Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ontos-on
I mean, GW appears to have a close personal relation with AG Gonzales, and it is obvious that the AG could not be counted on to counsel in the manner which we would believe appropriate.

Get real. Gonzales was in charge of vetting all of Bush's nominees during the first four years, and there was not a single complaint from conservatives on the type of judges being selected.

And if Gonzales was so liberal and awful, why did he allow such good judges to be nominated?

57 posted on 09/06/2005 6:02:59 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
And if Gonzales was so liberal and awful, why did he allow such good judges to be nominated?

Good point, but still, I cannot bear to see a gun-grabber nominated. Someone who supported the Assault Weapons Ban has no business being anywhere near the SCOTUS.

87 posted on 09/07/2005 11:01:53 AM PDT by jmc813 ("Small-government conservative" is a redundancy, and "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson