Posted on 08/11/2005 1:48:54 AM PDT by rdb3

It's sad when anyone dies of cancer, but we cant' let the human side of the Peter Jennings story obscure his real "achievements."
While the rest of the world is blindly singing Jennings' praises, here's a reality check: Peter Jennings did more for the cause of Islamic terrorism than any media figure today. And that's nothing to celebrate, honor, or even memorialize.
It is no coincidence that al-Jazeera's chief Washington correspondent praised ABC -- and Jennings, in particular -- for their "objectivity." Before there was al-Jazeera, there was Peter Jennings.
From the beginning of Jennings' career until his death, his biased coverage went beyond the pale, bending over backward in "understanding" the terrorists who hate us -- from seeing "their side" when he covered the seige and then murder of innocent Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics to honoring an al-Qaeda operative with a prized "commentator" spot during Jennings coverage of the 9/11 attacks.
Throughout Jennings' coverage of the attacks, he frequently featured a man named Tariq Hamdi (whose commentary urged understanding for the radical Muslim world), identifying Hamdi only as "journalist" on the chyron.
But, in fact, Jennings' friend Hamdi was no journalist at all. As I've written, Hamdi was an accused Bin Laden associate and employed by Sami al-Arian, the head of Palestinian Islamic Jihad in the United States.
According to prosecutors and documents in the 1998 trial of the Osama bin Laden bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa (the 7th anniversary of which was yesterday), Hamdi provided Bin Laden a satellite battery instrumental in those bombings. He's also an unindicted co-conspirator with Islamic Jihad financial head Sami al-Arian, who employed him at his Islamic "charity" fronts at the University of South Florida. Hamdi was also an employee of a Saudi-funded charity raided by Customs agents for allegedly laundering billions to al-Qaeda through the Isle of Man.
Jennings mentioned absolutely nothing about Hamdi's disturbing activities, but did note that Hamdi was his friend and repeatedly featured Hamdi in post-9/11 ABC News broadcasts. This is the type of "journalist" and "commentator" Jennings frequently employed in his so-called newscast of which he was an all-controlling editor.
Now the Washington Post repeats what I've said about Hamdi, but adds more. Days ago, Hamdi was indicted for immigration and mortgage-loan fraud. While failing to mention Jennings, the Post also adds, "ABC did not respond to a request for more information about its relationship with Hamdi." The recently unsealed indictment also mentions that Hamdi was the U.S. representative for the Committee for the Defense of Legitimate Rights in Saudi Arabia, "a London-based organization that has embraced many of bin Laden's views," according to the Post.
That's a "journalist" in what was "The World According to Peter Jennings."
(Hamdi has now fled the U.S. Don't count on him coming back to face justice. Question for ICE press flack, Dean Boyd: Why was Tariq Hamdi allowed to leave the U.S.?)
I always say, pillow talk is the most effective form of political speech. And it apparently had its effect on Jennings early on. When developing and heading up ABC's Beirut headquarters, Jennings "dated" Palestinian Hanan Ashrawi. And it colored his insidious, anti-American, anti-Israel coverage ever since.
Then there were the sneers, the sneers of a Canadian high school drop-out for anything conservative, anything mainstream, anything pro-Western, pro-America, pro-Israel, etc. Jennings' sneers and snide comments were always evident for those who did not meet his very left-of-center point of view. A great example was his sneering during the 2000 vote recount, and after, when Bush was declared President. Another was his sneering just after the 9/11 attacks when Bush delivered his speech to a joint session of Congress. Then there was his sneering reaction and say-it-ain't-so comments when conservative revolutionaries led Republicans to capture the House of Representatives in 1994. And who can forget Jennings' sneering ABC News Special in which he decried America's bombing of Heroshima and Nagasaki, which saved American lives.
Jennings' elitist sneers will NOT be missed.
During ABC's Gulf War coverage, when ABC military expert Tony Cordesman attributed much of the success of our military forces to Israeli improvements to our weapons systems and as command and control advised by the Israelis, Jennings became enraged and argued with him.
While Jenning's death is a human tragedy, it is sad that his despicable brand of advocacy journalism -- parading as "news" -- wasn't laid to rest along with him.
Unfortunately, that will not happen. His version has spawned a thousand clones. Sadly, the female, more personable, non-toupeed version of Jennings -- Elizabeth Vargas -- is set to step into Jennings' shoes. She got off to a great Jennings-esque start in her first hosting duties at ABC's "20/20," last fall. She delivered a very sympathetic profile and interview of Hamas operative and fundraiser Cat Stevens. Expect more of this to come.
It's sad when anyone dies of cancer. I won't dance on Jennings' grave, even though he managed to justify the early graves of young, innocent athletes slaughtered at the Munich Olympics -- the way he blasphemed their murders with his shallow, understand-the-Islamic-terrorists coverage. Unlike the murdered Munich athletes he dishonored, Jennings died in peace and without pain. He got to say good-bye to his loved ones. They did not.
I will remember Peter Jennings for the less than honorable person he was -- not the emperor with no clothing that is now being memorialized.
Jennings used to end his newscasts with, "And that's a look at our world." No, it wasn't a look at our world, at all. It was Peter Jennings' slanted world, and every day he acted as if he was doing us a favor giving us his warped look at it.
