Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REHNQUIST'S FUNERAL BEGINS
The New York Times ^ | September 6, 2005 | Richard W. Stevenson

Posted on 09/06/2005 8:13:48 AM PDT by alessandrofiaschi

Chief Justice Rehnquist's pallbearers included Judge John G. Roberts, who had been nominated by President Bush to fill the Supreme Court seat being vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

Judge Roberts, who was once a law clerk for Chief Justice Rehnquist, has now been selected by the president to succeed Mr. Rehnquist as chief justice of the United States. Confirmation hearings for Judge Roberts will likely begin next week.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: chiefjustice; inrepose; justice; rehnquist; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: savedbygrace

Not only is the Chief Justice dead, but apparently so is reverence and decency (at least on this thread).


21 posted on 09/06/2005 8:20:33 AM PDT by Coop (www.heroesandtraitors.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

Yes. I apologize for the typo. I was in hurry-up mode. In fact, if I were still in hurry-up mode, I might call it hurry-up mdoe.

Please forgive me.


22 posted on 09/06/2005 8:22:58 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

I wonder if Buah was there for the funeral bebins?
If not it is a hugh mistake seriesly.

How's that!!!


23 posted on 09/06/2005 8:23:07 AM PDT by NormB (Yes, but watch your cookies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

Agreed.


24 posted on 09/06/2005 8:23:30 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
You got me on that one. I have no idea what Souter is up to. I don't think that it's he's too grief stricken to attend.
25 posted on 09/06/2005 8:24:00 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Coop

A tip of my hat for the dead. May we carry on his fight for what is right and good.


26 posted on 09/06/2005 8:24:32 AM PDT by Ingtar (Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
Souter is in New Hampshire I heard. Why isn't he paying his respects?

Protecting his land?

27 posted on 09/06/2005 8:26:42 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

No, we all make typoes...
lol


28 posted on 09/06/2005 8:30:48 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Borges
According to conglomerate.org David E. Salisbury finished #2 in the Stanford class of 1952.
29 posted on 09/06/2005 8:32:59 AM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Thanks! He must have pangs of bitterness!


30 posted on 09/06/2005 8:35:15 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Borges
They were 1 and 3 in the Stanford Law Class of 1952 right? I wonder who Number 2 was and how they feel about not making it to the Supreme Court.

Actually it is conceded by all of the members of the 1952 class that Rehnquist was #1 in the class of 102. O'Connor is alleged to have been #3 but there are apparently 99 students who have laid claim to the #2 slot.

That would mean that O'Connor finished last.

31 posted on 09/06/2005 8:39:17 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Not only is the Chief Justice dead, but apparently so is reverence and decency (at least on this thread).
I don't know about Rehnquist, he was a very private person. But either Barry Goldwater or Ronald Reagan would very likely have enjoyed the quips, on their own threads.

-Eric

32 posted on 09/06/2005 8:40:42 AM PDT by E Rocc (Anyone who thinks Bush-bashing is banned from FR has never read a Middle East thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

Souter's probably packing up his belongings since the town might take his farm through eminent domain. Hehehehehe. But he should have gone back to DC for the funeral. His absence is shameful.


33 posted on 09/06/2005 8:41:57 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

As I've said elsewhere, Souter's sitting on his front porch with a shotgun in case anyone tries to "eminent domain" his property.

Dan


34 posted on 09/06/2005 8:44:20 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
Slightly more seriously....

Maybe Souter just doesn't want to deal with all the people who would look at the coffin, then turn and look at him, and shake their heads.

Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG

35 posted on 09/06/2005 8:46:35 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi; All; hflynn

36 posted on 09/06/2005 8:59:38 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

The faces of grief.


37 posted on 09/06/2005 9:00:47 AM PDT by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

38 posted on 09/06/2005 9:03:12 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
The two of them dated when they were both much younger. It's true.

Is this true? seriously? So how come the media did not exploit this ratings nugget? (this is out of character for the medial)

39 posted on 09/06/2005 9:03:21 AM PDT by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Stop making sense and give us a harrumph.
40 posted on 09/06/2005 9:05:05 AM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg. Gosh I miss her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson