to help re-start a similar intelligence-gathering operation might be hampered if his identity becomes known.

The intelligence officer recalled carrying documents to the offices of Able Danger, which was being run by the Special Operations Command, headquartered in Tampa, FL. The documents included a photo of Mohammed Atta supplied by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service and described Atta’s relationship with Osama bin Laden. The officer was very disappointed when lawyers working for Special Ops decided that anyone holding a green card had to be granted essentially the same legal protections as any U.S. citizen. Thus, the information Able Danger had amassed about the only terrorist cell they had located inside the United States could not be shared with the FBI, the lawyers concluded.

“We were directed to take those 3M yellow stickers and place them over the faces of Atta and the other terrorists and pretend they didn’t exist,” the intelligence officer told GSN.

DoD lawyers may also have been reluctant to suggest a bold action by FBI agents after the bureau’s disastrous 1993 strike against the Branch Davidian religious cult in Waco, TX, said Weldon and the intelligence officer.

“So now, Mr. Speaker,” Weldon said on the House floor last June, “for the first time I can tell our colleagues that one of our agencies not only identified the New York cell of Mohammed Atta and two of the terrorists, but actually made a recommendation to bring the FBI in to take out that cell.”

Weldon has developed a reputation for making bold pronouncements and, occasionally, ruffling the feathers of some of his colleagues. His recent non-fiction book, “Countdown to Terror,” which draws on information from an Iranian expatriate source Weldon has dubbed “Ali,” has drawn criticism from the CIA, others in the intelligence community and some congressional colleagues.

A longtime champion of firefighters and first responders, Weldon has a particular interest in this subject because he has been openly and actively pushing since 1999 for the establishment of an integrated government-wide center that could consolidate, analyze and act upon intelligence gathered by dozens of U.S. agencies, armed services and departments.

Weldon’s proposal was based on the innovative intelligence gathering capabilities he had witnessed at the U.S. Army’s Information Dominance Center, based at Fort Belvoir, VA, (which was formerly known as the Land Information Warfare Assessment Center.) This Army center had employed data mining, profiling and data collaboration techniques before several other intelligence agencies, and was using such cutting edge software tools as Starlight (developed by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) and Spires.

For years, the CIA resisted the congressman’s recommendation, Weldon told GSN in a telephone interview on August 1, claiming that his plan to integrate dozens of discrete and classified intelligence streams was both unworkable and unnecessary. Weldon had dubbed his proposed organization the National Operations and Analysis Hub, nicknamed NOAH, because the center was intended “to protect our nation from the flood of threats,” he explained.

Sixteen months after 9/11, such a “data fusion center,” named the Terrorism Threat Integration Center (TTIC) was indeed established by the Bush Administration.

At the urging of the 9/11 Commission, the TTIC has since been restructured and renamed the National Counter Terrorism Center (NCTC).

Weldon is pleased that steps have been taken to unify the nation’s intelligence gathering and analysis capabilities, now headed by a newly established Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Negroponte, but Weldon remains concerned that the “stovepipe” mentalities that plagued the intelligence community in the past continue to inhibit true information sharing between intelligence agencies.

He is also extremely frustrated by the fact that so little official attention seems to have been paid to the intelligence failure related to the Mohammed Atta cell in Brooklyn. Weldon contends that few in the Bush Administration seem interested in investigating that missed opportunity.

“If we had had that [military intelligence] system in 1999 and 2000, which the military had already developed as a prototype, and if we had followed the lead of the military entity that identified the Al Qaeda cell of Mohammed Atta, then perhaps, Mr. Speaker, 9/11 would never have occurred,” Weldon said during his special order remarks.

According to Weldon, staff members of the 9/11 Commission were briefed on the capabilities of the Able Danger intelligence unit within the Special Operations Command, which had been set up by General Pete Schoomaker, who headed Special Ops at the time, on the orders of General Hugh Shelton, then the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. Staffers at the 9/11 Commission staffers were also told about the specific recommendation to break up the Mohammed Atta cell. However, those commission staff members apparently did not choose to brief the commission’s members on these sensitive matters.

