Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intelligent Design The Scientific Alternative to Evolution
THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC BIOETHICS QUARTERLY ^ | AUTUMN 2003 | William S. Harris and John H. Calvert

Posted on 09/13/2005 4:20:14 PM PDT by rob777

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-219 next last
To: Perspicac

How does a couple of passages from an old book make the creationists' position more "logical" than the atheists'?


81 posted on 09/13/2005 8:41:34 PM PDT by JasonSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Perspicac
. The logic upon which all science rests requires the induction of certain presuppositions. These presuppositions can be proven neither right nor wrong.

And they are...?

82 posted on 09/13/2005 8:50:48 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Astromut; js1138; JasonSC
And If evolution does not explain the origins of life...then Intelligent Design is REQUIRED!

It's that sort of thinking that would have eliminated the need to discover microscopic life. Ever heard of the (long discredited) "active principle" concept? It was an ideological cul-de-sac just like Intelligent Design. Fortunately, logical men like Louis Pasteur refused to accept that concept as a be-all, end-all answer for difficult questions and looked closer at the matter. It was from his Pasteur's refusal to accept pseudoscience as an answer that we now understand how microscopic organisms play a role in the world.

That's what scientists do. They don't accept nebulous answers. They keep looking, even when others insist there is no need to look further.

Leave science to answer "how" and theology to answer "why." Do not mix.

83 posted on 09/13/2005 8:59:35 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Astromut
I ask again...what did the first life live off of?

Animals don't eat rocks!

So when life first began...it required other life at the same time....and that life required life...

So did a whole ECOSYSTEM evolve all at once?

Unlikely

Please reply without insult.

Nice try. Circular reasoning. See: reasoning, circular.

You ask, what did first life live off of? Don't know. Evidence suggests that early (not necessarily the first) life did live and reproduce and evolve. We're here, aren't we? Whether I know how it happened or not is not relevant.

You say, animals don't eat rocks. When did animals first emerge? Plants essentially eat rocks, so could the first life have resembled plants more than animals?

84 posted on 09/13/2005 9:05:47 PM PDT by onewhowatches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
OK

How did a whole Ecosystem Evolve at the same time?

or

How did a living being live off nonliving matter?
85 posted on 09/13/2005 9:06:33 PM PDT by Astromut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Astromut
How did a whole Ecosystem Evolve at the same time?

I doubt it. The fossil record indicates that 99% of all life of this planet has long since been rendered extinct.

This is a pretty busy planet in terms of life. That speaks to a significantly long wind-up.

How did a living being live off nonliving matter?

Everything is non-living by the time it's ingested. When you get down to it, it's all a conversion of matter into energy through the breaking down of molecular matter. That's why, no matter what you eat, it all winds up in your bloodstream as glucose.

Heck, we even discovered a type of bacterium that lives in sulphurous water and eats the minerals out of rocks. We wouldn't have found it had it not been for Mount St. Helens blowing its stack and leaving a mess of those critters strewn about the mountainside.

86 posted on 09/13/2005 9:11:33 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: onewhowatches
"life did live and reproduce and evolve. We're here, aren't we? Whether I know how it happened or not is not relevant."

Your argument against circular reasoning is hollow....

We evolved because we are here...and we are here because we evolved?

If science hasn't taught you how it happened...maybe science needs help Designing an Intelligent explanation
87 posted on 09/13/2005 9:18:19 PM PDT by Astromut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Astromut
Nice try. We developed and evolved, but not sure of all the details, so God did it? That's what you are saying.

If science hasn't taught you how it happened...maybe science needs help Designing an Intelligent explanation

That's not science. More like witchcraft.
88 posted on 09/13/2005 9:29:24 PM PDT by onewhowatches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Your long post boils down to "if we don't know how it worked, then it must be intelligent design and therefor ID and (we're not admitting this, but CS, which is creation by the biblical diety)."

Just because we do not understand a process does not make it "God did it."

But that is the argument we are getting. "Its too complex for our little pea brains so God did it."

This is a faith-based solution. No problem with that. Just don't use a lack of scientific evidence as proof of something in science, and then suggest that it be taught in schools.

I've asked this on previous threads, but never received an answer. What would an ID curriculum be in a science class? What would you include in your lesson plan? I've asked this but never received an answer.

In a science class what would you teach? Remember, you have to stick to facts and theories, with no faith-based solutions, shamans, revelation, divine intervention, tarot cards, astrology, black magic, biblical passages, aching bunions, or what the neighbors think.

And sniveling about what you think evolution does not explain does not constitute evidence. You're designing the lesson plan, what evidence do you have?

89 posted on 09/13/2005 9:33:04 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Is this a good tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Astromut
If science hasn't taught you how it happened...maybe science needs help..

Science does not provide quick answers like faith does. It has taken us a few milinium to get this far in science.

90 posted on 09/13/2005 9:41:55 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (With faith anything is possible. With science only the possible is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Your long post boils down to "if we don't know how it worked, then it must be intelligent design and therefor ID and (we're not admitting this, but CS, which is creation by the biblical diety).

I'm sorry, but I do not believe that an honest man could possibly draw your conclusions from the words in my post.

I would be happy to discuss your take on what I actually said. Unless and until you can do so, I see no point in wasting my time on your blather.

91 posted on 09/13/2005 9:42:19 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Astromut

good arguments -you have them on the ropes... LOL


92 posted on 09/13/2005 9:50:24 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: slightlyovertaxed
Who designed the Designer?

The designer is outside the box. It is in the box of time, space and material that it is obvious that a design requires a designer. The designer lives in the realm of eternity. He is a pure spirit, pure intellect, wisdom and energy. His reality and existence is different than ours is. It looks like we and everything consist because He says we do. The LORD said let there be light and there was light. Jesus is The Word and The Word became flesh. Everything is apparently made up of perfectly encoded information and He is the source of that information.

95 posted on 09/13/2005 11:19:57 PM PDT by Bellflower (A new day is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

So God did make humans separate from other creatures! But that isn't what evolution says.


96 posted on 09/14/2005 3:24:02 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Astromut
Is there life today that can survive without biological substance?

The answer is yes. Haven't you figured this out yet? Are you home schooled?

97 posted on 09/14/2005 4:35:33 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: rob777

or Intelligent design, a powerful rationalization to soothe the minds.


98 posted on 09/14/2005 4:37:02 AM PDT by bert (K.E. ; N.P . I smell a dead rat in Baton Rouge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

And yet variation and selection continue to happen, right before our eyes.


99 posted on 09/14/2005 5:36:51 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820
That's because it's a _measurement_. A thermometer can't predict or explain new biological facts, either. That's because it's doing it's job measuring energy. Likewise, design detection is a measurement -- it measures the design within a system.

If that is the case, then what are the units of ID? What is the formula to calculate a unit of ID?
100 posted on 09/14/2005 5:47:50 AM PDT by TOWER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson