Why Isn’t Bush On The Border? (Idiot Pat Buchanan Suggests Bush Impeachment! BARF ALERT!)

Tracy Press ^ | 8/29/05

[FergusMacRoich]

I am not a "Buchananite", and fyi, name me ONE politician who is not a "media whore". They are synonymous.

I do however, find Pat Buchanan to be much more credible than George Bush. I guess that means Pat ain't as good a whore as George.

[FergusMacRoich]

I figure that sealing the borders is not only in my best interest, but in the best interest of my country. Does that make me a buffoon and a media whore? Pat is right, and you have let your ideology over-ride your reason.

If Bush is too indebted to his backers to do the right thing, then he should step down and let someone else do what needs to be done.

[FergusMacRoich]

And the price of gas doesn't depend one iota on whether its a republican or a democrat in power.

[af_vet_rr]

I was just floored when I heard where the "vigilante" comment occurred and wasn't sure if others knew.

I wasn't quite that floored, being from Texas, having been acutely aware of the history of the border region (because of my family's history) and where it's headed, I've seen this coming.

The groundwork was being laid even before President Bush was Governor Bush, although he was certainly buddy-buddy with his Mexican counterparts back then.

Even the passport thing with Canada and Mexico - that's a bone they tossed the people worried about national security (and those requirements will be dropped in a few years if nothing happens). When you have so many Republicans in Congress who support CFR, etc., it's not hard to see that the GOP is being aggressive in going after certain portions of the population.

Ask yourself this - is the GOP willing to take the chance that nothing will come of having unsecure borders, in order to gain more Hispanic votes (and thereby win more elections in the future).

[eagles]

I agree. Who can assure us that the next "Mohammad Atta" hasn't already crossed our southern border to set up a terror cell that will make 9/11 a postnote in history. What's the point of screening visitors to our country who use mass transit to get in when half a million illegals cross our borders every year??!!!

[af_vet_rr]

I agree. Who can assure us that the next "Mohammad Atta" hasn't already crossed our southern border to set up a terror cell that will make 9/11 a postnote in history. What's the point of screening visitors to our country who use mass transit to get in when half a million illegals cross our borders every year??!!!

This is my favorite example, and it's not second-hand or third-hand, I have had the opportunity to observe it first hand.

I can goto the airport with my mother, and one or both of us will be harassed. We'll spend hours sitting and waiting around, etc. My 80-something mother is treated like a potential terrorist.

Meanwhile, just six or so hours away by car from my house, people are walking across the border.

[Borax Queen]

I can goto the airport with my mother, and one or both of us will be harassed.

Yep - I am SO (not) look forward to flying this Labor Day - when I will have to undergo secondary inspections and humiliation for refusing to remove my flip flops - because I don't want to catch a foot fungus. Meanwhile, not even an hour south of the airport, they keep pouring in by the hundreds of thousands. They don't even have to sneak the nuke in - with the open borders we have, they can drive it across easily enough. And, probably already have.

[riri]

And the price of gas doesn't depend one iota on whether its a republican or a democrat in power

I know that and you know that...but people become irrational about gas costs and ATM fees.

[fallujah-nuker]

"I am not a "Buchananite", and fyi, name me ONE politician who is not a "media whore". They are synonymous.

I do however, find Pat Buchanan to be much more credible than George Bush. I guess that means Pat ain't as good a whore as George."

I notice that a number of posters are baffled by the concept of agreeing with someone on some issues, and disagreeing with them on others. They seem to be sycophants for the most part who idolize President Bush, so I suppose they cannot help but view others through the same prism.

I recall a poster on another thread who was irate with other posters who opposed CAFTA. His response was to post a picture of Hugo Chavez hugging Fidel Castro, and claimed that since Chavez opposed CAFTA anyone else who opposed it was a fan of Hugo Chavez! Later in the same thread he supported nuclear power (I do too), it would have been amusing had someone posted a picture of Lyndon LaRouche and applied his own logic against him!

[fallujah-nuker]

"..."Luv ya Dubya" sycophants..."

Very descriptive.

[fallujah-nuker]

"...If it is a nuclear event...he will be convicted...if not; no conviction. Depends on the body count and the level of American anger..."

Very true, the anger aroused after 9-11 would reappear and be focused against President Bush.

[budwiesest]

If Bush winds up getting impeached for dereliction of duty, thats his choice.

The whole fed should be impeached. They simply are not doing the job of 'repelling' an invasion. They don't respect your right to arms (among many other things), and will ultimately decide whether or not a cell phone or a finger in your nose are distractions to driving.

[mthom]

Yeah, nobody really cares about massive illegal immigration. Its all just an excuse to attack Bush.