Weldon said he was told specifically by commission members, Tim Roemer, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana; and John Lehman, a former secretary of the Navy; that they had never been briefed on the Able Danger unit within Special Ops or on the unit’s evidence of a terrorist cell in Brooklyn.

“I personally talked with [Philip] Zelikow [executive director of the 9/11 Commission] about this,” recalled the intelligence officer. “For whatever bizarre reasons, he didn’t pass on the information.”

The State Department, where Zelikow now works as a counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, said he was traveling and unavailable for comment.

“Why did the 9/11 Commission not investigate this entire situation?” asked Weldon on June 27. “Why did the 9/11 Commission not ask the question about the military’s recommendation against the Mohammed Atta cell?”

Weldon is also disappointed with himself for not pushing harder against the intelligence bureaucracy that he saw as resisting his proposal to set up a more integrated intelligence-gathering operation. But he saves some of his greatest ire for the lawyers within the Department of Defense -- he is not sure if they were working within the Special Operations Command or higher up the organizational chart, within the Office of the Secretary of Defense -- for their unwillingness to allow Able Danger to send to the FBI its evidence and its recommendation for immediate action.

“Obviously, if we had taken out that cell, 9/11 would not have occurred and, certainly, taking out those three principal players in that cell would have severely crippled, if not totally stopped, the operation that killed 3,000 people in America,” said Weldon.

Shining a spotlight on this intelligence gaffe has not been easy. Russ Caso, Weldon’s chief of staff, explained to GSN the steps his boss has taken to shed light on the situation.

Weldon spoke with Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI), the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, about conversations he has had with several members of the Able Danger intelligence unit. Weldon has urged Hoekstra to investigate the reasons why Able Danger’s revelations were not shared with the FBI. Hoekstra looked into the matter at the Pentagon, but after several days of fruitless inquiries, was unable to find anyone at the Defense Department who seemed to know anything about Able Danger or would acknowledge the intelligence unit had ever existed, explained Caso in a telephone interview with GSN.

Unwilling to let the matter drop, Weldon arranged for a face-to-face meeting in late July between Hoekstra, himself and the former intelligence officer who had worked with Able Danger, and who outlined his former unit’s evidence and recommendations for Hoekstra.

“Congressman Weldon has met with several people who were working on Able Danger to identify where Al Qaeda was set up around the world,” said Caso. “They made the suggestion that this information be passed to the FBI, and lawyers within the Defense Department -- whether within Special Ops or within OSD, we don’t know -- and the lawyers said, ‘No’.”

A report about some of these events appeared last June 19 in The Times Herald newspaper, of Norristown, PA, which is located in the Philadelphia suburbs that Rep. Weldon represents in Congress.


TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; abledanger; atta; clintonfailures; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; gorelick; gorelickmemo; hillaryknew; jamiegorelick; sandyberger; sept11; weldon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: philo
lawyers working for Special Ops decided that anyone holding a green card had to be granted essentially the same legal protections as any U.S. citizen.

Atta did not have a green card and green card holders don not have the same legal protections as U.S. Citizens. The lawyers for Special Ops should be disbarred!

41 posted on 08/10/2005 6:55:05 PM PDT by Marine Inspector (Customs & Border Protection Officer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

FR has such an impact on these type of events. Without a groundswell on FR demanding an investigation, it will be swept under the rug with minimal consequence.


42 posted on 08/10/2005 6:58:36 PM PDT by Stew Padasso ("That boy is nuttier than a squirrel turd.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: midogwood

As I said on the other thread, May visions of collapsing towers and falling bodies dance in their heads for eternity. At least now that the truth is out these scum can no longer hide behind their rationalizations. "I was only doing my job. I was following the law."

No you caused 3000 Americans to be murdered.


43 posted on 08/10/2005 7:00:13 PM PDT by mercy (never again a patsy for Bill Gates - spyware and viri free for over a year now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector

"The lawyers for Special Ops should be disbarred!"

