Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)
Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^ | This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th | Report from Mike Rosen show

Posted on 10/04/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by ajolympian2004

Ann Coulter just took apart President Bush's SCOTUS nominee on the air during her appearance on the Mike Rosen show here in Denver on 850am KOA. She called for listeners to write their senators to oppose the nomination. Wish you could have heard it!

Ann said - "Totally unqualified", called Judge Roberts "a 'dream' candidate in light of this nomination", mentioned "cronyism" over and over. Much more that I'm trying to digest. I called the station to see if they saved the audio, but no luck on that. Mike Rosen was just about speechless as Ann went on and on about why this was a lousy choice.

I agree with Ann. Huge mistake and missed opportunity.

Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Can't wait for Ann's column on this nomination later this week.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 850am; anncoulter; busheeple; coulter; dubyacandonowrong; dubyahasbecomehisdad; gutlesspubs; harrietmiers; koa; miers; mikerosen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 881-888 next last
To: frankjr
I truly believe Brown and Owens and Jones would have been filibustered. Does that mean don't try. I don't know. I also don't know what Bush heard back from the GOP Senators when these names were brought up. Bush can nominate, but he needs the Senators support (at least 50 of them).

Well I'll answer the question. He should have tried even if he had only 47 or 48 votes.

What better time than to truly "out" the RINOs in the Senate and force them to vote with Bush or give up any hopes they might have of being a Republican President. I think you know who I'm talking about.

The fact that Bush failed to do so and instead accepted the Harry Reid recommendation tells you all you will ever have to know about the decision making process in the White House. This was a gutless Can't-we-all-just-get-along Rodney King decision. Washington is a club and Bush is a member. The disease that has infected his Presidency with it's massive spending and do-good social programs is the same one that will infect Miers. You will see it over time when she starts making decisions based on what her five star social circle wants to see rather than what the law says in plain English.

301 posted on 10/04/2005 12:14:14 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

president sounded pretty confident this morning about his selection and usually he is right


302 posted on 10/04/2005 12:14:23 PM PDT by italianquaker (Bush Derangement syndome coming to a theatre near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

or even worse, a dame sham.

"It's all just a part of this rich tapestry that we call life." Cocky Locky


303 posted on 10/04/2005 12:14:39 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
I don't like the term "Bush-Bot" as it sounds too much like "Robot"

Sort of like being dehumanized

Then you and the others are saying that those who continue to support the President are blind robots and inhuman?

Oh, and then there's the feeling I get both from threads like this one and from my liberal co-workers that I should just shut up and take what they and you say as gosple.

And Heaven help anyone who ssays anything positive about President Bush or anyone who works for him or are related to him.

I'm trying not to be offensive or stubborn but I feel like my opinions are being stifled or ridiculed.

Sorry for the rant but I had a bad day and it's getting worse.

304 posted on 10/04/2005 12:14:50 PM PDT by Pippin (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: andyk

Miers' lack of an "ivy" law school degree is in her favor, IMHO. So, she missed out on a four-year brainwashing session followed by another three-year brainwashing session? That's a negative?


305 posted on 10/04/2005 12:15:29 PM PDT by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: zencat

Does Bay of Pigs come to mind??????


306 posted on 10/04/2005 12:16:07 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: JeffersonRepublic.com

"It's always the same thing with her - beating up Republicans"

Somebody has to do it!


307 posted on 10/04/2005 12:16:28 PM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel (Yeah, I've probably been posting here longer than you, and I'm NOT a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
The choice of Miers has a ring of Souter-2 in it.
308 posted on 10/04/2005 12:16:38 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

He is a Coward, not asking congress for a Declairation of War after the 911 attack killes more Americans that Pearl Harbor; trying to work the war on terror through the f**kin UN when it was we who were attacked; not standing up to the out of control spending in conress by vetoing the pork spending bills; and most pathetically, asking the minority demonrats in the senate who would be an acceptable list of canditates so they wont filibuster his nominee. This boy is not a fighter and certainly not a hard charger. His path in life should have been on the board of some numbnut country club in Arlen TX that Hank Hill is trying to get into... Not running the nation.


309 posted on 10/04/2005 12:16:44 PM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly (!...The Confederate States of America rises again...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texasbound
I feel like I have to verbally walk on eggshells because I don't have a long record. I appreciate your kindness.

Harriet is that you?

310 posted on 10/04/2005 12:16:53 PM PDT by johnb838 (Screwn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Where does Roberts stand on abortion?
Nobody knows.

Ah, substance.

Does he believe the right to privacy exists in the constitution?

I believe he does, in the 4th amendment.

So what?

Er - the right to privacy is what made Roe law. Are you saying you believe he's going to uphold Roe?

311 posted on 10/04/2005 12:17:12 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Stuck on Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
How do you explain Ann's bashing of Roberts just a few weeks ago.

Notoriety, book sales, speaking engagements. She's the bad girl of the right.

312 posted on 10/04/2005 12:17:31 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Don't forget dresses like trash.


313 posted on 10/04/2005 12:17:55 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
That's the vibe I'm getting and I sure don't want a theocracy.

I second your opinion.

314 posted on 10/04/2005 12:18:01 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: steveegg

I don't think Bush is fooled and as far as Bush being fooled with Putin, Putin was never solid. Putin has the Russian mafia and old KGB threatening to kill him all the time. If they get to him, a former cooperative person would be rendered uncooperative.

I think Russia is a hell hole and there is no way to predict from one day to the next what politicians there will have the power to do. They can be threatened, blackmailed and hurt in many ways and that has NOTHING to do with Bush misjudging them, it has to do with the way Russia is and the effect that would have on a leader from there.


315 posted on 10/04/2005 12:18:03 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: pointsal
The choice of Miers has a ring of Souter-2 in it.

Hopefully not, but we are counting on the 'benefit of the doubt' for President Bush. Who knows... will it be like father like son.

316 posted on 10/04/2005 12:18:56 PM PDT by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
The disease that has infected his Presidency with it's massive spending and do-good social programs is the same one that will infect Miers. You will see it over time when she starts making decisions based on what her five star social circle wants to see rather than what the law says in plain English.

I've had the same thoughts as you. On the other hand, I've often said the average man off the street should be on the Supreme Court because they have more common sense than the justices.

317 posted on 10/04/2005 12:20:13 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Texasbound

Don't let the old times intimidate you.


318 posted on 10/04/2005 12:21:05 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Absolutely right.

Miers will prove to be a *judge* who prefers to just get along with her colleagues over faithfully defending the law as written by Congress and the Founding Fathers.

The whole Souter comparison is a red herring. Nobody will ever turn out like Souter, who was a turncoat from the minute he was confirmed.

But Miers can do as much damage to the promise of effecting real change in the direction of the court, Bush's stated goal, just by compromising on sound conservative principles like those eloquently put forth by Roberts in his hearings, and the conservative wing (Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas) of the court.


319 posted on 10/04/2005 12:21:15 PM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Toots
When Ann is the president then she can pick any candidate she wants.

What do you mean? I'm sure she's well aware of that.

And until then, do you have a problem with her voicing her opinion? Or is it just that her opinion differs from yours? I certainly hope this Miers lady is more tolerant of dissent than some FReepers I've encountered lately.

320 posted on 10/04/2005 12:21:44 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 881-888 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson