Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police losing battle over pot, says prof
Owen Sound Sun Times (Canada) ^ | September 19, 2005

Posted on 09/21/2005 7:07:58 PM PDT by Know your rights

Police are losing the war against pot and it’s time to make it legal and regulate the cultivation and use of it, says Eugene Oscapella, an Ottawa University criminology teacher who co-founded the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy.

Police say the number and size of local marijuana operations they’re discovering is increasing.

In the last several weeks, police have laid charges after discovering more than $43-million worth of marijuana, mostly from four big busts. Monday West Grey police discovered another $1.3-million worth of marijuana growing south of Flesherton.

The biggest of recent busts have often involved young, Asia men. Police here can’t say if there are local links to Asian crime gangs. Last week, New Brunswick police blamed Asian gangs for moving east and setting up for large-scale grow operations in their province.

But regardless of who’s growing it, police say some of the larger marijuana grow operations are linked to organized crime.

Oscapella says people shouldn’t be misled into thinking these high-profile drug seizures which police present at news conferences will stem the tide much.

“Typically, they probably only get five to 10 per cent of the drugs that are coming into the country or being produced in the country,” said Oscapella, who lectures on drug policy issues to third-year criminology students at Ottawa University.

“These seizures make virtually no difference into the availability of the drug after a period of time. What they might do is take a few players out of the market, then others will move in.”

Oscapella is an Ottawa lawyer who has served on government commissions, chaired the Law Reform Commission of Canada’s drug policy group and is director of law reform for the Canadian Bar Association. He helped found the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, an independent organization to study Canada’s drug laws and policies.

He says police and courts have failed to stop marijuana growers and traffickers and their futile efforts have wasted hundreds of millions of dollars.

Half of all high school students in Ontario have tried marijuana by the time they graduate, he said. Fifty to 80 per cent of the students in his university classes have probably tried it too, he said.

The auditor general in December, 2001 determined the federal government spends $500 million a year dealing with drugs, 95 per cent of which goes to law enforcement.

“The people who are rigidly prohibitionist, they think that the police have the answer . . . and they trust the police,” he said. “Basically I trust the police but on drug policy issues, the police organizations are flat wrong.”

Oscapella says the same thing has happened with the cultivation and sale of illegal marijuana as happened when alcohol was prohibited early last century.

“The use of the criminal law to prohibit the production and sale of drugs like marijuana creates a fantastically profitable black market.”

He says a bushel of marijuana costs little more than a bushel of tomatoes to produce. “By criminalizing it, by prohibiting it on the black market, we have made it worth more than its weight in gold in some cases.”

Oscapella said the criminalization of marijuana use and production encourages the development of modern day Al Capones.

He favours a model proposed by a Senate special committee on illegal drugs in September, 2002. It basically recommended legalizing and regulating marijuana. It would be sold much like alcohol is today, with minimum ages for purchase at state-licensed outlets, like the Liquor Control Board of Ontario, including in some specially designated stores. Penalties for driving under the influence of marijuana already exist.

There would also be a licensing system for commercial marijuana growers, like large-scale alcohol distillers require. But anyone could grow small amounts in their own gardens.

“Yes, some people are harmed by marijuana,” he said. “People are harmed by jogging, by rock climbing, by snowmobiling — big in Owen Sound. People are harmed by many, many things. But do we ban those other things?”

Owen Sound Police Chief Tom Kaye said the reason police don’t have the upper hand on drug-growers is because of lenient court sentences.

“There is a huge amount of money involved in it, with little in the way of penalty that’s being handed out by the courts — not that the penalties aren’t on the books — but it’s just that the courts have taken a very laissez-faire approach,” to sentencing.

The 2004 former Molson factory marijuana grow operation in Barrie produced sentences of about 18 months, Kaye noted. That was touted as Canada’s biggest ever marijuana grow operation, with 30,000 plants which police said would be worth $30 million on the street.

“Down in the United States, the average sentencing down there for a grow op of much less is seven years in the penitentiary. So who’s got the bigger problem with grow ops? We do.”

Kaye, a former head of the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police, said that organization is having second thoughts about endorsing the federal government’s intention to decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana, which would remove the threat faced by young people who smoke a joint. Under the bill, possession of up to 15 grams of marijuana could lead to a fine of up to $150. Growing more than 50 plants could attract a prison term of up to 14 years.

Kaye said the police association is concerned that the legalization lobby has moved beyond decriminalization and is pushing to make the use of marijuana legal and it’s confusing the public. Even if people could grow marijuana in their backyards, he thinks governments would still be spending lots of money for police to chase marijuana growers, just like police are fighting contraband cigarette producers — to protect tax revenue.

