To: wagglebee; Admin Moderator; jimrob; Neets; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; Conspiracy Guy; ...
megaping of
PURE
UNADULTERATED
FURY
36 posted on
09/10/2005 2:03:10 PM PDT by
King Prout
(and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
To: King Prout
MOHAMMED WAS A PEDOPHILE
44 posted on
09/10/2005 2:22:23 PM PDT by
Lady Jag
(The Goat-Vendor of Hamelin, and Expounder of Troll Logic)
To: King Prout
To: King Prout
It appears to be National in nature since it is called National and it is a religious symbol. Who is paying for it?
52 posted on
09/10/2005 2:42:39 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(We in heep dip trubble)
To: King Prout
I don't know if my reaction qualifies as fury, but certainly as pure unadulterated contempt. The only question I have is whether the Muslim iconography is accidental. That is, whether the designers actually had that in mind when they proposed it, or whether it was someone else who noticed the patently self-evident..
54 posted on
09/10/2005 2:45:34 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: King Prout
trying to figure out which is worse... this one, or the one in NYC???
62 posted on
09/10/2005 3:08:45 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: King Prout
Just so wrong. They can't go forward with this!
76 posted on
09/10/2005 3:45:10 PM PDT by
grellis
(Femininist. Think about it.)
To: King Prout
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson