[Tarpon]

I think the article refers to less than 50% of the papers providing conclusions stand the test of time, and or rigorous open peer review.

Results that are not reproducible are not to be believed, a classic is global warming where we have one study, the Mann study, that all the libs like to latch onto to prove man caused global warming, while at the same time denying respectability to contrary views.

[ARCADIA]

Results that are not reproducible are not to be believed

That describes the normal scientific process, with all of its wrong turns,frustrating dead ends, and slow but eventual progress.