Kaye said legalizing marijuana would be asking for trouble. He called it a “proven gateway drug,” meaning its use leads to harder drug use and polls show most people don’t want it legalized.

Oscapella says he’s never used marijuana and he’s not seeking to relax laws to allow him to start now. But using the law to enforce social policy doesn’t work, he argues.

“Why do some people use methamphetamines? Why do some use heroin? Why do some use cocaine? Prohibition never asks those questions, it just punishes everybody. It never looks at what we call the root causes of harmful drug use.”

Money would be better spent preventing the “small percentage” of people who are harmed by these drugs through education and understanding root causes, Oscapella said.


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: addiction; bongbrigade; himrleroy; knowmrleroysrights; likewowman; mrleroy; mrleroygotbanned; onenotesamba; onetrickpony; potheads; thatsmrleroytoyou; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-382 next last
To: PaxMacian

When the bible mentions "herb", I seriously doubt that it specifically means marijuana. But otherwise, I'm in favor of taking power away from politicians.


81 posted on 09/22/2005 8:13:06 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Does the consumption of alcohol not harm society? Homosexuality can be shown to harm society, should it be outlawed also?

Do you not believe there comes a point where the government's duty to protect society as a whole becomes oppressive and the harm it does outweighs the good?

In a effort to stop people from enjoying a bit of a naturally occuring weed, the government has created a HUGE black market which in turn causes criminal activity and causes thousands of deaths from violence every year.

Please point to the exact article and section in the Constitution that empowers the federal government to outlaw ANY drug.


82 posted on 09/22/2005 8:20:38 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: route695
Really, how is it (smoking pot) any different than beer?

In my experience, pot destroys motivation.

It turns most users, especially teens, into naval gazers and gigglers as they morph into a cerebral state of intoxication.

Looking back, I wish I had not smoked so much pot as a teen, not because I think it is permanently harmful, but because it ruined my motivation and seemingly turned me against the so-called establishment.

The other thing pot does is ruin short term memory.

I feel like I missed out on numerous years of my life, mostly because I can't remember details of things I did even though people tell me ....

Most people I know end up hating pot as they get older because smoking it makes them extremely anxious and nervous, like everyone in the world can see that they are high.

It also makes people feel like they are being irresponsible and unable to do anything intricate or demanding.

83 posted on 09/22/2005 8:31:18 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Herb: a plant or plant part valued for its medicinal, savory, or aromatic qualities.

It certainly qualifies as an herb. The particular herb in question contains the most complete and absorbable combination of amino acids required by the human body for sustenance of any plant or meat on the face of the Earth. I point this out becuase usually people find fault in the use clause of the quotation and 'food' or 'meat' makes more sense relative to this efficient protein source. In addition Strong's Concordance has the word translated as 'food" to be:

'oklah (ok-law');  Noun Feminine, Strong #: 402

  1. food
    1. food, eating
    2. object of devouring, consuming
      1. by wild beasts (figurative)
      2. in fire
      3. of judgment (figurative)
KJV Word Usage and Count
meat 8
devour 3
fuel 3
eat 2
consume 1
food 1

84 posted on 09/22/2005 8:31:19 AM PDT by PaxMacian (Gen 1:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

"Whoever thinks he understands divine scripture or any part of it, but whose interpretation does not build up the twofold love of God and neighbor, has not really understood it." St. Augustine


85 posted on 09/22/2005 8:38:39 AM PDT by PaxMacian (Gen 1:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MojoWire

"In my experience, pot destroys motivation."

The condition which you speak of is called "Amotivational syndrome," by the satanic psyche communities and is newspeak for "the sloth." It is in no way justification for imprisoning an individual for possession of a flower from the garden of God solely on the basis that it may alter the thoughts in that individual in a manner deemed inappropriate by corporate pawns seeking to maintain the efficiency of their chattel.


86 posted on 09/22/2005 8:43:45 AM PDT by PaxMacian (Gen 1:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
Furthermore, marijuana is a gateway drug

Bovine feces. Quit copying and pasting from the DEA website.

87 posted on 09/22/2005 8:44:26 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

"hey quickly got around to opressing everyone."

Unfortunately, statistics show the inequity of prosecution
contrasted with actual use to be still significantly racially
motivated.


88 posted on 09/22/2005 8:49:46 AM PDT by PaxMacian (Gen 1:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Nice to see I am not alone in my views on this.


89 posted on 09/22/2005 9:41:11 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
is not the same"

It is the same in that it is illegal, first of all, and it is harmful to society. Lawful behavior versus unlawful behavior is also a personal choice.

Laws are established to protect the freedom and rights of law abiding citizens. Illegal drug use harms the individual as well as the fabric which binds our society.

You and I obviously differ in our views on the harmful effects of marijuana. In this matter, we must agree to disagree.

Good night.


You can't generalize all illegal acts into a single group.

You equated smoking pot to child molesting and murder because they are all illegal.

Well so is jaywalking, so is putting your trash out a day early in some places, but I would be stupid enough to put them in the same group as child molesters because they both broke the law.

At one time it was illegal for a black man to be free.
It was illegal for women to vote at one time too. And of course alcohol was illegal as well. But over time we realize the mistake and corrected it accordingly.

The same can be true with marijuana.

By your argument then if it were voted to become legal you would change you stance on it.
90 posted on 09/22/2005 10:28:36 AM PDT by commonerX (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MojoWire
I don't think young teens should ever be allowed to smoke marijuana. I think you are right about it having an effect on memory, and I think that smoking it all the time stunts mental and emotional growth. None of this justifies keeping it illegal for adults though, and it certainly doesn't justify putting people in jail and leaving them criminal records for possession small amounts of the stuff. I smoked pot when I was younger and like you don't look at that as good thing, but I still think it's crazy that marijuana is still illegal. I personally think that alcohol in many ways is worse, and I know that there are so many out there who smoke pot who do not allow it to interfere with their lives or cause them or anyone else any harm. People who smoke it morning noon and night and because of that never get much done and have little memory of there lives don't tend to do very well in lives pay for their "gluttony" and hedonism. They don't tend to be very successful at life and they miss out on fond memories that others will share. That serves them right. They should have used marijuana in moderation if they were going to use it all. But personally, I look at that as being their choice. It is not my place to make the choice whether some other guy is going to waste his life smoking pot morning noon and night. It is not your place to make that decision and I don't think it is the government's place to make that decision.
91 posted on 09/22/2005 10:30:08 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

"People who smoke it morning noon and night and because of that never get much done and have little memory of there lives don't tend to do very well in lives pay for their "gluttony" and hedonism."

Should have said:

"People who smoke it morning noon and night and because of that never get much done and have little memory of their lives pay for their "gluttony" and hedonism."


92 posted on 09/22/2005 10:32:07 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

"I have a friend who is actually addicted to marijuana. You can tell when he is in desperate need of a hit. "

I used to work with a guy who was impossible to be around unless he had gotten lucky at the bar the night before. Then he was a great guy.


93 posted on 09/22/2005 11:09:39 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands
Legalize pot? "FAR OUT, MAN!"

No more "far out" than legalizing alcohol as we did by ending Prohibition.

94 posted on 09/22/2005 3:24:38 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mannie
You know I was a drug user and a alcoholic for almost twenty five years and all that i can say that drugs abuse in general including smoking weed is not good for anybody's mental or physical well being.

Since alcohol proved bad for you (and others), should it be banned for everyone?

95 posted on 09/22/2005 3:26:15 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red6
Police are still fighting against child porn and they don't seem to be winning. I guess using this guys logic we should legalize child porn? While at it, why not pedophilia; lets legalize that too? We don’t seem to be winning that battle either.

Child porn and pedophilia violate rights; drug use does not.

96 posted on 09/22/2005 3:27:41 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
makes it sound like some informed Professor has reached some conlcusion based on evidence. NO.

Sounds to me like he's marshalled his facts:


97 posted on 09/22/2005 3:33:06 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
An individual can consume alcohol and never get drunk or even a buzz.

If one consumes a sufficiently small quantity, sure ... but exactly the same is true of any other drug (yes, alcohol is a drug), including marijuana.

98 posted on 09/22/2005 3:37:43 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"including marijuana"

That is incorrect. I was an avid user in years past and can assure you that your statement is untrue.
99 posted on 09/22/2005 4:23:33 PM PDT by This Just In ("Those are my principles, if you don't like them, I've got others" - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: commonerX

"You equated smoking pot to child molesting....."

Please refrain from free association and taking liberty in mispresenting my words. Be thorough in reading all of the discussions between myself and fellow FR's. This should answer your question.



100 posted on 09/22/2005 4:32:56 PM PDT by This Just In ("Those are my principles, if you don't like them, I've got others" - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-382 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson