Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nuconvert
Economists, in particular, believe the supply and demand equation will spur innovation and conservation, and the problem will take care of itself.

The most cogent comment in the whole article. Energy (oil) became more expensive in the 70's. We adjusted. Energy is (obviously) becoming more expensive now. We'll adjust. Thermal depolymerization, tar sands, improved drilling and extraction, etc. all await. To say nothing of the simple fact that as the price per barrel makes more "estimated" reserves "proven" reserves.

20 posted on 08/24/2005 6:30:04 AM PDT by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat [Quicquid peius optimo nefas])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: L,TOWM
We adjusted. Energy is (obviously) becoming more expensive now. We'll adjust. Thermal depolymerization, tar sands, improved drilling and extraction, etc. all await.

And liberals and eco-wackos and all their kept politicians (which the current administration refuses to confront) standing in the way the whole 9-yards. Look at Jeb Bush and the California wackos opposing even SLANT DRILLING...which leaves no visible coastline footprint or oil leakage whatsoever. And while I'm on that, where the HELL is all that 1 trillion barrels of U.S. SHALE OIL we were told could be economically processed at the market price of $35/barrell??? Seems to me that someone has that locked up tighter than, a'hem...a drum. Wildcatters inventing new processes for extraction are claiming even better prices than the $35/barrel cost...how about $10? I.e,.:

"A Utah-based, privately held corporation called Oil Tech, Inc., says it has developed and installed an improved surface retorting process that can produce shale oil for less than $10 a barrel. Located in eastern Utah, the company says that Unified Engineering witnessed a demonstration of the new technology..."

If the goal is not to more or less secretly "drain the swamp of terrorists, by DRAINING THEIR OIL SUPPLY FIRST" then the Western World is just proceeding on an adhoc basis with no clear production agenda, and just letting the tail wag the dog. Heck, not even the tail. THE FLEAS are running the show with the environmentalist-wackos saying what we will be alllowed to do.

To put the shale-oil trillion barrel reserve of the U.S. into perspective....note that Saudia Arabian oil fields have "proven" reserves officially pegged at 261.9 billion barrels, but this can't be independently verified...and is a state-secret. Then taking all the other oil fields in current production or on tap...the following excerpt from the San Francisco Chronicle notes the global number at 1.3 trillion:

"Oil-producing companies and countries publish estimates of their proven reserves -- essentially, the amount of oil they can pump with existing technology under current market conditions. It all adds up to about 1.3 trillion barrels worldwide, enough to keep humanity's cars, factories and power plants humming for 42 years at our present level of consumption."

One trillion barrels of U.S. shale oil could keep the U.S. humming along at our current per capita oil consumption for over 400 years. And we are only a little over 200 years old as a country. And by then, indeed, we will have found something else.

If only we could bring back Reagan and James Watts.

94 posted on 08/24/2005 8:00:34 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Definition of strict constructionist: someone who DOESN'T hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson