Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BamaGOP; AuH2ORepublican; JohnnyZ; Kuksool; Clintonfatigued

The question is whether she'll be able to benefit from the expected battle royale between Riley and Moore. Right now, I'm leaning towards Moore (but anyone is better than Riley at this point).


6 posted on 08/30/2005 5:15:54 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (*Fightin' the system like a $2 hooker on crack*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

I remember a Wisconsin 'Rat Senate primary in 1992. Two well-known, well-funded candidates beat each other up, and an obscure, underfunded state legislator named Russ Feingold benefitted from a backlash against both of them.

If Bob Riley vs. Roy Moore turns into a mudslinging contest, I can see Smith reaping similar benefits.


7 posted on 08/30/2005 5:31:40 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj

The Katrina Storm and Natalie may boost Riley's approval ratings. Plus, when Roy Moore starts campaigning, many moderates upset with Riley's attempted tax increases, may swing back to Riley just because Riley is not Roy Moore.


12 posted on 08/30/2005 6:27:16 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson