1 posted on
08/16/2005 3:06:13 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Dick Durbin BEFORE he dick's you!!
2 posted on
08/16/2005 3:16:01 PM PDT by
GeorgeW23225
(Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true.)
To: neverdem
Or:
3. Following in the footsteps of the Clinton Treasury official who lied to his diary, Shoemaker lied to an answering machine...and, also following the Clinton model, Durbin just plain lied.
To: neverdem
Durbin, again...
"A dog returns to its vomit" and "A sow that is washed goes back to its wallowing in the mud".
6 posted on
08/16/2005 3:34:27 PM PDT by
Christian4Bush
(The modern Democratic Party: Attacking our defenders and defending our attackers.)
To: neverdem
At this pont we may have to consider an alternative explanation for Turbin's gaffes: dementia? Liberalitis? LBF?(Liberal brain fatigue)
7 posted on
08/16/2005 3:36:49 PM PDT by
eleni121
(ual9fyiung for student aid nd taking clleg level course at the same time!)
To: neverdem
There are two alternatives to this explanation:1. Durbin got confused and gave Turley an inaccurate account of what was said at the meeting, and Shoemaker, also confused, verified that account, or at the very least failed to challenge it; or
2. Turley, a media-friendly professor and legal commentator who has written roughly 500 articles, picked this point in his career to start making stuff up.
Uh, no. There certainly are other alternatives. I don't believe that Durbin and Shoemaker "got confused" at all. I think the scumbags were deliberately using Turley to spread political disinformation.
To: neverdem
"The only condition under which you can use [the story] is not to identify our office, not identify Durbin, and to say that this came up in the course of several meetings with several senators."So the condition for Turley using the story was to lie about it! I don't think so little of Turley that I believe he would be willing to trash his reputation over this.
11 posted on
08/16/2005 4:39:51 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(Air America: kids-for-kilowatts)
To: neverdem
Tonmy Snow was telling us that Turley and his wife recently had a chiild and that is why he has been quite on this story.
15 posted on
08/16/2005 5:41:42 PM PDT by
mware
(Trollhunter of Note)
To: neverdem
As long as this is only reported on in the Washington Times it may as well have not happened. For all practical purposes, Democrats can say whatever they want.
18 posted on
08/16/2005 6:56:17 PM PDT by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: neverdem
According to two people who attended the meeting, Roberts was asked by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) what he would do if the law required a ruling that his church considers immoral... Roberts should have asked Durbin what he'd do if he were required to take some action that was moral...would he recuse himself?
21 posted on
08/17/2005 12:30:51 AM PDT by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson