Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)
Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^ | This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th | Report from Mike Rosen show

Posted on 10/04/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by ajolympian2004

Ann Coulter just took apart President Bush's SCOTUS nominee on the air during her appearance on the Mike Rosen show here in Denver on 850am KOA. She called for listeners to write their senators to oppose the nomination. Wish you could have heard it!

Ann said - "Totally unqualified", called Judge Roberts "a 'dream' candidate in light of this nomination", mentioned "cronyism" over and over. Much more that I'm trying to digest. I called the station to see if they saved the audio, but no luck on that. Mike Rosen was just about speechless as Ann went on and on about why this was a lousy choice.

I agree with Ann. Huge mistake and missed opportunity.

Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Can't wait for Ann's column on this nomination later this week.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 850am; anncoulter; busheeple; coulter; dubyacandonowrong; dubyahasbecomehisdad; gutlesspubs; harrietmiers; koa; miers; mikerosen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 881-888 next last
To: AppyPappy
I think this will come down as a battle between religious and libertarian conservatives.

Yes, Miers is a born-again conservative Christian. That's why Harry Reid is so enthusiastic about her.

121 posted on 10/04/2005 11:04:59 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

He really needs 60 votes to knock down a Dim filibuster, unless the Pubbies were to go "nucular". So, he was clearly trying to avoid that fight. His pick of Miers will be viewed as brilliant "strategery" if she is easily confirmed and subsequently lines up philosophically and by vote with Scalia and Thomas. Time will tell, as this is a matter of faith at this point.


122 posted on 10/04/2005 11:05:16 AM PDT by HoosierFather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Who wouldn't support her in the GOP? She'd be the first black woman on the Supreme Court. Do you recall the spike in the black vote in the 2004 election? More than enough incentive to build on that with a JRB appointment.

Off the top of my head, Santorum for starters (mea culpa for supporting Specter) is in a particularly bad place with conservatives and needs to regain some traction going into 2006.


123 posted on 10/04/2005 11:05:49 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Stuck on Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Thanks, I'm just so sick of people not recognizing that fact that we couldn't even get Bolton Confirmed, yet we here screams of betrayal aimed at President Bush for recognizing he can't get a Justice like Janice Rogers Brown confirmed.

Can you imagine the press if a Bush nominee is defeated?

124 posted on 10/04/2005 11:06:02 AM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pippin
You will support Bush no matter what. I supported him in the elections, I supported him on many things. But this pick is weak and a gamble. It might turn out okay...wow, that's reassuring.

I say we throw up a proven, conservative candidate, let them filibuster. Then throw up a different, proven, conservative candidate. Let the Dems filibuster again, and then use the bully pulpit to show the Dems as obstructionists. If that doesn't work, go nuclear. This is a first down punt, period.

But I am beginning to suspect that many on this site would applaud if Bush appointed Ted Kennedy.
125 posted on 10/04/2005 11:06:34 AM PDT by madconservative (Proud member of the Donner Party Republicans... hey, it's better than being a Kool-Aid Konservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Sorry, Ann, your word isn't gospel to me. I'm leaning toward Bush's choice. I think he knows what he's doing. Smart you may be, dear, but you're not always right. Now like another poster said - GO EAT SOMETHING and give that mouth a rest!


126 posted on 10/04/2005 11:07:10 AM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

"Yeah, she's praising Roberts now"

Uh... I don't think she's praising him. If your husband or wife said "So and so is so stupid they make YOU look smart" would you take that as praise?


127 posted on 10/04/2005 11:07:23 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
When a pitbull like Ann C. is questioned for being fair weathered I have to think that the world has turned upside down.

Coulter just wants a fight, as do many here. Bush doesn't do that.

Coulter gets paid to make TV appearances. A Rogers-Brown would have her on Hannity every night, shouting down Colmes or Bob Beckel.

With no fight, Coulter sits at home.

Which raises the question: I saw many here yesterday object to Meirs because she wasn't married. Some even hinted she might be a lez.

How come Ann Coulter's still single? She hasn't found the right Rottweiler yet?

128 posted on 10/04/2005 11:07:26 AM PDT by sinkspur (Breed every trace of the American Staffordshire Terrier out of existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

"A damn shame Annie has latched on to the Lefty talking point of the day."

The Free Republic is sounding a lot like the Democratic Underground. It's turning into a 24/7 Bush bash.

I trust my vote for Bush and I'm not going to back down because the fringe rightwing is mad. Annie and Billy kristol don't speak for me and never will. They're right wing lunatics and are no different then the fool... Mike Moore.


129 posted on 10/04/2005 11:07:31 AM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blowfish; All
Then thank the stars you aren't involved in the selection process. The supreme court is no place for toadies and benchwarmers.

Another point that Ann mentioned. There are only nine Supreme Court justice spots available and when a rare opportunity comes up to choose someone for that lifetime position you choose from the most qualified available nominees. That didn't happen in this case. Ann is exactly correct.

130 posted on 10/04/2005 11:08:00 AM PDT by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

"Ann is a liberal!!! She should go to DU!!! Mmmmmmm . . . . Kool-Aid."

Wow. What a thoughtful and profound comment.


131 posted on 10/04/2005 11:08:16 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

It's rather amazing how childish people can be. I don't agree with Ann on everything but she is a very strong conservative voice. I have heard plenty of others as well speak out or at least voice some concerns and the Bush loyalists are trying to shout them down by any means necessary. Maybe she will turn out to be a good nominee. Who knows? I thought that we supported free speech around here but I guess not.


132 posted on 10/04/2005 11:08:34 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"I imagine there will be a poem on the headstone. :-P"

I still remember my favorite poem from when Nipsy would close out the MatchGame gameshows...

To those who choose
A life of booze
I have no pity at all...
For my sorrow lies
with you sober guys
'Cause us drunks are having a ball!

133 posted on 10/04/2005 11:08:42 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Souled_Out
Doncha know that anyone that disagrees with the Republician line is suspect.

I've been called all kinds of nasty things lately. If these Bush-bots only knew how much grief I've suffered almost everyday for the past five years, at home and at work, for being a Bush supporter. Morons.

134 posted on 10/04/2005 11:08:43 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: kevao
"Yes, Miers is a born-again conservative Christian. That's why Harry Reid is so enthusiastic about her."

I assume that Reid did not know her conservative Christian background when he suggested her to President Bush. I then think a "light" went on in the President's head that said , WOW!, What an opportunity to nominate someone I know thinks as I do and also do what Reid suggested!
135 posted on 10/04/2005 11:08:53 AM PDT by jimbergin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: madconservative

I think it's funny that people are saying everyone here should support Bush no matter what, as if that's just the natural thing to do, but God forbid he put JRB in front of the Senate because, naturally, our Republican senators will not support Bush no matter what.


136 posted on 10/04/2005 11:09:01 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Stuck on Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
They would have been filibustered. Then there would have been a long, drawn-out fight over whether we could break or get around the filibuster. This would take about a year, with zero promise that we could win. I think Hagel, Chaffee, Snowe, Collins, and probably 1-2 others would have bolted, giving Bush a big loss.

Worse, it would drain a full year out of any other issues or agendas. Coulter is wrong. She needs to read about George Washington and his strategy for beating the British . . . and his own back-biting generals.

137 posted on 10/04/2005 11:09:07 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mhking
It's awful funny that folks fall prostrate on the ground before Coulter normally

I really don't think all that much of Coulter. Her primary goal is to generate controversy - a lot of heat but not much light. I get tired of folks bashing Miers because she doesn't have a wonderous academic pedigree. How many liberals have wonderous academic pedigrees, and how much grief has that caused conservatives?

138 posted on 10/04/2005 11:09:30 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kevao
That's why Harry Reid is so enthusiastic about her

Reid is just spinning to discourage conservatives. Privately, he's probably defecating in his pants.

139 posted on 10/04/2005 11:10:24 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

I'm sorry, did Roberts rule on something already and I missed it?

AMEN BROTHER. People here are confusing our concern about unknowns with conviction that they are lefties. The point is, no one here is sure, and there are candidates about whom we could have been MUUUUCH surer.


140 posted on 10/04/2005 11:10:36 AM PDT by madconservative (Proud member of the Donner Party Republicans... hey, it's better than being a Kool-Aid Konservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 881-888 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson