Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Ready for a Fight
none | 09/27/05 | J. Dunn

Posted on 09/27/2005 6:48:25 PM PDT by future F22 pilot

Republicans Ready for a Fight It has no been almost one year since the Republican Party received a huge mandate in the 2004 elections. The results: NOTHING. Not entirely nothing as some issues have progressed, but in moral and social issues we have gotten nowhere. By now you are probably either asking your self why or answering that question in you head. For those of you that might be a little bit behind, or are just preoccupied, here is the answer: Republicans in Congress and the White House are playing political games. With the exception of nominating Judge Roberts, President Bush is not pushing the issues we want to fight for: social security, school vouchers, Medicare and Medicaid cuts, less business restriction and tax reform. And neither are the Republicans in Congress, they are carefully stepping through the mine field not wanting to start a war. Well it’s time for that to end. We have been sitting hear for almost a year waiting and waiting. Our guns poised to fire and ready to fire, but no command has come down. No leader has taken charge and President Bush seems to be overly busy with other work. The Republican Party has fight in it, it just needs to be put to use, someone needs to light the fuse, and we need to stop wasting the precious months and years. Let’s Roll.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: badlywrittentripe; crapola; elpimpo; fadlywrittentripe; forumpimp; gwb2004; ihavesomethingtosay; lookatme; mandate; notnews; pimpinghiswebsite; sogotodu; stupidvanity; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 last
To: nicollo

People give FDR way too much credit for being consistent and for having deep-seated principles. They think because the OUTCOME of his terms was "big government" that must have been his plan going in. Well, he certainly didn't oppose it (obviously), but he was a POLITICIAN first and foremost, and would have done whatever the masses wanted. Plus his advisors knew how to "play" him.


141 posted on 09/29/2005 6:12:13 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
My position is that disagreement if conducted in a civil manner is not a problem. Angry name-calling and mockery is a BIG problem with me.

It's the Ann Coulterization of the conservative movement. Anyone you disagree with needs to be marginalized, made fun of and named called.

142 posted on 09/30/2005 4:15:25 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson