Posted on 08/12/2005 7:32:41 AM PDT by stuckinNY-NJ
Yes, it's a tactic used by many on this Web site. Just because they have been posting a long time, they all stick together. Just look at the list of people who have been attacking you and you'll know who's in the "group".
Dissention is allowed only if they are dissenting also.
Cutting off anyone's opinion is not something I would ever choose to do. Diverse opinion is what this forum is about.
After observing this person for several days, I raised what I considered to be a legitimate question: whether his motives were about something other than discussion and debate.
As for the Nazi thing, a conservative site is not a place one would normally expect to find radical feminist members (femi-Nazis); OTOH, Nazi IS consistent with the radical LEFT'S stereotype of conservatives. I stand by my statement.
That said, stuckin's explanation is plausible, i.e., he views a Pirro supporter a radical feminist by definition.
Pirro is corrupt. So is Hillary. Its a wash.
Watch how many (R)'s vote for her, tho'.
Pirro will support:
So there is every difference in the world between Pirro and clinton. And this doesn't begin to discuss hillary clinton's corruption, betrayal and ineptitude. Or the rapes and other predation. Let us not forget that it was hillary clinton who hired Jamie Gorelick. Gorelick proceeded to do hillary clinton's bidding, which undermined the national security and was the efficient cause of 9/11.
The contrast between these two women could not be more stark.
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) New York, New York -- if hillary can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere |
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD
madhillary.com (coming soon)
madhillary.blogspot.com
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
Well, I agree with your first paragraph. You sound reasonable to me.
However, Pirro IS a radical feminist so he was correct. She believes in abortion. This person's point was that there are better choices to be made for Republicans and I agree with that comment.
However, I welcome Pirro and Clinton tearing each other apart because their positions are very similar...even down to their husbands.
I've never watched Seinfield so what you said was lost on me. Pretty good joke, though. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.