They should be jailed, and if we find out that Berglar was swiping documents surrounding Atta, he should get the death penalty.


44 posted on 08/10/2005 7:00:16 PM PDT by Stew Padasso ("That boy is nuttier than a squirrel turd.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: R W Reactionairy

Still even if they had green cards, if they were found to be in the states by LYING on their application: would you not want them to be questioned?


45 posted on 08/10/2005 7:06:26 PM PDT by thebaron512
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: philo

In September 2000, one year before the Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11, a U.S. Army military intelligence program, known as “Able Danger,” identified a terrorist cell based in Brooklyn, NY, one of whose members was 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta, and recommended to their military superiors that the FBI be called in to “take out that cell,” according to Rep. Curt Weldon, a longtime Republican congressman from Pennsylvania who is currently vice chairman of both the House Homeland Security and House Armed Services Committees.


The recommendation to bring down that New York City cell -- in which two other Al Qaeda terrorists were also active -- was not pursued during the weeks leading up to the 2000 presidential election, said Weldon. That’s because Mohammed Atta possessed a “green card” at the time and Defense Department lawyers did not want to recommend that the FBI go after someone holding a green card, Weldon told his House colleagues last June 27 during a little-noticed speech, known as a “special order,” which he delivered on the House floor.



Who were the folks in the White House then?

THE DUMBORATS.

Funny that this didn't hightlight the 911 commission. I guess this guy didn't have a book coming out.


46 posted on 08/10/2005 7:11:49 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

This guy Weldon, he seems to always be around important national securtiy issues. Whats his chances for moving up to the White House. Has he served in the military? ProLife?


47 posted on 08/10/2005 7:13:29 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: philo

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1460271/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1460536/posts


48 posted on 08/10/2005 7:13:43 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stew Padasso
I don't think this will be swept under the rug. It's too important. Besides we already have our counterparts of the New Media on the job. Rush and Savage have already chimed in and hopefully it won't be a one day story. Heads need to roll and they need to start with Jamie Gorelick and her wall. What PC/BS I swear!!
49 posted on 08/10/2005 7:18:06 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Stew Padasso

"Without a groundswell on FR demanding an investigation, it will be swept under the rug with minimal consequence".

Weldon stated on FoxNews (this AM), that there are several investigations ON-GOING within the House Of Representatives. Delay is ALL over this. Sit back and watch the masters land this big-one!

LLS


50 posted on 08/10/2005 7:23:08 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

My hit parade of this thread so far

If David Koresh only had a green card, that regrettable incident need never have happened.

Did DoD Lawyers Miss a Chance to Nail Atta?"

No. Clintons' justice dept. would not allow it. They were too busy shipping innocent children to island prisons and just outright burning others to death to worry about terrorists.

The rank and fetid aroma of the clintons once again wafts up from the bowels of death and destruction. This air is their legacy, but unfortunately, we are the ones left to inhale it.
"Prior to joining Fannie Mae in May 1997, Gorelick was deputy attorney general of the United States, a position she assumed in March 1994. From May 1993 until she joined the Justice Department, Gorelick served as general counsel of the Department of Defense..."

And of course, that the democrats where in the White House while this happened.



51 posted on 08/10/2005 7:31:06 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
I just bookmarked this one and the other one. We need to keep up the heat on this for sure.
I will be sure and bring it up Sunday. Hope others do as well.
52 posted on 08/10/2005 7:31:15 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cwb

Oh, yeah...right from her biography:

"Prior to joining Fannie Mae in May 1997, Gorelick was deputy attorney general of the United States, a position she assumed in March 1994. From May 1993 until she joined the Justice Department, Gorelick served as general counsel of the Department of Defense..."

It would appear that before she got busy building her "wall" with the DOJ, she was attempting to do something similar at DoD. The Clinton's fascination with treating terrorism as a "legal matter" came right out of all this manuevering.

