Posted on 09/13/2005 2:40:42 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
That's what I was thinking, too.
no nukes for mullahs
I'm currently test marketing "Dead E. Roosevelt" and "Pedro."
"Is that Kerry or Bush?"
Or Clinton, with the north koreans. What a disaster.
Yes!
What about the "civilian nuclear program" in the US?
thats a good one..but not in my backyard please...:)
Do "Pedro." You'd have the youth and the Latino vote tied up.
WHAT???????
Check this one!
President Ahmadinejad arrives in New York
http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0509143949083253.htm
Say wha...?? So much for the republican revolution...
The current US policy on Iraq (allowing the Shia to take power) makes no sense unless the US and Iran make up their differences and become friends. This would make two of the world's biggest oil producers allies. Oil is the only really important factor in play here. It will of course take a bit of diplomatic effort (like this statement by Bush), but would be well worth it for the USA. A pro-US Iran is the only thing that would stabilise Iraq in the long run. It's blindingly obvious. The Iraq insurgency is Iran's way of inducing the US to meet it halfway. Wait and see!
The current US policy on Iraq (allowing the Shia to take power) makes no sense unless the US and Iran make up their differences and become friends. This would make two of the world's biggest oil producers allies. Oil is the only really important factor in play here. It will of course take a bit of diplomatic effort (like this statement by Bush), but would be well worth it for the USA. A pro-US Iran is the only thing that would stabilise Iraq in the long run. It's blindingly obvious. The Iraq insurgency is Iran's way of inducing the US to meet it halfway. Wait and see!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.