Here we go again
1 posted on
08/24/2005 6:39:36 PM PDT by
wjersey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: wjersey
Is there just no stopping these MORONS ?????
2 posted on
08/24/2005 6:40:50 PM PDT by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: wjersey
Perhaps we should get the guvmint out of such esoteric undertakings to avoids such lawsuits in the future.
3 posted on
08/24/2005 6:42:23 PM PDT by
Thebaddog
(How's yer dogs?)
To: wjersey
Does this mean I can sue McDonalds for all the garbage thrown in my yard by bird watchers who eat at McDonalds?
4 posted on
08/24/2005 6:44:36 PM PDT by
BykrBayb
(Impeach Judge Greer - In memory of Terri <strike>Schiavo</strike> Schindler - www.terrisfight.org)
To: wjersey
So basically, a judge just opened a back door to usurp the legislature and take over environmental policy.
5 posted on
08/24/2005 6:44:44 PM PDT by
Dreagon
To: wjersey
This one really deserves this:
8 posted on
08/24/2005 6:52:52 PM PDT by
Road Warrior ‘04
(Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
To: wjersey
There is a lot of good science that debunks this Global Warming poppycock. I hope the attorneys for the plaintiffs bring all of it out in open court.
9 posted on
08/24/2005 6:52:56 PM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("It's a 'dog eat dog' world out there and I'm wearing Milkbone underwear.")
To: wjersey
"This is the first decision in the country to say that climate change causes sufficient injury to give a plaintiff standing, to open the courthouse door," said Ronald Shems, a Vermont attorney representing Friends of the Earth. What a combination, an a***ole and a moron!
The decision said no such thing!
The decision (still to be validated) is that this judge believes that they have standing to sue. I disagree.
Whether climate change can be shown to be man-made (I love the "climate change" gambit), and consequently actionable is a whole other thing.
I see a few thousand amici curiae signing on to prove the plaintiffs are fraudulent, ignorant imbeciles, with a wannabe cavedweller death wish.
11 posted on
08/24/2005 6:54:01 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: wjersey
I'm waiting for someone who is unemployed to sue the enviro-terriorests because of loss of employment!
To: wjersey
bring it on, as they say.
14 posted on
08/24/2005 6:55:04 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(see my FR page for a link to the tribute to Terri Schaivo, a short video presentation.)
To: wjersey
Jeffrey White is the kind of activist jughead we need to get rid of. Little Jeffrey, Jeffrey, Jeffrey thinks he's some kind of little god. What the hell does a "judge" know about science? Global warming HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN. This jughead White needs to stay on familiar ground and disregard everything that this bunch of anti-capitalist wackos tell him.
15 posted on
08/24/2005 6:57:38 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
To: wjersey
Hmmmmm.....wonder if we can sue the UN for ineptness? If I were a Nigerian or Sudanese I'd be trying....
16 posted on
08/24/2005 6:58:53 PM PDT by
goodnesswins
(Our military......the world's HEROES!)
To: wjersey
So IF they were actually able to prove global warming and IF they were able to prove some sort of damages, who gets a share of the judgment, everyone on the planet?
To: wjersey
Junk Judges and Junk Science.
18 posted on
08/24/2005 7:02:23 PM PDT by
harpo11
(Clinton's Wall of Separation--Terrorists Attacked Our Nation)
To: wjersey
I wanted it to rain today, but it didn't. I'm a victim! Who can I sue?
To: wjersey
Wow - it's Crichton's "State of Fear". Great book - his plot is very similar to this story.
23 posted on
08/24/2005 7:13:14 PM PDT by
SuzyQue
(Remember to think.)
To: wjersey
I can't wait until they sue a volcano!
Mark
24 posted on
08/24/2005 7:17:05 PM PDT by
MarkL
(It was a shocking cock-up. The mice were furious!)
To: wjersey
..a Vermont attorney representing Friends of the Earth.They should stick to making sandals and syrup in Vermont and leave science to scientists instead of the Tort punks.
26 posted on
08/24/2005 7:20:39 PM PDT by
WideGlide
(That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
To: wjersey
One more "judge" that needs immediate impeachment. do not pass go - do not collect 200 rubles.
To hell with them if our politicians and other so-called representatives don't do their jobs and trash these POS lawyer scums.
Oh - I forgot - most of them are lawyers themselves - that's why they refuse.
To: wjersey
The decision is pretty narrow. It was about standing, not the merits, or whether a cause of action was stated. The latter issue comes next. Just what the basis is for the standing is not stated in the article.
30 posted on
08/24/2005 7:24:48 PM PDT by
Torie
To: wjersey
A federal judge here said.....
Ah! the key to the whole mess, when we clean up the SCOTUS this BS will end and with it the arrogance of the left. There days are numbered.
32 posted on
08/24/2005 7:28:03 PM PDT by
TheForceOfOne
(The alternative media is our Enigma machine.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson