Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Grand Jury indicts Tom DeLay on Money Laundering Charges (new charges)

Posted on 10/03/2005 2:58:36 PM PDT by kcvl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last
To: moose2004

Looks like Earle is a tad bit pissed about Delay's comments about him after the first indictment. This is all so transparent IMO.


121 posted on 10/04/2005 4:48:34 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: fabriclady
MESSAGE TO THE GOP

It is budget time in the Congress. I really don't know how any money for Texas can survive the political process - particularly any funds for U Texas - when a leading political figures is otherwise occupied and unable to support his state through the very difficult and tortuous budget process. HINT HINT

122 posted on 10/04/2005 5:46:40 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

How does Earle get around the statute of limitations? My understanding is that it would be 3 years for money laundering.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/CR/content/htm/cr.001.00.000012.00.htm

Didn't this all supposedly happen in September of '02?


123 posted on 10/04/2005 6:12:31 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
The committee checks cut to candidates were dated Oct. 4, 2002. See this post.
124 posted on 10/04/2005 7:52:11 AM PDT by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

If Delay has any sense at all (and I believe that he does), he'll let this play out, have the charges thrown out in court for the withholding of exculpatory evidence, and break it off in Earle's A$$. I would own him (Earle) at the end of this process...


125 posted on 10/04/2005 7:55:52 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

It depends on who you listen to....cronyism!


126 posted on 10/04/2005 8:26:20 AM PDT by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bush gal in LA

It is a talking point the libs are using...listen to one and you have heard them all...cronyism and cprruption/crime and the GOP!!


127 posted on 10/04/2005 8:29:30 AM PDT by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Actually, it is one of my areas of practice as I have a similar case right now. You need to read the following case:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&court=US&case=/us/000/96%2D792.html

"Section 1983 may create a damages remedy against a prosecutor for making false statements of fact in an affidavit supporting an application for an arrest warrant, since such conduct is not protected by the doctrine of absolute prosecutorial immunity."

If I practiced litigation accepting as gospel without argument one case, especially one that isn't really on point, to determine how to proceed, I wouldn't be a very good lawyer. There are ALWAYS exceptions and ways around a holding.


128 posted on 10/04/2005 9:17:18 AM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Ronnie Earle ran back to get another grand jury to re-indict Delay, after he realized he had charged him with a crime that wasn't a crime, and got them to charge him with money laundering. Money laundering is taking money gained from illegal means and then filtering it to make it look like it was gained legally. So Earle is saying that Delay took money gained LEGALLY and then filtered it into a crime. But what crime???

Did Ronnie Earle ever go to law school?

I'm starting to think that when this is all said and done, that this is really going to make a great movie, I just don't think it is going to be the movie Ronnie was hoping it would be.

129 posted on 10/04/2005 2:36:12 PM PDT by txroadkill (It must really suck to be a democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txroadkill

Earle-The Squirrel shoots another air-ball...how about some ethics charges brought up on this vindictive abuse-of-power-POS?????


130 posted on 10/04/2005 9:14:26 PM PDT by FlashBack (When I grow up I wanna be a coWboy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: txroadkill

Ronnie Arse Earle tried to get new indictment, was no-billed. No new charge for money laundering. But since it was on all the newspaper headlines all over the globe all weekend, the damage has already been done to us.


131 posted on 10/05/2005 3:47:44 PM PDT by buffyt (America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people. Pres. George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

What a waste of taxpayer's money!

If they wanted a legitimate cause, they should go after Sen. Clinton...but they won't cause they're chicken!


132 posted on 10/05/2005 9:56:01 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson