Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Democratic Party merge with Communist Party?
World Net Daily ^ | August 12, 2005 | Devvy Kidd

Posted on 08/12/2005 7:26:43 AM PDT by Mikey

No doubt such a question will immediately raise the hackles of those who belong to the Democratic Party, but I believe this is a valid question considering the Communist Party USA and the Communist Party of Red China endorsed John Kerry for president in the last pretend election. They wouldn't endorse him unless they felt he would continue to further the agenda for world communism via the official Democratic Party.

As someone who doesn't waste their time playing the blame game (It's the Democrats! It's the Republicans!) – because I know that if you play the game, it plays you – I feel it's more important to look at the big picture. Additionally, as I haven't belonged to any political party since 1996, it gives me the freedom to proudly identify myself as a constitutionalist and not a pawn of some political party.

The Democratic Party touts it's the party of the working man. Their national platform endorses the toxic and destructive practice of sodomy and encourages women to commit sexual abominations with each other. Their national platform, led by a certifiable maniac named Howard Dean, endorses and encourages women to fight to "protect their reproductive rights" by killing their unborn babies.

Since the turn of the 20th century, the Democratic Party has worked diligently to rob its membership of the fruits of their labor via all the unconstitutional acts passed under FDR and in subsequent administrations. Back then, before the masters who pull the strings of the White House and Congress bought up all major newspapers in this country in order to control the flow of information, some were sounding the alarm.

Back in 1996, I wrote about the 57 members of Congress who belonged to the "Progressive Caucus." The Democratic Socialists of America highly admire these left-of-the-left members of Congress, i.e., open socialist Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., who should be barred from serving in the U.S. Congress because his goal is the destruction of our constitutional republic (we are not a democracy). Here's just a few current members of the Progressive Caucus – all Democrats except for Sanders:

Lynn Woolsey, Calif., George Miller, Calif., Nancy Pelosi, Calif., Henry Waxman, Calif., "Mad Max" Maxine Waters, Calif., Bob Filner, Calif., Diane DeGette, Colo., Alcee Hastings, Fla., John Lewis, Ga., Patsy Mink, Hawaii, Jessie Jackson Jr., Ill., Barney Frank, Mass., John Conyers, Mich., Jerrold Nadler, N.Y., Major Owens, N.Y., Charles Rangel, N.Y., Dennis Kucinch, Ohio, Sherrod Brown, Ohio, Peter DeFazio, Ore., Robert C. Scott, Va., Bernard Sanders, Vt., James McDermott, Wash.

Unless and until one understands exactly how communists go about recruiting by duping uninformed Americans, they will continue to gain ground in their quest to destroy this republic and enslave all of us under an iron fist. The goal for world communist domination and how it is being implemented is right in the face of Americans if they would just get out of denial and take a good look at their party's platform.

Make no mistake: This constitutional republic is on the verge of total annihilation. One of the most thoroughly documented books on this critical issue is "The Naked Communist" by former FBI agent W. Cleon Skousen, founder of the Center for Constitutional Studies. In his book, Skousen succinctly lays out exactly how the communists have gained such a strong foothold in America – you can read 45 of their goals listed in the Congressional Record.

If you belong to the Democratic Party, I urge you to take the time to study the platform of your party and compare them to the goals of the communists. They are one and the same, although this will bring shrieks from the likes of Marxist Hillary Clinton, it is the raw truth.

If it will make Democrats feel any better, they need only look at the Republican-controlled Congress since 1994 to see that the official agenda of the GOP – enforced through their voting record on key issues over the years – to see that they have also fallen in lockstep with virtually every communist goal. Don't think so? Look how many Republicans in Congress support and have voted for legislation that is a priority for communist domination. Do the research.

I know there are millions of decent Americans who belong to the Democratic Party who do not support their party leadership's stand on sodomy, abortion and other issues. Rather, they have supported the Democratic Party because of jobs. However, 99 percent of them have no idea how they have been lied to about Social Security, withholding and the income tax, issues I have written about for more than a decade and since November 2004 for WorldNetDaily. Sadly, like too many Republicans, party faithful only hear the sound bites and what sounds good for their little world.

I urge all Americans to study the links in this column and then get to work to clean out this Congress and elect constitutionalists who will restore America to its former greatness. Not only will we be released from all these Nazi "security" laws that have been enacted, but America will prosper for all her people.