Jennings' legacy is helping advance the cause of Islamic terrorists on broadcast television, parading it as news. He wrote his own epitaph with it. Unfortunately, it came with a lot more tombstones and epitaphs than just Jennings' -- and most of those buried beneath are a whole lot more innocent.
They are the victims of Islamic terrorism -- the brand Peter Jennings helped build into a network news product. That cancer, unfortunately, is still here. And it has metasticized.
(Read more on the REAL Peter Jennings.)
bttt
Tisk tisk. This babe isn't afraid to tell it like it is. I personally prefer to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, at least until they're underground.
He doesn't have the USA to kick around anymore, for damn sure.
I tend to agree.
Sadly, the female... non-toupeed version of Jennings...
This is Schlussel's problem--she can't ever seem to make a point w/o resorting to irrelevant gutter-sniping. She has all the nuance of a James Carville and worse timing. Diminishes her voice & makes her less effective, IMO.
I hated him and felt relief when he died. Just telling the truth. Now if about 500 others of his ilk would just follow his and Robin Cook's example, we just might win the WOT and set America back on course.
I'm kinda with you on that one. Write it if you must, but wait until after the funeral to publish it. Just kind of basic human decency.
She didn't wait for the body to go cold before she wrote her screed. Cold, cold, woman. And David Horowitz, who I'm glad is on our side, made a mistake publishing this so quickly.
Great post. Still, I'll wait another week before I "honor" Peter Jennings, myself...
What's with all this reverential tiptoeing around after the death of a known terrorist sympathizer and America-hater? I say good riddance.
More information here:
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1733
Well, we are at war so some would disagree, esp.(you'd think), Cindy Sheehan!.
"Let Us Roll"
But also remember that assholes provide a very essential function = minimize the number of people with brown eyes!
Why wait? She nailed her description of Jennings. :)
Nonsense. It all depends on the person.
I used to have a redneck, son-of-a-bitch brother-in-law who would go to the local bowling alley and raise hell on a regular basis, picking fights which he would invariably lose. One of my wife's co-workers used to moonlight at the same bowling alley, and knew my brother-in-law quite well. One day my brother-in-law was bowling on the third lane, and had just rolled a nasty split. Just as he was going for his second ball, he turned a wonderful shade of blue, collapsed, and died right then and there. Later, my wife's friend told her, "I'm really sorry; I know he was your sister's husband, but I've never been so glad to see anyone die." Those were not his sentiments alone, I can assure you.

I am trying to read this article, but something keeps distracting me.
ping
The bit about the toupe was "under the belt", but I won't pretend he was good just because he's dead.
Thanks for the dose of reality.
bump
"I personally prefer to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, at least until they're underground."
Then you must have missed out on all the celebration when Uday and Qusay died.
And no one brings up the fact that he lived for a time with that Hanna woman who is now a muckety-muck in the Palistian government. No, Jennings was never unbiased when it came to his support of the Palistians.
So it would be a good guess that you don't appreciate Ann Coulter.
Needed to be said. Dead-on.
Peter Jennings was way too friendly towards Islam. He went native when he was a foreign correspondent in the Middle East. Another brain captured by it's romanticization of Arab culture. Happens to the English all the time.
I agree with you fundamentally, but I figured out before I was out of elementary school that reporters/journalists on the whole are one of the world's lowest life forms, almost completely void of human decency. It's just that every now and then, the message that's tastelessly delivered over a warm carcass is so pointedly accurate that it cannot help but evoke hearty assent.
Good grief. No doubt satan and George III had less than glowing opinions of God, Christ, and our founding fathers. And besides Jaysun didn't say everyone in the world is an asshole. He said "opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one and everybody thinks everyone else's stinks". It's a figure of speech. And if you need to ask- it can be said with great certainty that the founding fathers and our Lord and Savior all had one. As for God, well, we all find out in the end (pun intended). Lighten up.
Crapola, jennings was an anti American socilaist.
I don't give a damn if he moved to the U.S. it was for purely financial dealings.
He died of his own doings, he smoked and a lot.
I usually was inscensed when I ever had the misfortune to tune in to his "news program", that was usually little more then propaganda for the islamists or any other group fighting the U.S.
Watch any interview of a liberal like the murderer Kennedy and watch his demeanor then watch his scowl when forced to interview any conservative.
He died. I feel bed for those he left behind and their grief but the put him of some pedestal and say great things about him is just lunacy.
I was in Iran in 1978 when Jimmy Carter and his huge entourage of 900 reporters visited Tehran on New Year's eve. Barbara Walters was on the trip. She was accorded rock star status including being one of a few reporters to be invited to the Shah's relatively intimate dinner honoring Carter. She was invited because she was a celebrity, not a reporter.
The idea that a "news reader" like Jennings could leave any real legacy is nonsense. Like the rest of the news media, he was a legend in his own mind.
Just the fact that his friend was Alan Alda was enough to know he was a commie lib~rat scuzzball.
I remember Peter Jennings slandering President Reagan (I don't recall the particulars, but I do remember it was an inference that Reagan was a"racist") while the video feed showed Reagan's casket being carried either in or out of the church.
Peter Jennings is known for his class, although he had none.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.