Skip to comments.
Israeli stem cell research shows umbilical cord blood can rejuvenate damaged heart tissue
Israel21c ^
| September 18, 2005
| David Brinn
Posted on 09/19/2005 1:17:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; cpforlife.org; MHGinTN; NYer
2
posted on
09/19/2005 1:18:40 PM PDT
by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: nickcarraway
3
posted on
09/19/2005 1:19:01 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(I was born in poverty. I didn't like it, so I left.............)
To: nickcarraway
More power to democratic Israel. I always found them sincere and smart.
To: nickcarraway
meanwhile today in "Palestine", 'ahmed abu mussa' figured out how to make a suicide belt explode giving greater control of the throw weight to the shahid...
5
posted on
09/19/2005 1:50:18 PM PDT
by
APRPEH
To: velocityguy
The use of stem cells to repair myocardial muscle was reported at the major lecture at the American Society of Hemtology meeting in 2002. Umbilical cord blood is a new twist but the principle is the same. Please chalk another up for America!
6
posted on
09/19/2005 1:53:03 PM PDT
by
AZFolks
To: AZFolks
To thing of it is: instead of all the brouhaha over stem cells, scientists should have and could have been looking at cord blood from the beginning. Methinks some abortion ideologues hijacked the bio-research field.
7
posted on
09/19/2005 3:01:32 PM PDT
by
NYCynic
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
..........................................
The treatment to be boycotted by some, I'm sure.
8
posted on
09/19/2005 4:26:54 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(“I worry that I've seen this movie before”, Rep. Mark Kirk on aid to palestinians.)
To: SJackson; neverdem
9
posted on
09/19/2005 5:09:58 PM PDT
by
bitt
('But once the shooting starts, a plan is just a guess in a party dress.' Michael Yon)
To: nickcarraway; Coleus; Peach; Mr. Silverback; airborne; Asphalt
10
posted on
09/19/2005 10:42:07 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: APRPEH
No kidding. One saves lives, one takes lives. Such a stark difference.
11
posted on
09/20/2005 5:42:42 AM PDT
by
veronica
("America has been killing people on this continent since it was started." - Mother Sheehan)
To: neverdem; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
12
posted on
09/20/2005 8:41:19 AM PDT
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: Coleus
Amazing stuff ... and it doesn't involve killing people, either.
13
posted on
09/20/2005 8:49:50 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: SJackson
What boycott?
Pro-lifers are all in favor of umbilical cord stem cell usage.
No soul is sacrified in the process.
To: George from New England; SJackson
Boycott was in reference to those who are choosing to "divest" from evil Israel.
Somehow the hypocrites are not rushing to divest from those Israeli products that may save their sorry asses.
I also doubt they will all toss their PC's.
http://tinyurl.com/aowvl
15
posted on
09/20/2005 12:47:10 PM PDT
by
Sabramerican
(Islam is to Peace as Rape is to Love)
To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis
| FutureTechPing! |
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop. |
|
|
|
16
posted on
09/20/2005 6:52:43 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
17
posted on
09/20/2005 6:54:11 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: AntiGuv
Why can't those umbilical cords be sold by the woman who gave birth? It's her tissue. It was thrown away in the past because it had no value, but now it has considerable value. So why not recognize it as her property? It might help to pay for at least some of the cost of the delivery. I don't see any ethical issues that could interfere with this. It's not as if she's selling her baby's tissue.
18
posted on
09/20/2005 7:02:29 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: George from New England
19
posted on
09/20/2005 8:04:36 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: AntiGuv
Thanks for ping. Great article!
20
posted on
09/20/2005 10:47:44 PM PDT
by
SeaLion
("Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man" -- Thomas Paine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson