Posted on 08/11/2005 5:05:36 PM PDT by Crackingham
CALDWELL, IDAHO - This oasis of irrigated farm country in the high desert is a long way from the US-Mexico border, and even farther from the nation's capital, but it represents America's new battleground on immigration policy. Here county commissioner Robert Vasquez is trying to do what he says Washington won't: crack down on illegal immigration. He recently sued several local employers in a novel bid to use federal anticorruption law to prevent hiring illegals.
Mr. Vasquez's controversial crusade is part of a larger pattern. As the border continues to be punctured by illicit crossings, and as immigrants spread to places unaccustomed to or unprepared for the influx, a local backlash is building.
The moves, ranging from police arrests in New Hampshire to community activism in Tennessee, point to a sharp political divide. At the very least, they signal a rift among conservatives among conservatives that may be growing more pronounced, as President Bush seeks an accommodative policy but faces resistance from some other Republicans such as Vasquez. But the attempted crackdowns also reveal a larger rift - one that separates much of Main Street America from the nation's policymaking elite. At a time when Congress is considering guest-worker programs to legalize more undocumented workers, polls show most Americans want to see illegal immigration curbed.
Local lawsuits and policies will hardly achieve that goal by themselves, but if successful they could create pressure for stronger federal action.
"The public agrees on certain things, and one of these is the distinction between legal and illegal immigration," says Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies. But "in the end it's mostly within Washington's purview."
Indeed, Vasquez is seeking to take his fight to the nation's capital. He hopes to win a seat in Congress in 2006 and push for stricter immigration policies alongside Rep. Tom Tancredo (R) of Colorado.
But first he faces a hearts-and-minds battle here in Canyon County as he presses his lawsuits along with two fellow commissioners.
Caldwell, the community where Vasquez's office sits in the county courthouse, is oriented around a railroad track and the Farm City Agribusiness Park. Where some streets sport freshly painted bungalows and lush lawns, others are defined by trailer homes that have seen better decades. What binds the 26,000 residents together, however, is a tradition of hard work in the nearby fields, shops, and food-processing plants.
Vasquez, whose grandfather came from Mexico, complains of an "unarmed invasion" that is fast transforming American towns like this one. "Why," he asks, "should I have to 'Press 1 for English?' "
But if cultural change is a key backdrop of the debate, both sides frame their views largely around economic arguments.
On that score, many here support the effort to clamp down on illegal laborers.
"They say these are jobs that no one else will take," says Tim Smallwood, an Idaho fruit and vegetable inspector, as he takes a lunch break in Caldwell. But if employers were denied that pool of cheap labor, overall wages would go up he says.
Lori Morrison, who manages a night shift at Jack-in-the-Box to help support her family, shares the worry about wages. And she adds another concern: the social-service burden on government. "Taxes have gone up," she says. "They're killing us."
But others see the dollars and cents differently. They say immigrants have traditionally filled the lowest rung, those often unwanted jobs, as they climb toward better lives.
"We understand that there's a problem with illegal immigration," says Keith Esplin, executive director of Potato Growers of Idaho. But he says there's a shortage of workers willing to do strenuous jobs in agriculture, construction, and landscaping.
He calls for expanded guest-worker program, a move supported by Sen. Larry Craig (R) of Idaho among others. And Mr. Esplin says it's unfair to place the onus on employers as gatekeepers: "An employer has no way of knowing when he gets a document from a worker whether it's false or real."
In the long run, some say the Real ID Act, passed by Congress this spring to ensure authenticity of driver's licenses, could help employers hire only legal residents.
In the short run, the fact is that relatively few employers are prosecuted for hiring illegal workers.
To some experts, current policies are simply out of step with labor-market reality.
"There is no legal channel for [millions of undocumented workers] to be here, yet they need to be here," says Christina DeConcini, director of policy at the National Immigration Forum in Washington. "We need their labor to do these jobs."
Really? Well gee...if I went to Mexico and chanted about how great my homeland was, started racist groups like MEChA and La Raza that terrorized entire regions, started insisting that the government give me free handouts, and demanded that people start learning my language rather than learning their native tongue that I wouldn't just get "backlash," I get lynched.
"Why, should I have to 'Press 1 for English?' "
Sounds like a bumper sticker if I ever saw one.
And what jobs might those be, Cristina?
You mean like this one:
Lori Morrison, who manages a night shift at Jack-in-the-Box to help support her family, shares the worry about wages. And she adds another concern: the social-service burden on government. "Taxes have gone up," she says. "They're killing us."
Isn't this one of the jobs "Americans just won't do", Christina?
bttt
because the US has no official language and a huge minority speaks spanish. Sucks, but makes sense.
Biggest political news here is that our county commissioners (3) voted unanimously to sue 4 of the biggest companies in our county for federal fraud & racketeering charges based on the belief that they knew they were hiring illegal immigrants and did so anyway. Could be very interesting.
Not really. It depends. It’s like food prep or stocking – the job simply isn’t worth more than the bare minimum. At a point they just use pre-packaged/pre-prepped or vendor unloaded/stocked/priced/inventoried and dump their own employees altogether. Or, they fold it into some other function and get rid of the lesser one. Same difference, really.
I’ve tried to point that sort of thing out before but there are too many amateur businessmen analyzing things. They know best. I’ll let them handle it. (And gladly!)
At some point they’ll learn that capital is fluid. When it gets to be too big a PITA to operate “A,” the money will mysteriously flow to “B.” If “B” happens to be in country “C,” so be it. They’ll complain, but being amateur “virtual businessmen” with no money on the table they won’t lose much.
I live 10 minutes from the Pentagon. I wouldn't dare put one on my car if I wanted to have it remain whole. Going to a grocery store one hears everything but unbroken english.
Then shouldn't it say, "press 1 for Spanish, or hold for
an operator."
broke--> break...
Bull
Actually it depends on the company some have press 1 for english in english or hold and then press 2 for spanish said in spanish. It really depends on the system they are using. Presonally, I dont really care. Spanish speakers have been in the US as long as English speakers english is just the defacto standard (it helps that it is also the international language)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.