Replies

If the guy says it is scientific, why is he romantic about Darwin and don't show facts and logic? The author is talking about Darwinism, an ideology, he is not talking about Darwin and the science itself.

This is the big cult of repent to entitled scientists indoctrination trick.

And as for criticizing revelation, what does this have to do with Darwin? God is a revealed person. We know Him because we know what He will do. Science is about knowing what happened in the past and projecting it in the future into gizmos. They are two different independent concepts which do not necessarily exclude each other.

The author is not promoting science but a cult of repent to the likes of him, and he cannot see that coz he does not know God nor himself and his own unethical conflict of interests to discuss the matter.

In other words, those who do not trust him are liberaly labeled and "romanticized" as people needing some form of mental incarceration he himself in fact needs and is blackmailing sensical good people against.

"If the guy says it is scientific, why is he romantic about Darwin and don't show facts and logic? The author is talking about Darwinism, an ideology, he is not talking about Darwin and the science itself."

Could it be that Darwin is a "god"?

"This is the big cult of repent to entitled scientists indoctrination trick. "

Could it be the base of the entitlement era??

"And as for criticizing revelation, what does this have to do with Darwin? God is a revealed person. We know Him because we know what He will do. Science is about knowing what happened in the past and projecting it in the future into gizmos. They are two different independent concepts which do not necessarily exclude each other."

One cannot ignore at its base evolution rejects the Creator, thus they are 'gods'.

"The author is not promoting science but a cult of repent to the likes of him, and he cannot see that coz he does not know God nor himself and his own unethical conflict of interests to discuss the matter.

In other words, those who do not trust him are liberaly labeled and "romanticized" as people needing some form of mental incarceration he himself in fact needs and is blackmailing sensical good people against."

Well there is at least one word from Genesis the evolutionists do adhere to and use liberally and that word is "DOMINION". Seems there is a connection in how this word evolution is applied not only to the flesh body but to the mind, those liberals do call the Constitution a living evolving document.

If the guy says it is scientific, why is he romantic about Darwin and don't show facts and logic?

I see this observation every once in a while, and the childishness of it never ceases to amaze me.

Scientific analysis requires one to be objective, yes, but not inhuman.

The notion that it does is just ludicrous.