Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Loses a Jet to NATO (pictures)
Kommersant ^ | Sep. 16, 2005 | Vladimir Vodo, Ivan Safronov

Posted on 09/16/2005 10:52:40 AM PDT by lizol

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Echo Talon; GarySpFc
I also heard it was good.
Supposedly able to out-dog-fight the F-22s

Granted the F-22s can hit targets beyond the range of the SU-27s, but I thought that the SU-27s had some new vectoring that made them very manuverable.

21 posted on 09/16/2005 11:19:58 AM PDT by akorahil (consider this space filled with yet another witty and irreverent tag line instead of this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: akorahil
I also heard it was good. Supposedly able to out-dog-fight the F-22s

Granted the F-22s can hit targets beyond the range of the SU-27s, but I thought that the SU-27s had some new vectoring that made them very manuverable.

LOL... Try and kill something you cant see.

22 posted on 09/16/2005 11:22:41 AM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Not true.

If you get lost and know that you have only a few pounds of fuel left, you burn that off so when plane crashes it doesn't fire up the neighborhood.

The pilot followed SOP for ground safety.

He found a good spot, used up or dumped remaining fuel, bailed out.

Checklist followed.


23 posted on 09/16/2005 11:23:35 AM PDT by Al Gator (Remember to pillage BEFORE you burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
That's a case of U.S. issue MREs sitting on the ground next to him.

Well it is a Nato Country....

But your eyes are better than mine if you can read anything on that case. I've shopped it and I still can't read it.

24 posted on 09/16/2005 11:23:35 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
" the Corvair was a made-in-Detroit product"

There was nothing wrong (more than any other US made car) with the Corvair. It's demise though was just one of the first large examples of the Ralph propaganda machine...
25 posted on 09/16/2005 11:25:57 AM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

They made excellent aircraft. What they lacked in high-tech, they brute forced. What they lacked in quality, they made up for in quantity. The bearings in one of the Tumansky's that I saw were amazing - and this wasn't a show jet or a demonstration model - it was a line fighter. You could reach in between the front stators and spin the front spool by hand, and it would spin for another 20-30 seconds before winding down.


26 posted on 09/16/2005 11:28:22 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lizol

The Su-27 is a damm fine aircreft and Sukhoi produces some very good product...


27 posted on 09/16/2005 11:28:22 AM PDT by tophat9000 (This bulletin just in:"Chinese's Fire Drill's" will now be known as "New Orleans' Hurricane Drill's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Jotyskiai located.

Note to Russian Pilots: Crash somewhere easy to find next time.

28 posted on 09/16/2005 11:30:21 AM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator
He found a good spot, used up or dumped remaining fuel, bailed out.

Checklist followed.

Maybe for a world war II fighter. Not for a state of the art aircraft. There are multiple independent radio and nav systems in such a plane. All thats needed is a simple VOR or ADF receiver and the most rudimentary map to find your way to a suitable airport.

Further, look at that field. Flat as a pancake. He could have bellied it in more safely and perhaps salvaged the plane. But then, if he gets disoriented immediately after take off as the story reports, he probably didn't have the skill to slide in safely either.

Oh, well, this sh*t happens even to our pilots occasionally.

29 posted on 09/16/2005 11:31:51 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Peanut Gallery; Valin; alfa6; Iris7; SAMWolf

Fall down, go boom ping


30 posted on 09/16/2005 11:33:58 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (As an Engineer, you too can control the awesome power of the Ductalator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
one needs to be very, very careful about falling into perception traps of one's own making. that which may have been true fifteen years ago may or may *not* be true today.

lazy thinking, however ego-boosting, is way too dangerous. i just hope you are not in a position where you can actually influence any decisions...

31 posted on 09/16/2005 11:36:39 AM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lizol

I am missing something??? The pilot flew in cirlces until it ran out of fuel and ejected, just becuase he couldn't find his way home?

Dont russian pilots know how to navigate? Or was their some other curumstance such as bad weather that prevented him from finding his own way home?



32 posted on 09/16/2005 11:40:44 AM PDT by spookadelic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
You could reach in between the front stators and spin the front spool by hand, and it would spin for another 20-30 seconds before winding down.

Saw a C5 Galaxy sitting on the taxiway at an air-show reciently. Slight wind - barely enough to sense with a wetted raised finger.

Front spools were lazily "clicking" around. Of course with what seeme to me like an 8 foot opening thats a lot of area to collect even a small amount of wind.

33 posted on 09/16/2005 11:43:56 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lizol

The pilot was perplexed by all the fuss. "My flight path was close enough for government work," the Russian exclaimed.


34 posted on 09/16/2005 11:46:36 AM PDT by sono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spookadelic
Dont russian pilots know how to navigate? Or was their some other curumstance

It sounds fishy to me too. Even assuming all instruments out (which was not aledged), he still had a cell phone. Why not call home and have them vector him home?

Given that he had to put it down (for what ever reason) he may have been ordered to auger it in rather than try to land because the Russians realized they would never get the plane back anyway.

35 posted on 09/16/2005 11:48:02 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
We can not only thank Jimmy Carter for losing Iran but also for the rest of his Middle East and South Asian policies which saw the Soviet Union invading Afghanistan, the start of the Iraq/Iran war (9/22/1980), and a gross mishandling of Lebanon. If you really want to find the roots of our problems in the Middle East today, take a good look at the tooty nitwit from Plains, Georgia. Heck, even his greatest accomplishment of getting the Egyptians to sign a treaty with Israel hasn't turned out all that well over the years.
36 posted on 09/16/2005 11:49:11 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I owned a Corvair and a Greenbriar van (Corvair platform).

The only thing wrong with the Corvair was a young lawyer named Ralph Nader trying to make a name for himself.

37 posted on 09/16/2005 11:53:03 AM PDT by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
sorry tennessee bob. i meant my reply for owl eagle, not you...

russian stuff may not be the best, but it could well be "good enough", and that often is what wins wars, not necessarily the best equipment available.

38 posted on 09/16/2005 12:07:44 PM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lizol

All I can say is I have the utmost respect for Russian Scientists & Engineers. They have to design something so well it will work properly after being built by Russian industry.
Under the Soviet system, the design group designed the product and a manufacturing facility was assigned to produce it. Last month washing machines, this month fighter planes, next month tractors and so forth...what a system.


39 posted on 09/16/2005 12:34:56 PM PDT by Hiryusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol; All

Let's put the pieces together and research the items to seek what kind of technology is used by the fighter, if it is worth the value.


40 posted on 09/16/2005 12:39:19 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson