not a strong pro-lifer
Is anyone surprised that a "strong pro-lifer" is not being nominated? Probably the ones for Souter in 1990 will be most satisfied, but do we really know?
We don't need a "strong pro-lifer" on the bench. We need a strong Constitutionalist who will allow voters of states to decide for themselves. We don't know whether this this pick is a strong Constitutionalist. Maybe she is; however, if she isn't, then Bush has just shown himself to be a man who has buckled under the pressure of the mainstream media and the minority party. That would be so sad.