The master plan is all but a fait accompli. People should remember these words by Ayn Rand: "We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: The stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission – which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force."

___________________________

Devvy Kidd authored the booklet, "Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty," which has sold close to 2 million copies. She has been a guest more than 1,600 times on radio shows, run for Congress twice and is a highly sought after public speaker. To learn more about Devvy, please visit her website.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: communist; cpusa; democrat; dnc; dncplatform
I've said before and I'll say it again, theres really no major difference between the Republican party and the democrat party. At one time the Republicans stood strongly for our Constitutional representative Republic, but not more. All one hears coming out of the mouths of the so-called republicans today is our democracy this, and our democracy that .

The Republicans and the Democrats have merged into the Republicratic party of Amerika.

Stop wasting your vote on the same ' ole BS year after year after year expecting different results each time. When one votes republican or democrat, all one gets is the same agenda . The only difference is whether the so-called representative has an R or a D proceeding their name.

Since the infamous FDR instituted all these socialistic programs into our country, has any republican even tried to remove them from government because of their unconstitutionality?

Stop voting for the lesser of two evils expecting different results. Remember the lesser of two evils is STILL evil.

Vote Constitution Party

1 posted on 08/12/2005 7:26:43 AM PDT by Mikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mikey
Should Democratic Party merge with Communist Party?

There's a difference?

2 posted on 08/12/2005 7:27:50 AM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus (The function of socialism is to raise suffering to a higher level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

Oh, there's a difference?


3 posted on 08/12/2005 7:28:06 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

16 seconds.


4 posted on 08/12/2005 7:28:30 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

I win! I win!


5 posted on 08/12/2005 7:29:30 AM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus (The function of socialism is to raise suffering to a higher level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
"Should Democratic Party merge with Communist Party?"

YESSS! Excellent idea, Devvy!

I'm sure they just haven't thought of it.

6 posted on 08/12/2005 7:30:24 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Love is the ultimate aphrodisiac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

Isn't that kind of like asking if I should merge with myself??


7 posted on 08/12/2005 7:30:32 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

The Democrats are not communists! Theyare simply left- liberal. That's a whole world of difference. A communist wouldclaim that the Democrats are far right


8 posted on 08/12/2005 7:30:34 AM PDT by Moderate right-winger (BEWARE of 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
No doubt such a question will immediately raise the hackles of those who belong to the Democratic Party,...

I wonder why the author believes this to be the case. Maybe a few in the party would be upset but most wouldn't know the difference.

9 posted on 08/12/2005 7:31:10 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

They already have.


10 posted on 08/12/2005 7:31:23 AM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

Oh, there's a difference?
-----
Good point. I thought the DNC and CPUSA were already strongly linked...and to top it off, throw the ACLU in there too -- all the same ilk.


11 posted on 08/12/2005 7:32:14 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

Its only a matter of time before the Donk Party changes its name. I expect it will contain "green" or "children and families"...


12 posted on 08/12/2005 7:32:59 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
Check this site out!

/satire off

13 posted on 08/12/2005 7:33:15 AM PDT by Minnesocold (Truth itself is the one enemy against which liberalism cannot prevail. -Christopher Adamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger

You are dead right.

I am on the CP-USA's mailing list, and what you say is true. Communists have little use for Democratic Capitalism.


14 posted on 08/12/2005 7:34:13 AM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

They already have.


15 posted on 08/12/2005 7:34:29 AM PDT by JFC ( President Bush, You are being prayed for along with our country daily, by millions of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger
"The Democrats are not communists! Theyare simply left- liberal. That's a whole world of difference. A communist wouldclaim that the Democrats are far right"

In the "verbiage" they espouse, yes---but in the POLICIES they seek to implement, there is no difference.

"If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck......"

16 posted on 08/12/2005 7:35:17 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
Both parties should make it official. However, the Communists are more agreeable these days, so perhaps the Commies should merge into the Dem party instead of the other way around.
17 posted on 08/12/2005 7:36:38 AM PDT by A.B.Normal (Craziness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result, ask a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76

The Democrats, even if they have a liberal wing( Deaniacs), also has a centrist pro business wing(DLC). The communist party detests both as tools of the bourgeoisie...left wing props of capitalism to coopt the real left.


18 posted on 08/12/2005 7:36:44 AM PDT by Moderate right-winger (BEWARE of 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger

Absolutely,

And as much fun as it is to call Democrats Communists, (I do it myself sometimes) there is a huge difference between Democratic Socialism (wich is what the left side of the Democratic Party practices) and Communism which advocates the elimination of private property.


19 posted on 08/12/2005 7:41:16 AM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Minnesocold

Thats pretty good.


20 posted on 08/12/2005 7:41:42 AM PDT by Mikey (Freedom isn't free, but slavery is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A.B.Normal

I doubt if the Communists want to be associated with the Dems.


21 posted on 08/12/2005 7:46:21 AM PDT by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
No difference between the Republicans and the democrats?
There is no difference between the democrats and the socialists.
22 posted on 08/12/2005 7:53:58 AM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76
And as much fun as it is to call Democrats Communists, (I do it myself sometimes) there is a huge difference between Democratic Socialism (wich is what the left side of the Democratic Party practices) and Communism which advocates the elimination of private property.

Property rights went out the window years ago. You can test this for yourself...skip a years worth of property taxes...or try taking yourself off the power grid...or remodel your home without getting the dozens of permits you "need".

23 posted on 08/12/2005 7:55:55 AM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus (The function of socialism is to raise suffering to a higher level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger
The Democrats are not communists!

Socialist, communist ... whatever.

A laser scalpel is required to separate their long term policy goals.

A communist would claim that the Democrats are far right

And their words are just as trustworthy as are those of a jihadist muslim.

Al-Taqiyah commie style.

24 posted on 08/12/2005 8:00:09 AM PDT by Freebird Forever (AMERICA FIRST !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger
"The Democrats are not communists! They are simply left- liberal. That's a whole world of difference. A communist would claim that the Democrats are far right"

Yeah, but there's are real comparison to be made between the USSR/Pravda and Democratic Party/MSM relationships.

The left-wingers in our country are about as fascist as it gets.

That's all the comparison I need.

Ultra-left Democrats are indeed communists.
25 posted on 08/12/2005 8:02:00 AM PDT by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
I've said before and I'll say it again, theres really no major difference between the Republican party and the democrat party. At one time the Republicans stood strongly for our Constitutional representative Republic, but not more. All one hears coming out of the mouths of the so-called republicans today is our democracy this, and our democracy that...

Concur...with the possible following exceptions:
* Democrans believe in larger government than Republicrats
* Republicrats believe in larger laws than Democrans
* Democrans are a lot like condoms that are purchased by budding juveniles in that they tend to spend a lot of time in a wallet.
* Republicrats tend to want to spend a lot of time in bedrooms in search of the reason the condom was purchased.

VOTE LIBERTARIAN!

26 posted on 08/12/2005 8:03:04 AM PDT by meandog (FOR LURKING DUers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

"Property rights went out the window years ago"

I know what you're saying, "absolute" property rights are gone.

But I am not going to say we are anywhere near the level of the old USSR.


27 posted on 08/12/2005 8:04:53 AM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meandog
VOTE LIBERTARIAN!

Yeah theres a winning ticket

28 posted on 08/12/2005 8:05:38 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76
But I am not going to say we are anywhere near the level of the old USSR.

Another good reason to keep Hillary out of the presidency.

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" - Hillary Clinton

29 posted on 08/12/2005 8:07:56 AM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus (The function of socialism is to raise suffering to a higher level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

Why not they already merged with the Republican party. Both love to increase spending, big government, and both believe that the people are to stupid to make decisions for themselves.


30 posted on 08/12/2005 8:08:13 AM PDT by TheFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

I agree,

While I don't really fit the profile of most posters on this board, I have never been accused of a being a Hillary-lover"


31 posted on 08/12/2005 8:12:17 AM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: meandog
"VOTE LIBERTARIAN!"

I would say that voting Libertarian would split the narrow Republican lead, giving the DemoRats control. I support Libertatiran individuals taking over the Republican Party through election primarys, but we can't shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the DemoRats to win elections because of "Constitution" or "Libertarian" party votes. We had Klinton for 8 years when he got less than 50% of votes. Remember Perot?
Reform the Republicans from within.
32 posted on 08/12/2005 8:25:04 AM PDT by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76
Have you failed to notice that liberals have great disdain for capitalism. Look at their constant berating of big business and the wealthy. I did a test amongst a few liberal friends, and the word "capitalism" elicits negative responses in and of itself.

Their socialist programs are only stepping stones to full on communism.
33 posted on 08/12/2005 8:56:04 AM PDT by Andrewksu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76
Uh, have you heard of the latest Eminent Domain cases? Baby steps!

The only private property that liberals respect is their own, the rest of us should live in ultra-dense slums and work for passes to visit the protected wilderness.
34 posted on 08/12/2005 8:59:51 AM PDT by Andrewksu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

Bookmark Bump!


35 posted on 08/12/2005 9:09:21 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrewksu

Please don't assume I am a liberal, or that I am particulaly sympathetic to liberal causes, I am not.

I just feel the modern Democratic Party, of which I have little use, is a far cry from Communism.



36 posted on 08/12/2005 9:13:28 AM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
Image hosted by Photobucket.com The Peoples DemocRATic Party of america
37 posted on 08/12/2005 9:22:50 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey
Should Democratic Party merge with Communist Party?

Already has but doesn't want you to know it!

38 posted on 08/12/2005 9:25:25 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76
That would make an ASS out of U and ME. I am just pointing to the dots that should be connected.

The Democrats try to put on a face more palatable than what they really are. Just take note of the outburst of Biden, Kennedy, Pelosi, Durbin, etc and you see a glimpse of their true beliefs. I argue that Democrat politicians are far left of what most people believe and farther left of most people they represent.
39 posted on 08/12/2005 9:27:40 AM PDT by Andrewksu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76
I just feel the modern Democratic Party, of which I have little use, is a far cry from Communism.

I'm certainly willing to be enlightened on that point. Show me a substantive difference.

40 posted on 08/12/2005 9:29:37 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX; meandog; Mikey
I would say that voting Libertarian would split the narrow Republican lead, giving the DemoRats control

The Two-Party System is a big problem. While I detest multi-party systems (Italy, France, Germany, etc.) and proportional representation, I would like a Third Party and a Fourth.

How do we get there without handing the country over to another Clinton? One constitutional amendment is definitely needed: Our President ought to be voted in with over 50%. I think in a run-off, GHWB would have beaten Clinton. Perhaps even Dole!

41 posted on 08/12/2005 9:29:53 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Andrewksu

"I argue that Democrat politicians are far left of what most people believe and farther left of most people they represent"

I don't disagree, but would you say that Republicans are any more honest?

Really, Democrats promise big goverment, and they deliver, Republicans promise small government, an gives us big goverment.


42 posted on 08/12/2005 9:32:17 AM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

I think it should just go to H#ll!


43 posted on 08/12/2005 9:38:44 AM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JusticeForAll76
Yes, but it is a loaded question, we're dealing with politicians here, so many, by nature, do whatever is necessary to increase/prolong their power.

I certainly have more faith in the Republican party, but we the people must always apply pressure to keep them in the lanes. Thankfully, due to sites such as Freerepublic, we have better access to information, and a collected voice that can help us reel the suckers back in.

It all takes time and issues such as the fair tax/flat tax, social security reform, Medicare reform, malpractice reform, and a more constructionist SCOTUS are on the table and require constant pressure from us to make them reality.
44 posted on 08/12/2005 9:57:42 AM PDT by Andrewksu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

They endorsed John Kerry in 2004. What more needs to be said?


45 posted on 08/12/2005 10:09:23 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Why? Ask Jamie Gorelick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

You should all go read the link to the Congressional Record posted in the article and read the Communist Goals there. Most of them have already been enacted.


46 posted on 08/12/2005 10:49:17 AM PDT by Sweetjustusnow ("Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty." John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

Yes.


47 posted on 08/15/2005 12:46:20 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberals-beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey

"Should Democratic Party merge with Communist Party?"
you mean they haven't?
as for voting for Constitution party i am not going to pull a Perot and let another Clinton in the white house


48 posted on 08/15/2005 12:47:40 PM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

So true. They have already. My wife said just that.


49 posted on 08/15/2005 12:52:30 PM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson