Ah, excuse me. I did fail to ping you, didn't I. And yet with only you, I and Him here, you managed to see it. How does that work? ;)
Take a break. You seem to need one.
Strike my last attack on you I read the one atacking me behind my back before I replied to the big issue.
Look, you seem to have a major misunderstanding of me and of my whole argument. Thats fine. Its easy to do, look its over.
My whole point of sticking with the levitical argument was that you said either take all of GODs word or none of it at all, if you had however quoted Jesus and the food or the story of the stoning of the prostiture(which, correct me if I am wrong deals directly with the punishment issue of the levitical laws), This argument would have ended along time ago.
That being said, the reason being is that the way I was interpreting your answers(and btw you are very knowledgable on the bible far more than me anyways) was that you seemed to put forth biblical philosophy rather than biblical fact, and by doing so I felt in my argumentative mind that negates the argument as that which began between us, either take it at its word or dont take it at all, in other words what would my philosophical reasoning behind evolution and creation differ from philosophising on what Jesus meant, what is the new judgements and what have you.
I know in your mind there is a big difference, and thats fine. But at least see what my argument is there.