Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)
Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^ | This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th | Report from Mike Rosen show

Posted on 10/04/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by ajolympian2004

Ann Coulter just took apart President Bush's SCOTUS nominee on the air during her appearance on the Mike Rosen show here in Denver on 850am KOA. She called for listeners to write their senators to oppose the nomination. Wish you could have heard it!

Ann said - "Totally unqualified", called Judge Roberts "a 'dream' candidate in light of this nomination", mentioned "cronyism" over and over. Much more that I'm trying to digest. I called the station to see if they saved the audio, but no luck on that. Mike Rosen was just about speechless as Ann went on and on about why this was a lousy choice.

I agree with Ann. Huge mistake and missed opportunity.

Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Can't wait for Ann's column on this nomination later this week.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 850am; anncoulter; busheeple; coulter; dubyacandonowrong; dubyahasbecomehisdad; gutlesspubs; harrietmiers; koa; miers; mikerosen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 881-888 next last
To: mariabush

Well, my comments were made in sarcasm, yours was caddy.


321 posted on 10/04/2005 12:21:48 PM PDT by Rebelbase (New Orleans rebuild by Mexican Labor will produce crawfish tacos and menuedo-gumbo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Then why are Luttig, Owen and Rogers Brown still cooling their heels on the sidelines?

Bush is a poker player and he's playing his cards to maximum effect. He knows that he will likely get to replace Stevens, who's 85 years old, and has a better than even chance of replacing Ginsburg, who is still in ill health after being diagnosed with colon cancer in 1999. It's possible that he'll have to replace someone else as well.

Be of good cheer and think for the long term. I see Luttig and Brown being on the SCOTUS before the next presidential election.

 

Stingray: Conservative blog       

        <-------- Visit Stingray blogsite for conservative Christian commentary

 

322 posted on 10/04/2005 12:22:45 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed
Unless you wait until the hearing to start bashing this woman, you are nothing more that a rumor monger. You might want to add that caveats when you are talking to your Christian friends.
323 posted on 10/04/2005 12:23:53 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly


Coward is a word I'd assign to you there anonymous, tough talking, keyboard jock.

I've never seen you contribute one positive thought to this forum.


324 posted on 10/04/2005 12:24:00 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Bush's public pronouncements regarding Putin are nothing compared to Yeltsin and slick willie stealing hundreds of millions of US dollars for their private use.


325 posted on 10/04/2005 12:25:19 PM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Pippin
"I don't like the term "Bush-Bot" as it sounds too much like "Robot"

Sort of like being dehumanized"


You know, I have to agree with you on this one.

I am one of those others that you describe that has used that term today and I apologize for being such an ass.

I have posted more in the last few days than I have in years and I was getting a little frustrated at being called names and being attacked for what I believe are legitimate concerns.

Please except my heartfelt apologies.

No matter what we think about this choice we will not know anything for sure for a few years and after we see some decisions come down.

My watermark is the 08 elections to decide where my support will go.

326 posted on 10/04/2005 12:25:50 PM PDT by Souled_Out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
She doesn't have a clue what kind of a Supreme Court justice Miers will make.

Neither do we, unfortunately. But we should, and could have.

327 posted on 10/04/2005 12:25:54 PM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

GOP base needs to tell their Senators its time to choose: It's Miers' job or their. Full revolt if Miers is confirmed.

It would be funny to see Miers confirmed by a lopsided Democrat-heavy vote, then go on to vote in lockstep with Thomas and Scalia, eventually overturning Roe.


328 posted on 10/04/2005 12:27:21 PM PDT by counterpunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank; holdonnow
As Mark Levin said on his show last night....he was involved in the vetting of Anthony Kennedy and Kennedy lied through his teeth about his judicial philosophy. Anyone can say anything. Why leave anything to chance? Why, when there were potential nominees with a strong record...should we now just hope and trust...why didn't he pick someone who had a record of originalism? Why? I just don't get it

All your Levin anecdote illustrates is no vetting is perfect. President Bush has worked with Miers for years and she has spearheaded that very process for his other nominees. This reminds me of the Cheney pick. The odds are much more in Bush's favor that Miers is as he represents.

BTW, I didn't realize Levin is living with the shame of not vetting Kennedy properly and blaming it on "lies". Not very impressive for Mark.

329 posted on 10/04/2005 12:27:28 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

He hasn't hidden at all. Right out there today in the Rose Garden making his case.

I have a good feeling about this woman, and just ask my children if I am hardly ever wrong.


330 posted on 10/04/2005 12:27:58 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed
The Conservatives have been stabbed in the back by this choice.

Funny, isn't it, that most of them don't feel that way?

Maybe you should tell them, huh?

331 posted on 10/04/2005 12:29:44 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
Does Bay of Pigs come to mind??????

Sure, but how does an attempt to overthrow a communist regime 90 miles from the United States amount to treason? While a complete failure, it would seem to be the opposite of treason against our country.

Kennedy was also awarded a Navy and Marine Corps Medal for his heroics in the rescue of the crew of PT 109, and a Purple Heart.

Not exactly the resume of a traitor, and why I no longer take Coulter seriously.
332 posted on 10/04/2005 12:30:08 PM PDT by zencat (The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: giotto
The cronyism charge is an interesting one.

It seems to me that Bush is picking candidates who were savvy enough to keep their noses clean over the years. We're not in the process, and for better or worse have to trust the leadership to a certain extent. Perhaps there's "dirt" (as in double standard dirt -- wouldn't tank a liberal, but would send a conservative into a tailspin) on some of the other candidates?

Everytime a minority the libs like makes a first, first governor, first sports hero position, whatever, there are calls for global celebration. Any lib female with Miers' accomplishments (in private practive, in Bar leadership) would be hailed as a Betty Friedan/Margaret Mead or pick your feminaziwacko, as a "groundbreaker" a courageous, blah blah, blah.

Look at Michael Steele, First Black Liutenant (sp?) Governor of Maryland? You'd think the spot were vacant, and they illegaly got a copy of his credit report.

Here's Miers, with THIRTY YEARS of REAL legal experience, and it's like she's a freshly-minted law student. She's, like, a real American person, versus a Ivy-poisoned type, of which there are many.

Do you know how many liberals with her exact qualifications would be totally seen as hugely qualified, no whisper of qualification issues?

I'm starting to like this candidate more and more.

333 posted on 10/04/2005 12:30:33 PM PDT by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

So that leaves "blind" trust in President Bush's judge of character and his pretty-good record of nominations in the lower courts versus the historic record of Pubbie SCOTUS nominations (going back through President Eisenhower) and the contradictory nature of the thin Miers public record. With Miers being Dingy Harry's "pick", I have to lean more toward the "like-for-like" label rather than the "more-conservative" one.


334 posted on 10/04/2005 12:30:52 PM PDT by steveegg (The quarterly FReepathon is the price you pay for FR...until enough people become monthlies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Bush is free to pick any man or woman off the street. One need not be a judge or lawyer to serve as a Justice.

Another issue that keeps coming up is the charge that Bush shouldn't engage in "cronyism", but owes this one or that one a "reward" for being a good judge, etc.

He OWES this position to a loyal judge who has shown integrity etc etc, but not to his loyal assistant-lawyer?

Some of the biggest proponents of this appear to be snobbish lawyers. I guess to their way of thinking, one hasn't achieved much until she reaches the rank of judge.


335 posted on 10/04/2005 12:31:09 PM PDT by LibWrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate
Ann is just concerned (as are many of us) with the constitution. She has not said anything untrue about Miers. In terms of Constitutional Law, Ann is an expert and this woman is a mediocrity. And, she was also temporarily insane when she was a major demonrat in the '80s.

Why take a chance with such an important pick? Why roll the dice? It seems when we pubbies do, the dice eventually come up "liberal judicial activist." The dems always get exactly what they want--why can't we?

336 posted on 10/04/2005 12:31:14 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

If his appointees mess up, the (R)'s will have to answer for it. We'll just have to wait and see. This woman is all but confirmed.


337 posted on 10/04/2005 12:31:19 PM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Let's give the President the benefit of the doubt.

After all, he's been rock solid conservative on Campaign Finance and Illegal Immigration.


338 posted on 10/04/2005 12:32:23 PM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly

Your name says it all!!!!!!!!


339 posted on 10/04/2005 12:33:15 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: kevao
"I don't think even Harry Reid is that stupid."

That's the beauty of this, kevao.

I almost am afraid to think that Bush is savvy enough to pull something this cool off. See, on paper, Miers is INVISIBLE! She's got ABA, Bar Association, etc., creds, and these people, believe me, work in code all the time. If Harry Reid just saw her resume, stereotyped her as a Reno/Gorelick/type, abortion-lover, TOO BAD. Gotcha.

I could be wrong. Just hoping and guessing.

340 posted on 10/04/2005 12:34:53 PM PDT by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 881-888 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson