Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TonyInOhio
At Power Line a while back was this concerning what was really to be covered up (Note: The 9/11 Commission focused on the period from 1998 on IIRC):

We shouldn't overstate Ms. Gorelick's culpability in the Sept. 11 attacks. I think that her raising of the bar on communications between intelligence and law enforcement officials was probably a minor contributor; I suspect that her apparent involvement in the incorrect decision that it was illegal to use special ops troops to go after al Qaeda's leadership, when she was the head attorney for the Department of Defense, was far more significant.

257 posted on 08/11/2005 7:23:33 PM PDT by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aposiopetic
I suspect that her (Gorelick) apparent involvement in the incorrect decision that it was illegal to use special ops troops to go after al Qaeda's leadership, when she was the head attorney for the Department of Defense, was far more significant.

Holy shiite.

259 posted on 08/11/2005 7:24:48 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (The constitution is not in exile, it's in a nice safe deposit box in the Cayman Islands - Lileks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: aposiopetic

"I suspect that her apparent involvement in the incorrect decision that it was illegal to use special ops troops to go after al Qaeda's leadership, when she was the head attorney for the Department of Defense, was far more significant."

Well, that's two strikes against her. And she was on the 9/11 Commission? And is it true that she was controlling the selection of the evidence reviewed by the Commission?


349 posted on 08/11/2005 8:10:02 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: aposiopetic

Remember it was Tenet and Clarke who called off Schoen's team taking Bin Laden at the Tarnak Farm in Afghanistan way way back in '98 IIRC, and what was the reason given? Not enough information to indict...Was this an effect of Gorelick's wall that prevented the CIA/FBI/et al. from sharing and kept them from getting the green light? Not to say that the Clintoons were protecting UBL, but to demonstrate the Law of Unintended Consequences goes further than 9/11 and into our current day. This may go back to Chinagate, but we are still paying for this today.


638 posted on 08/12/2005 1:20:43 PM PDT by Lone Red Ranger (The government that's big enough to provide everything for you is big enough to take it all away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson