Skip to comments.
Stairway to heaven
London Telegraph ^
Posted on 09/25/2005 3:32:50 PM PDT by Grendel9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Blowtorch
"In one experiment, a sheet of nanotubes one-thousandth the thickness of a human hair could support 50,000 times its own mass." It's going to take more than the strength of 50,000 human hairs! Just kidding.... this idea is interesting, but I think others will overtake it before it is feasible.
To: SamAdams76
Hurricanes don't hit the equator. The weather is almost always calm there. Sea Launch has been using that to its advantage for a few years now.
22
posted on
09/25/2005 6:37:16 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Grendel9
I'm tellin' ya, nanotechnology is where EVERYTHING is going.
To: Charles Henrickson
How would people be able to not start up conversations for that long? Would they be allowed to make eye contact or would they have to look up at the ceiling?Maybe I could finally prove my theory that the more people on an elevator is directly proportional to the time it takes to get to the next floor.
To: operation clinton cleanup
Maybe I could finally prove my theory that the more people on an elevator is directly proportional to the time it takes to get to the next floor. Well of course, the more people on board, the more people hitting the Mars, Saturn, and Uranus buttons over and over even though they are clearly lit up, and the elevator waits until no more buttons are being pushed.
25
posted on
09/25/2005 6:45:50 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: manwiththehands
Does this mean when I tell my kids to "think big", I am giving them bad advice?
To: KevinDavis
27
posted on
09/25/2005 6:48:33 PM PDT
by
solitas
(So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
To: HiTech RedNeck
and then all the little brats that press all the buttons!
To: Tribune7
29
posted on
09/25/2005 6:53:16 PM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(Don't get Stuck on Stupid="DGSOS"= phrase that pays for the 21st Century)
To: manwiththehands
I'm tellin' ya, nanotechnology is where EVERYTHING is going.Yes, it may be the answer to everything, or the end of everything!
To: ExGeeEye
You know sometimes words have two meanings. :-)
31
posted on
09/25/2005 7:08:08 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: ExGeeEye
You know sometimes words have two meanings. :-)
32
posted on
09/25/2005 7:08:22 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Tribune7
33
posted on
09/25/2005 7:41:43 PM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(Don't get Stuck on Stupid="DGSOS"= phrase that pays for the 21st Century)
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; ...
34
posted on
09/25/2005 7:43:01 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
To: Palladin
Yes but we have had an increase in technology since then. Haven't gotten much smarter but still the increase in technology.
35
posted on
09/25/2005 7:48:47 PM PDT
by
U S Army EOD
(LET ME KNOW WHERE HANOI JANE FONDA IS WHEN SHE TOURS)
To: Grendel9
Space debris is the Achilles heal of this thing. Since the thing will have to extend beyond geosync in order to counterbalance it, every satellite lower than perhaps 30k miles WILL hit it some day. Every one of them. I'd bet it would have a strike a day.
Between the work to remove every significant chunk of space debris, and the launches to put the first elevator in operation, a space elevator is a non-starter.
The way to go to space is a turbine/ram/scram/rocket aircraft that can fly literally every day with only fuel required. Such an aircraft CAN be built with existing technology if we get at it instead of fooling around doing Apollo 2.0. Granted, it will not have heavy lift capability, but large structures can be launched with throw away boosters until we get space manufacturing in place.
Apollo 2.0 and space elevator talk only distract us from what is doable.
36
posted on
09/25/2005 7:56:24 PM PDT
by
narby
To: Grendel9
I've done "Stairway to Heaven" on Christmas Eve in Cambodia!
37
posted on
09/25/2005 8:37:05 PM PDT
by
MarineBrat
(When it rains, New Orleans makes its own gravy.)
To: MarineBrat
"Yes there are two paths I can go by, but in the long run, you know I always change the road I'm on..."
38
posted on
09/25/2005 8:48:11 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: tet68
The unit only weighs 7 tons but can carry several people and 13 tons of cargo for a trip of several days duration? I see another problem as well..
See post #4.. Lower right corner..
The orbital anchor is 600 tons..
The Nano-tube ribbon weighs 800 tons..
I don't think the laws of gravity will allow for this..
39
posted on
09/26/2005 2:20:23 AM PDT
by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: Drammach
What happens if you're stuck between floors?
If the unit weighs 7 tons, how much is taken up by
the climbing/braking equipment, how much by crew habitat,
how much by cargo storage. Say you divide it up equally
that only leaves slightly over two tons for habitat.
40
posted on
09/26/2005 2:38:03 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson