Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)
Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^ | This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th | Report from Mike Rosen show

Posted on 10/04/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by ajolympian2004

Ann Coulter just took apart President Bush's SCOTUS nominee on the air during her appearance on the Mike Rosen show here in Denver on 850am KOA. She called for listeners to write their senators to oppose the nomination. Wish you could have heard it!

Ann said - "Totally unqualified", called Judge Roberts "a 'dream' candidate in light of this nomination", mentioned "cronyism" over and over. Much more that I'm trying to digest. I called the station to see if they saved the audio, but no luck on that. Mike Rosen was just about speechless as Ann went on and on about why this was a lousy choice.

I agree with Ann. Huge mistake and missed opportunity.

Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Can't wait for Ann's column on this nomination later this week.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 850am; anncoulter; busheeple; coulter; dubyacandonowrong; dubyahasbecomehisdad; gutlesspubs; harrietmiers; koa; miers; mikerosen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 881-888 next last
To: daviscupper
Dubya should not have nominated stealth candidate just to please Democrats and RINOS.

Your error is your premise. His nomination is due to having a principled stand he has not wavered from, not to please dems or "RINOS".

How do you know she's not in the Scalia or Thomas mold? President Bush seems to think she is.

681 posted on 10/04/2005 3:19:51 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I'm sorry, but did I miss the memo?

Are there people here who suggested that Ann Coulter should have appointed in lieu of Harriet Miers?


682 posted on 10/04/2005 3:21:09 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Ann who?


683 posted on 10/04/2005 3:21:19 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Anybody have Ann Coulter's email address? I need to have her look into Radiation Countermeasures and Dr. Anthony Fauci. Thanks in advance.


684 posted on 10/04/2005 3:22:10 PM PDT by cmiller623 (Mayor Antonio Villa....or never mind. Los Angeles is doomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
"So now FReepers are calling Ann Coulter an extremist. *LOL*"

LOLLOL!

I needed a day to consider this pick, my first instinct being one of disappointment. Upon waking this morning, after reading considerably last night, I came to the realization President Bush had made a big mistake with a LOUSY pick and missed a great moment of opportunity in history.

BTW, this time, unlike with Roberts, who looked better as each day passed, Miers looks worse the more and closer we examine her.

Ann's comments, though more negative and less measured than other pundits and talking heads, are much more in agreement with them this time, than when Roberts was announced. She is correct to mention, as she did on Hannity, there are many female candidates for the Supreme Court with far better qualifications and credentials than Harriet Miers.

685 posted on 10/04/2005 3:22:17 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (I am a Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham; holdonnow

Whatever, be as "cute" as you want, the fact still remains that krystol and levin were both on the same page yesterday(i.e "Bush flinched")


686 posted on 10/04/2005 3:22:31 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed
My guess is that you are a junior fan?????

Do you know this woman personally? Are you an attorney that has had dealing with her?

How did you become so knowledgeable about how she is going to react and answer the questions?

We will chat after the hearings.
687 posted on 10/04/2005 3:23:05 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Your exact statement is: "Harry Reid is causing FReepers to make the most astoundingly stupid conclusion that he must agree with Harriet Miers therefore she is bad."

'he' is singular. FReepers is plural. Reid is singular. Thus, the singular 'he' appears to reference the singular 'Reid.' Maybe a grammar refresher course would help you.
688 posted on 10/04/2005 3:23:32 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

http://www.slate.com/id/2127241/?nav=fo


689 posted on 10/04/2005 3:23:55 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

To: daviscupper
Dubya should not have nominated stealth candidate just to please Democrats and RINOS.

Who said he did??

Look .. I wish he picked Janice Rogers Brown

Am I disappointed???

Yes ... but that doesn't mean I am going to just throw his pick out the window because I don't know much about her

I would like to learn more about her and her thinking

Why is it so wrong to want to know more information about this nomination before making a judgment one way or another ???

I don't get that

690 posted on 10/04/2005 3:24:17 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Reid does not actually, truly agree with and believe in Harriet Miers.

I didn't realize you knew Harry that closely. Cousins? Or did you look deep into his soul and knew is heart?
691 posted on 10/04/2005 3:25:11 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Are there people here who suggested that Ann Coulter should have appointed in lieu of Harriet Miers?

Haven't seen that. I have seen someone touting her as an "expert" in Constitutional law, which is, frankly, a bad joke. Coulter is a polemicist, occasionally even a good one, but a legal expert or Constitutional law expert, she is not.

692 posted on 10/04/2005 3:26:19 PM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon
Is she more qualified than Estrada, Brown, Nuttig? WHY???

He may think so, but he ain't gonna tell you why because if he does he's either going to PO the conservatives or the liberals.

693 posted on 10/04/2005 3:26:59 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Do you KNOW that Janice Rogers Brown wanted the nomination? That she was willing to put herself thru the trashing by the democrats? NO, YOU DO NOT

Did you KNOW she didn't want it? Your guilty of making assumptions that she wasn't interested, yet I have a pretty damn good idea since she didn't withdraw her name from consideration like Pricilla Owens did! As far as democraps trashing her; it would be done at their own political as well as intellectual risk. Janice is one not to be trifled with!

694 posted on 10/04/2005 3:27:07 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
BTW, did you get your diploma in the mail from finishing the person below, correspondence course.

Hope you weren't gypped out of the diploma.


695 posted on 10/04/2005 3:27:38 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Dane

And they were both right. Besides, both men are independent thinkers capable of their own brilliance. They don't need to steal one another's thoughts.


696 posted on 10/04/2005 3:28:59 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (I am a Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
The nominee is not a Pentecostal. She is an Evangelical. World of difference.
697 posted on 10/04/2005 3:30:35 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
And they were both right. Besides, both men are independent thinkers capable of their own brilliance. They don't need to steal one another's thoughts

Okey doke, got you on record as saying mccain supporter bill krystol as "brilliant".

698 posted on 10/04/2005 3:30:50 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"I think much of the criticism of Ann comes from placing loyalty to the President..."

There is 300 million people in the United State. We all have different opinions and life lessons which shape us. I like the President. His ideology and his accomplishment fit me very well.

It's to bad we all can't have our own individual president who will always cater to our individual needs, but life isn't fair.

I will always put my loyalty to my President (voted for twice) before any political shrill.

Ann continues to blast against this nominee without any facts other then she doesn't know anything about the nominee. My advise to Ann and you is to learn something good or bad before giving a ignorant opinion.


699 posted on 10/04/2005 3:31:13 PM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

:) Ah but standards are different for conservatives. We have to be twice as smart to be considered half as dumb.


700 posted on 10/04/2005 3:31:32 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 881-888 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson