[TAquinas]

"Though apparently some do(!), I wouldn't call it an "Explusion" either."

And right you are. An expulsion it is not. Their stay on Gaza and the West Bank was a temporary stay since it never was their lands. A better way of putting it would be a "transfer of population" or an even better one, "rectification of frontiers."

[agrace]

Their stay on Gaza and the West Bank was a temporary stay since it never was their lands.

How so?

[E Rocc]

Their stay on Gaza and the West Bank was a temporary stay since it never was their lands.

A point often forgetten here. Israel never quite had the nerve to defy international (including American) opinion by actually annexing Gaza or the West Bank.

-Eric

[Diddle E. Squat]

While not taking sides, I have no problem with someone calling it an "Expulsion".

First thread title: "Gaza Disengagement/Explulsion Live Thread"

Second (modified) title: "Gaza Disengagement/Explusion Live Thread"

Third version?...

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

A better way of putting it would be a "transfer of population" or an even better one, "rectification of frontiers."

Or from Pali view, the "ethnic cleansing" of Gaza. Next stop, the West Bank and Jerusalem.

[Bella_Bru]

Not their land? Are you going to give back your land to your local Indian tribe or Britain anytime soon?

Israel was attacked and won a battle. Generally, the spoils of war got to the victor. Except for Israel of course, right?