This was an attempt to give lawyers the final say, even when it came to military decisions. And this was further exposed when you look at those operations that were nixed because lawyers got involved. Whether it was the cancelled operation to kill UBL when a drone spotted him, or the refusal to extradite him from Sudan--supposedly because they couldn't get an indictment--these decisions were all made by lawyers.

Even this latest story was a result of Reno/Gorelick policy that refused to even LOOK at Arabs for fear of being accused of racism or profiling. And all of this was also an extension of Clinton's Mid-East Peace legacy were he didn't want to appear biased against Arabs as he dealt with Isreal and Palestine. Yet, even with all this appeasement throughout the 1990's, we were still attacked on 9/11.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
If I remember properly, wasn't Karl Rove lambasted for saying that democrats would see terrorist acts as criminal acts, but Republicans see it as an act of war?? Something to that effect. Anybody got the article?


53 posted on 08/10/2005 7:33:29 PM PDT by Ethyl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

Relax. The next few days will determine if this has legs or not. I hope it has legs, not so much to apportion blame, but to change the policy for the future.

Stay cool.

Oh, NO, we need the BLAME to come out, klintoon is responsible for multiple treasonous acts, and he needs to go to jail for it. Blame him for 911, we've got the evidence now, blame him for giving the chineee the information to hit all of America with nukes, just so he got their illegal campaine contributions....etc...etc...etc!


54 posted on 08/10/2005 7:38:00 PM PDT by Ethyl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ethyl
"Gorelick wall" "an attempt to give lawyers final say over military matters". Brilliant post!!Good going.
55 posted on 08/10/2005 7:38:51 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

I can't believe there are not a dozen threads on this on fr right now. This is the whole ball game. The rats have been caught with their PC, BS mentality causing 911. It does not get any more culpable than that. Someone needs to hang.

Let me name a few..........bill klintoon, hilary, algore, gorelick, half-bright, reno, cohen,kennedy, kerry,cuomo and all the rest of the idiots in the demoncraptic party for causing and enabeling 9-11, and the war on terror that the Republicans have had to wage, with no help from the peanut gallery of fools....demoncrapts.....oh I forgot howey dean,,,,,,,,,,,,,,hang em HIGH!!!!


56 posted on 08/10/2005 7:49:44 PM PDT by Ethyl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: philo
Here's hoping the the Bush Administration will go full stream ahead with this information. Using it to clean house at the DOD and the CIA. But most of all to finally investigate the crimes of the clintoons.
Bush doesn't have to be the good guy any longer. Let him take on the criminals in the previous administration.
57 posted on 08/10/2005 7:54:05 PM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Chad

I assume Savage forgot to take his lithium this morning.

(The days he has any pep at all, he has scads of it. The other days, he's so low, he can't see over the steering wheel.)


58 posted on 08/10/2005 7:57:25 PM PDT by Xenalyte (Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: thebaron512
"Still even if they had green cards, if they were found to be in the states by LYING on their application: would you not want them to be questioned?"

"Yes!" -- no argument with me on that question but it is too late -- we cannot turn back the clock.

Accordingly, since the 911 attack cannot be undone and the 911 nut jobs committed suicide as part of their cowardly murders ... and we are clearly looking for the master nut job Osama ... we might as well see what can be done about the horrendously slimy and IMO culpable Ms. Gorelick.

59 posted on 08/10/2005 8:00:35 PM PDT by R W Reactionairy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

I caught a few minutes of Weldon on Fox and Friends this a.m., I am pretty sure he said one of the reasons this wasn't pursued was that the Justice Dept didn't want to risk politics and popularity with this because of Waco.

The JD used to same excuse to not nab the cult leader in our county who molested 140+ children. Amazingly, shortly after Bush took office, he was arrested and his compound was recently sold to be converted back to farmland.

Gotta have a legacy, ya know.

Risking popularity to stop the murder of American citizens? Sounds more like Bush's MO. Definatly not Clinton's.

BTW - Where's Jamie? (Gorlick) Where's Richie Clark? And *what* was Burglar stuffing in his pants?


60 posted on 08/10/2005 8:09:40 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Refill with only real Kikkoman Soy Sauce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson